You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Africa Subsaharan
A timeline of the White House after the Niger raid (Video)
2017-10-20
[The odious and despicable CNN] Washington - How four US service members were killed in Niger -- and President Donald Trump's response to the attack -- has left the federal government searching for answers.

The Defense Department has opened an investigation to explain how about 50 ISIS-affiliated fighters were able to ambush a 12-man Green Beret-led team and why the team lacked sufficient support to ward off the attack.

The swirling story culminated in a remarkable moment for the Trump administration on Thursday: Chief of staff John Kelly, a retired four-star Marine general whose son was killed in Afghanistan in 2010, stepped into the White House press briefing room to defend his boss' handling of deaths in Niger.

Kelly described what happens to fallen soldiers and explained how the President came to tell a widow that her husband knew what he got into when he signed up to serve.

Kelly's remarks were the crescendo in an ongoing saga over the deaths in Niger. But it was the dozen days of silence from the President that has led to questions about the White House's attempts to handle the incident.

Trump first weighed in on the attack 12 days after the soldiers were ambushed, letting his spokespeople and the Defense Department take the lead.

The President, a very prolific Twitter user, never tweeted about the attack -- the deadliest US military exchange of his presidency. In the meantime, Trump used his preferred social media platform to lambast fellow Republicans, the NFL and the media.
Posted by:Besoeker

#4  Shooting didn't start until the team went to their vehicles to depart the meeting. Locals in one location, team in another. That should tell everyone something.
Posted by: Besoeker   2017-10-20 17:16  

#3  explain how about 50 ISIS-affiliated fighters were able to ambush a 12-man Green Beret-led team

Simple enough, embedded locals leak.
Posted by: Skidmark   2017-10-20 14:41  

#2  So CNN has already published more about this ambush than the Benghazi attack

Democrat Stenographers
Posted by: Frank G   2017-10-20 10:42  

#1  SOF (Special Opns Forces) fighting terrorism are stretched thin in that LOC (location) and elsewhere in Africa. Not enough drone/intelligence coverage, not enough dedicated CAS (Close Air Support, not enough QRF (Quick Reaction Force). SOF MTT's (Mobile Training Teams) have been deploying to that VIC (vicinity) for decades with numerically few incidents.

I had read that the Niger patrol was 'no different than the past 25-30 patrols in the same VIC.

No intent to 'arm chair QB' but it was likely an 'Extortion 17' type of ambush event. The old definition of insanity.... "do the same thing over and over again and expect different results" does not apply. You could very easily get more.... 'different results' than you can handle. Not to be overly simplistic or callous, but it's a very dangerous business in a very dangerous environment. Tribal meeting went on longer than anticipated? Bad juju.

Now 40 years ago (as of 4 May 2018), one of the most successful counter-terr, vertical insertion operations in history was launched. The Battle of Cassinga. Modeled after the Son Tay and Entebbe raids, this is how it is done correctly. But there will very likely be friendly casualties. Drone zapping "eaches" won't get it! You need forces on the ground to engage and kill the enemy in large numbers.

The leftest media hype is just more political rubbish and kak slinging. More Americans were killed on the south side of Chicago last month than in all of Africa this year. As with Cassinga, win or lose, the liberal, disgusting press (read that CNN) will still find fault. Just my penny farthings worth.
Posted by: Besoeker   2017-10-20 10:17  

00:00