You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
In any war with North Korea, the A-10 is a powerful weapon
2018-01-27
[ATimes] The argument the Air Force carefully avoids is that US aircraft don’t operate singularly. The F-22 is a strategic long-range pure stealth fighter bomber; the F-35 is a new tactical stealth plane that can play a role against North Korean missile sites. Much of North Korea’s largely obsolete Air Force is food for F-15s and F- 16s.

While nothing ever works exactly as advertised, combinations of coalition aircraft can keep the skies clear and go to work on the main strategic targets (long range missiles and nuclear facilities), leaving the A-10 with a prime role of blasting North Korea’s armored forces.

The A-10 is the perfect aircraft to blast any plans Kim Jong-un has to dominate the Korean peninsula. If his army is chopped up and decimated, he will only have himself to blame. And if he survives, he will remember the A-10.
Posted by:Anomalous Sources

#14  The U.S. Is Deploying A Huge Number Of MQ-9 Reaper Drones To Afghanistan
Posted by: newc   2018-01-27 23:07  

#13  "newc,according to my AF officer son, yes - drones are the future of CAS. Someday."

Well, there was a special kind of effectiveness with having an actual Human who could immediately correct action by call - a roving over-watch. I wonder what kind of delay the drone presents?
Posted by: newc   2018-01-27 19:16  

#12  At the US Open Tennis mens final one year, a group of A10s did the flyover, and of course I got all excited and gave the people around me a brief talk on it's capabilities- anyway I was left to enjoy the tennis in peace from then on.
Posted by: Grunter   2018-01-27 18:35  

#11  Living next to Davis-Mothan, it's always nice to hear the turbine whine of the A-10's in the air.
Posted by: bbrewer126   2018-01-27 18:16  

#10  Music to my ears. Coming home from work the other day I saw two A10s doing a simultaneous landing at Gowan field...loved it
Posted by: Warthog   2018-01-27 17:08  

#9  Like some of you, I have had the privilege of watching them dance together, A10's and drones. It is a thing of beauty.
Posted by: Besoeker   2018-01-27 14:00  

#8  newc,according to my AF officer son, yes - drones are the future of CAS. Someday.
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia   2018-01-27 13:53  

#7  "Remember the Macnamara's TFX Program that was supposed to give us a multi-service/multi-role/multi-everything fighter?? Same thought process and probably the same results: a low payload bomber."

But does it have port holes?

Seriously, what are we going to use for CAS?
Drones?
Posted by: newc   2018-01-27 12:10  

#6  Magpie,

What you say about ending up with a bomber is exactly the point - the Lightning is a first-day light bomber with a pretty good air-to-air capability. Politically and for treaty reasons, we can't call it a bomber (that's one big reason the F-117 had an 'F' number) and although you could make a VERY good case for it getting an A-series number (and the late, lamented Aardvark, for that matter) USAF internal politics would never allow it - the leadership will slash every tire and throw a thermite grenade in every cockpit before another official A-for-Attack bird sees USAF service again.

Now, all that of course does not mean the Lightning can ever replace the Hog at what the Hog does so very well - it can NOT. It is too fragile, has too short a loiter time, and cannot carry enough of the proper ammo. The difficulty here is that no other aircraft ever will either, and in a future Korean conflict the Hog may well be doomed before it starts. TFA states correctly that the DPRKAF will probably be swept from the skies right quickly...but the grim fact is that the Hog has never yet been in a fight where it was up against an enemy that can truly fight back. The Norks will have more than enough anti-air capability remaining on the ground to make using the Hogs a dicey proposition at best.

None of that is a reflection on the Hogs or their maintainers - heck, I used to be one (21TFS/55FS)back in the day, and I know the aircrews will push their attacks to the limit. But the truth is that their will probably be not enough Hogs against the potential threats to their mission.

Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2018-01-27 10:18  

#5  All cogent remarks.
Now, how to avoid a close encounter war?
Posted by: Skidmark   2018-01-27 07:53  

#4  There is no way in hell we have enough "operational" A-10s for the job.

But who knows, maybe the three working B-1s can make up the difference. It would take one or two years just to fill the backordered parts to make it a clean go.
Posted by: Woodrow   2018-01-27 03:12  

#3  Remember the Macnamara's TFX Program that was supposed to give us a multi-service/multi-role/multi-everything fighter?? Same thought process and probably the same results: a low payload bomber.
Posted by: magpie   2018-01-27 02:57  

#2  What I AM telling you is you have no better proven close air support on earth.

And until you do, take your un-shielded F-35's out of the CAS equation.

It is not, and never will be a replacement for the A-10. When you show me a viable replacement on the battleground, Then I will be sold.

I have seen the A-10 and the F-35 is not IT.
Not for the trench Warriors.
Posted by: newc   2018-01-27 01:57  

#1  The F-35 should be a fairly good wild weasel plane if it is fielded in enough numbers.

Although... my suspicion is, in any war with North Korea, we'd eventually wind up fighting China directly rather than indirectly. So we'd probably need more of F-22, F-35, _and_ A-10's.
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain   2018-01-27 01:44  

00:00