You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Signs, Portents, and the Weather-
‘Sexbots are coming’: Scientists say ‘digisexuals’ inevitable as more people bond with robots
2017-11-27
[RT] Academics are arguing that many people will soon be identifying as "digisexuals" and taking their sexual identity from having sex with robots.
Women are too complicated. Your robot doesn't need bought dinner, doesn't have PMS, doesn't ask you to take out the garbage. She never complains about the way you smell, has massive bewbies and buttox, but she doesn't keep house.
While sex robots are currently quite primitive, a new report published in the Journal of Sexual and Relationship Therapy argues that before long they will be able to look, speak and act like real people - and will be specifically designed to fulfill a person’s desires.
Robots with a Jolly Green Giant Creamed Corn fetish?
The report’s authors, Neil McArthur and Markie L. C. Twist, from the University of Manitoba, Canada, argue that we need to be ready to deal with the phenomenon when it comes to fruition.
I can see this will contribute to morality, stability, and setting a good example for the children, if any.
"There is no question, then, that sexbots are coming," McArthur and Twist say. "Our view is that they will represent a different sort of sexual experience from what existing technologies offer. First of all, people will form an intense connection with their robot companions."
"X98276, I'm falling in love with you!"
[BZDEEP!]

"These robots will be tailor-made to meet people's desires, and will do things that human partners cannot or will not do. For this reason, significant numbers of people will likely come to use robots as their primary mode of sexual experience."
On the other hand: Saudi Arabian robot citizen wants a baby
The pair, who also co-authored the book "Robot Sex: A Book for the Enlightened Sapiosexual," argue that the rise of digisexuality will bring benefits, including potentially saving human relationships.
Not saving human population.
They also say that digisexuality will have a positive impact, particularly for people who experienced sexual trauma in the past or for those who have difficulty forming human relationships.
So now you can sit in your room alone. All your friends can be digital,
your shopping can be digital, and your love life can be digital. I recommend a healthy slug of digitalis.

However they warn that it will also bring a slew of difficulties and argue that doctors must be prepared to deal with digisexuality and have a framework for how to approach it.
No! Re-e-e-e-eally?
Noel Sharkey of the Foundation for Responsible Robotics (FRR) recently argued against sex robots being used by the elderly in care homes. "They are being proposed for the elderly in care homes, which I think is controversial.
Given the level of STDs already to be found in nursing homes...
If you have severe Alzheimer’s you can’t really tell the difference. We need to think about as a society what we want to do about it," the researcher said.
So no anatomically correct digital love for the geriatric set. I saw another article that people with rape fantasies shouldn't be allowed to rape their robots -- stick with real flesh and blood. There was another one that said pedos shouldn't be allowed to buy robot partners with the bodies of a nine-year-old. Seems to me those are the sort of people who should be encouraged to explore their digital sexuality, while the normal and the near normal should be encouraged to get together for some serious fleshly encounters.
"It’s very sad because it’s going to be a one-way relationship," he continued. "If people bond with robots it’s very worrying. You are loving an artifact that can’t love you back, and the best they can do is fake it."
Doh.
I suspect that once the novelty wears off, about the same people will turn to such devices as currently use vibrators and similar aids. The dolls, eventually no doubt available in male as well as female versions, will become the punchline of the same jokes.
... and cost about the same as a new car.
Posted by:Fred

#13  #11 robot sex goats could become all the rage from Morrocco to Pakistan
Posted by: 746


Like these robot goats?

Yea, I'll like to see them try!
Posted by: Seeking cure for ignorance   2017-11-27 19:18  

#12  Every story on sexbots seems to be an ad for those creepy Real Dolls. At least that's what the pictures all seem to be.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2017-11-27 17:38  

#11  robot sex goats could become all the rage from Morrocco to Pakistan
Posted by: 746   2017-11-27 14:42  

#10  Saudi Arabian robot citizen wants a baby? Guess the goat herd needs to be replenished somehow.
Posted by: Woodrow   2017-11-27 10:50  

#9  Anything I can do to help Conyers make good on his threat?
Posted by: badanov   2017-11-27 06:54  

#8  She never complains about the way you smell, has massive bewbies and buttox, but she doesn't keep house.

You need the dual attachment vacuum unit Fred.
Posted by: Skidmark   2017-11-27 02:18  

#7  Sounds like a relationship gone bad Grom. The theme of many country music songs.
Posted by: JohnQC   2017-11-27 01:45  

#6  You can't trust them - I've bonded with my computer and the bitch went and broke down on me.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2017-11-27 01:34  

#5  Have you ever watched the movie Cherry 2000 (1987)? Campy, but fun movie...
Posted by: magpie   2017-11-27 01:10  

#4  T.W., yuo have a bit of steel in your spine and a lot of love in your heart.
Posted by: JohnQC   2017-11-27 00:54  

#3  Short term, perhaps, Harcourt Angoluting9366. But some men go to prostitutes or have affairs while still marrying — it has always been so. How is a pretend woman different?

Some men achieve to impress women, yes. Some achieve to compete with other men, and some simply for their own satisfaction. Mr. Wife is in the third category — I would have been perfectly happy had he remained an engineer all his life, or gone on to something else that made him happier and earnt less, so long as he did it well. I didn’t marry him to live in a big house and have a lavish wardrobe*, and he has always known this. In fact, at one point in his career, when he was desperately unhappy with his management but perfectly willing to stay on to keep us in the lifestyle to which he desired us to continue to be accustomed, I gave him an ultimatum: he had six months to find a new job within or outside the company where he could be happy. I didn’t care which, and would willingly have again followed him far from Cincinnati if necessary, but he was not allowed to be a slave merely to maintain a certain income, even though he was willing. He beat my deadline.

*For the record, I do not have a lavish wardrobe. Mr. Wife has been known to complain about this.
Posted by: trailing wife   2017-11-27 00:42  

#2  Sexbots would not eliminate crimes of sexual abuse against others because these crimes involve elements other than mere gratification. Sex gratification is one thing; a loving relationship is something very special and different.
Posted by: JohnQC   2017-11-27 00:25  

#1  The real losers will be women. Big-time. They have a ton of power over men by withholding sex. If men can get sex without having to jump through women's hoops, the changes will be earth shaking. Men achieve great things purely to impress women. That's coming to a stop too.
Posted by: Harcourt Angoluting9366   2017-11-27 00:06  

00:00