You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
The Mueller Investigation - Another Hillary Mole
2017-12-04
[American Thinker] How objective can an investigation into Hillary Clinton’s email investigation be when the FBI agent who played a lead role was removed from it this summer for texting his pro-Hillary and anti-Trump sympathies? And why does House Intelligence committee Chairman Devin Nunes have to read about it in the New York Times and the Washington Post? As Byron York reports in the Washington Examiner:
House Intelligence Committee chairman Devin Nunes has issued an angry demand to the FBI and Department of Justice to explain why they kept the committee in the dark over the reason Special Counsel Robert Mueller kicked a key supervising FBI agent off the Trump-Russia investigation.

Stories in both the Washington Post and New York Times on Saturday reported that Peter Strzok, who played a key role in the original FBI investigation into the Trump-Russia matter, and then a key role in Mueller's investigation, and who earlier had played an equally critical role in the FBI's Hillary Clinton email investigation, was reassigned out of the Mueller office because of anti-Trump texts he exchanged with a top FBI lawyer, Lisa Page, with whom Strzok was having an extramarital affair. Strzok was transferred to the FBI's human resources office -- an obvious demotion -- in July.

Are we to believe that Strzok was diligently and impartially examining evidence related to Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump while being unable to contain his anti-Trump bias? Is he the only Hillary mole? Just look at Robert Mueller’s staff and James Comey’s exoneration of Hillary Clinton after the infamous tarmac meeting between AG Loretta Lynch and unindicted conspirator in Uranium One William Jefferson Clinton. Stop when you detect a pattern.

This news comes as House Republicans, tired of leaks and finding out about things in the legacy media, are moving to find both the FBI and the DOJ in contempt of Congress for failing to provide requested material:
U.S. House Republicans are moving to bring a Contempt of Congress resolution against Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and FBI Director Christopher Wray for stonewalling the production material related to the Russia-Trump probes and other matters.

According to Bloomberg, House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes and other Republicans decided to move against Rosenstein and Wray after the New York Times reported Saturday about the removal of a top FBI official assigned to Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s probe of the alleged Russia-Trump election collusion had been removed from the investigation.

If it's hurtful to Team Trump, it gets leaked. If it's damaging to Team Hillary, it's treated like the gold at Fort Knox. That’s not really surprising in a probe where Michael Flynn gets dinged for making false statements to the FBI, the same crime committed by famous Russian colluder Martha Stewart, but Hillary Clinton is not. But then, Hillary was never put another oath in an interview for which no notes were taken, unlike former FBI Director James Comey’s meeting with President Trump. Comey did not attend that meeting, nor was a grand jury convened. And where are the Podesta indictments, pray tell?
Posted by:Besoeker

#6  Unless the Democrats control the House

Don't forget the RINOs and Never-Trumpers. I can easily see Ryan putting pressure on Selected Republican congressmen to vote with the Democrats. To keep his own hands clean.

I wouldn't trust either party. A pox on both their houses.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2017-12-04 19:58  

#5  Unless the Democrats control the House, they cannot initiate impeachment, Vast Right Wing Conspiracy. The House prosecutes -- the Senate is merely the jury.
Posted by: trailing wife   2017-12-04 19:49  

#4  
Posted by: 3dc   2017-12-04 14:59  

#3  imo, this is all about keeping things at a slow boil until the Progs can take over the Senate (Thanks to Corker, it's closer than I would like.).



Then it's impeachment time...


Posted by: Vast Right Wing Conspiracy   2017-12-04 14:46  

#2  If Congress declares Wray and Rosenstein to be in contempt does that mean Trump can fire them?
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2017-12-04 12:53  

#1  How long is Mueller's boondoggle going to go on? It was flawed and stacked from the beginning. Its intent was malicious. It is a huge waste of time and taxpayer's money.
Posted by: JohnQC   2017-12-04 08:17  

00:00