You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Lurid Crime Tales-
U.S. spy chief orders changes in 'unmasking' policy
2017-12-08
[Reuters] The top U.S. intelligence official has ordered tighter restrictions on how the names of Americans kept secret in intelligence reports can be revealed during presidential transitions, according to documents seen by Reuters.

The move follows unsubstantiated charges by President Donald Trump and his allies that his predecessor’s administration spied on Trump and improperly "unmasked" the identities of his associates during the 2016 presidential campaign and transition.

Current and former senior U.S. intelligence officials who have reviewed the documentation dispute those claims by the president.

In September, the U.S. Justice Department said in a court filing that it had no evidence to support the president’s claim that President Barack Obama ordered surveillance of his Trump Tower campaign headquarters.

In a Nov. 30 letter sent to Representative Devin Nunes, Republican chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, and other top lawmakers, the Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats said the new unmasking policy is due by Jan. 15.

Nunes was among the first to charge that U.S. intelligence agencies collected information on Americans involved in Trump’s transition team. A Nunes spokesman declined comment.

Coats wrote that the new policy will reinforce existing procedures that "make clear that IC (intelligence community) elements may not engage in political activity, including dissemination of U.S. person identities to the White House, for the purpose of affecting the political process of the United States."
Posted by:Besoeker

#6  BTW, how many terrorists have been rounded up because of this snooping? Didn't do any good to prevent Las Vega, Boston bombing, San Bernadino, Orlando, or Ft. Hood ?

A question that should be asked at the highest levels of gov't, and often.
Posted by: Besoeker   2017-12-08 12:14  

#5  It was a targeted snooping, JohnQC, and terrorists were not the targets.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2017-12-08 12:11  

#4  BTW, how many terrorists have been rounded up because of this snooping? Didn't do any good to prevent Las Vega, Boston bombing, San Bernadino, Orlando, or Ft. Hood.
Posted by: JohnQC   2017-12-08 10:57  

#3  Just prior to leaving office the Obama administration allowed the NSA to share information from its vast international surveillance apparatus with the 16 other agencies that make up the U.S. intelligence community. Couple that with ginned up, bought fake dossiers to take to the FISA court to obtain warrants and "Unmasking" is blessed with the aura of legality and the info can be shared across all intelligence agencies. That seems to me to be a problem that skirts the 4th Amendment. Thank you Obama for your diabolical and scurrilous "fundamental transformation" (sarc on).
Posted by: JohnQC   2017-12-08 10:53  

#2  This needs Congress to pass a law. Short of that, anything one “top official” orders, his successor can order differently — as, indeed, happened in this case.
Posted by: trailing wife   2017-12-08 10:41  

#1  Someone thinks someone else may be around in 2020 and doesn't want that game played back at them.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2017-12-08 09:15  

00:00