You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Land of the Free
Movie theaters must provide interpreters for deaf-blind customers, court rules
2017-10-10
[DALLASNEWS] Federal disability law requires Plano-based Cinemark and other movie theaters to provide specialized interpreters to patrons who are deaf and blind, an appeals court said Friday.
Beyond stoopid, well into ludicrous.
The Philadelphia-based 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against Cinemark, the nation's third-largest movie chain, in a case involving a Pennsylvania man who wanted to see the 2014 movie Gone Girl and asked a Cinemark theater in Pittsburgh to supply a "tactile interpreter." The theater denied his request.

The plaintiff, Paul McGann, is a movie enthusiast who reads American Sign Language through touch. He uses a method of tactile interpretation that involves placing his hands over the hands of an interpreter who uses sign language to describe the movie's action, dialogue and even the audience response.

The federal appeals court concluded Friday that tactile interpreters are covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act, which requires that public accommodations furnish "auxiliary aids and services" to patrons with vision, hearing and speech disabilities.

"It would be impossible for a deaf-blind person to experience the movie and understand the content without the provision of tactile interpretation," said Carol A. Horowitz, managing attorney of Disability Rights Pennsylvania, which filed suit on McGann's behalf.
Posted by:Fred

#8  "I self identify as blind and deaf, and I would like a ticket to a movie with a happy ending please."
Posted by: swksvolFF   2017-10-10 18:41  

#7  a method of tactile interpretation that involves placing his hands over the hands of an interpreter

So PeeWee Herman was practicing ASL?
Posted by: Skidmark   2017-10-10 10:22  

#6  The original law, before it was corrupted by the aristocracy, said 'reasonable accommodation'. The aristocracy long ago did away with that.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2017-10-10 06:52  

#5  Leftists seem to have zero new ideas.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rjm_zmBoxjw
Posted by: no mo uro   2017-10-10 05:00  

#4  It would be impossible for a deaf-blind person to experience the movie .......

hmmmm lets just cut it off there.
Posted by: Bov Flimbers   2017-10-10 02:47  

#3  And by extension, Best Buy must supply deaf/blind specialists for the households that buy their televisions.
Posted by: Fairbanks   2017-10-10 01:47  

#2  How does the man know that the "interpreter" is telling the truth and how does he know they are truly in a movie theater? Why doesn't he provide his own interpreter?
Posted by: AlmostAnonymous5839   2017-10-10 01:00  

#1  Deaf and blind? How would he know if they simply took him to a closet and "read" to him from a book? How is that any different?
Posted by: Injun Bucket8891   2017-10-10 00:26  

00:00