You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Lurid Crime Tales-
New York Times Columnist Trashes Clinton Accuser Paula Jones
2017-11-17
[BREITBART] Because it will no longer produce any political downside for Democrats, on Monday, New York Times

...which still proudly displays Walter Duranty's Pulitzer prize...

columnist Michelle Goldberg penned a cynical, self-serving, 25 years-too-late column, saying that she now believes Juanita Broaddrick’s claim that former-President Bill Clinton
...former Democratic president of the U.S. Bill was the second U.S. president to be impeached, the first to deny that oral sex was sex, the first to have difficulty with the definition of is...
raped her. Using lies of omission, in that same column, Goldberg also trashed Clinton accuser Paula Jones.

’[T]here are reasons to be at least unsure about Paula Jones’s claim that Clinton exposed himself to her and demanded oral sex," Goldberg writes, adding that Jones was "championed by people engaged in what Ann Coulter once proudly called ’a small, intricately knit right-wing conspiracy’ to bring down the president. She described ’distinguishing characteristics’ of Clinton’s penis that turned out to be inaccurate. Her sister insisted to Sidney Blumenthal ... she was lying."

There is just one vitally important fact ‐ and I do mean FACT ‐ missing from Goldberg’s smear: the fact that Clinton settled the sexual harassment suit Jones brought against him for a whopping $850,000, and did so in 1998 while still a sitting president.

While Clinton refused to apologize or admit any wrongdoing, according to the Los Angeles Times, that $850,000 figure was more than the $700,000 Jones originally sought.

Why would Goldberg withhold that information from her readers, why such a glaring lie of omission?

The asking of the question answers the question.

Team Clinton and his shameless media minions claimed that the settlement was only about ridding the then-president of a nuisance. Others believe that if Clinton were truly innocent, he would have sought vindication through a jury verdict.

Mean Girl Goldberg can snip and snap away at Jones all she wants, but Paula Jones put herself out there, opened up her whole life to the legal discovery process, to public ridicule, and heroically did so in order to have her day in court, her justice ‐ and she not only got it, she got it from the most powerful man in the world.

Posted by:Fred

#5  I heard a discussion on the s3xual harassment stuff today on NPR, about Senator Franken and Roy Moore. Bill Clinton's relationship with Monica Lewinsky was described in passing as unacceptable.

I was shocked.
Posted by: trailing wife   2017-11-17 21:39  

#4  Yep the DNC party theatre will hang out a sign saying under new management yet the puppets will just get new clothes and string
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2017-11-17 11:10  

#3  @#2: I disagree. The floodgates will soon open on the Clintons. There is much to be swept away before 2020.

imo, had Hildabeast gone quietly into the night, things would be different. The powers that are will be taking the Clintons out of the power equation, and the once-docile press will go along with it. Again, imo.
Posted by: Vast Right Wing Conspiracy   2017-11-17 10:42  

#2  Funny, the WaPo and the NYT had the story on Paula Jones in July before the first Clinton election but sat on because they were afraid of how it would affect the election.

They're gonna run cover for the Clintons forever
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom   2017-11-17 10:30  

#1  Remember that photo of the "diversity meeting" at the HuffPost from the last year, where they're all white women in their early twenties, without a minority or a male in sight? My theory (which needs to be polished up a bit) is that when you hit say 25 or 26 you no longer fit in with the diversity girls, and your only hope for relevance is now Newsweek or the NYT, otherwise you perish.
Posted by: Fairbanks   2017-11-17 02:50  

00:00