Submit your comments on this article |
Home Front: Politix |
Black Caucus Members Refuse To Denounce Hate Group Leader Louis Farrakhan |
2018-02-08 |
[Daily Caller] Twenty-one members of the Congressional Black Caucus facing questions about their ties to Nation of Islam chief Louis Farrakhan have all refused to condemn the hate group leader. The CBC, it was recently revealed, held a secret meeting with Farrakhan in 2005 but hid it from the public to avoid controversy. Twenty-one members of the caucus today were part of the caucus at the time of the secret Farrakhan meeting. All 21 declined to denounce Farrakhan when asked by The Daily Caller. The Nation of Islam is so extreme that even the left-wing Southern Poverty Law Center recognizes it as a hate group, citing the group’s "theology of innate black superiority over whites and the deeply racist, anti-Semitic and anti-gay rhetoric of its leaders." |
Posted by:Besoeker |
#17 Sultan Knish: The Congressional Racist Caucus |
Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2018-02-08 15:24 |
#16 A clarification: I was trying to describe the Western political mainstream's mindset as I see it, not to praise that mindset. I am well aware of the odious nature of political figures like Farrakhan, Sharpton et al. I thought Dershowitz treated Obama 'unfairly' insofar at least tacit implicit acceptance of non-white racism is a mainstream view. Not everyone agrees with this kind of racists but they're still members of the establishment tribe. If Dershowitz' outrage was sincere he would have to condemn this mainstream consensus, not single out Obama because of this one photograph. When he supported Obama he knew full well who Obama was and what he stood for. Obama's politics had never been a secret. |
Posted by: Elmerert Hupens2660 2018-02-08 12:14 |
#15 How bad could Farrakhan be compared to the Reverend Jeremiah Wright? |
Posted by: Abu Uluque 2018-02-08 11:52 |
#14 Elmerert Hupens2660, what happened to "no platform" for anti-Semites? he is 'one of our kind' Ah, I see. Tribal affiliation. This makes being a Jew-hater OK. They're ok if they're one of our kind. |
Posted by: Unomoling Borgia5457 2018-02-08 11:31 |
#13 Hat tip to Father Time. He has an earthly solution for men bound by the chains of stupid like our Louis. |
Posted by: Besoeker 2018-02-08 11:28 |
#12 Unfairly? Obama had Farrakhan to the White House a bazillion times, along with that other race pimp Al Sharpton. Al Sharpton was one of the perpetrators of the Tawana Brawley hoax. He accused innocent people of raping a girl. One of them was an assistant DA, Steven Pagones. For years, he pursued a defamation case against Sharpton and finally won. http://www.nationalreview.com/article/272473/al-sharpton-power-dem-jay-nordlinger In reality Farrakhan is a member of the Western mainstream political class |
Posted by: Herb McCoy7309 2018-02-08 11:24 |
#11 Why exactly was the young Obama-Farrakhan photo such a big deal? IMO Dershowitz is treating Obama unfairly. In 2012, 75 y/o Colin Powell was palling around with Farrakhan in full public view. Was there a sh*tstorm? Was there national or international outrage over a former Sec State's choice of friends? Did any Republican or Democrat or non-US politician criticize and condemn Powell as harshly as Trump is now being criticized? In reality Farrakhan is a member of the Western mainstream political class. Not everyone is in agreement with him on all issues, but he is 'one of our kind' in a way the deplorable Trump isn't. |
Posted by: Elmerert Hupens2660 2018-02-08 10:30 |
#10 ...probably no one. Was just sitting there on the curbside. |
Posted by: Procopius2k 2018-02-08 09:56 |
#9 Lemme get this straight. These are the guys who were wearing the funny ties during the SOTU, right? Yep. My question is - who shot the couch, guys? |
Posted by: Raj 2018-02-08 09:44 |
#8 Lemme get this straight. These are the guys who were wearing the funny ties during the SOTU, right? |
Posted by: Abu Uluque 2018-02-08 09:00 |
#7 BC members and Farrakhan are birds of the same feather--antisemites. |
Posted by: JohnQC 2018-02-08 07:53 |
#6 As Rex says at #3. It's tribal in origin, the root of communism by the way. While there are many others, the Blombos cave drawings are a record of their attempts at civilization. Some say the Blombos date 60,000 years before the modern era. These people are not to blame, tribal 'best practices' have skewed the DNA. While they possess remarkable regional survival skills, lads from the northern Athabasca cultures, the Yupic, Aleut, and Eyak make disappointing cricket players. The Hambletonian has yet to be won by a Shetland Pony, and so it goes. Each has it's homeland and calling. |
Posted by: Besoeker 2018-02-08 07:08 |
#5 Black Dhimmicrap Christaphobic racists. A mainstream media approved protected class of racism. |
Posted by: Woodrow 2018-02-08 03:52 |
#4 Surely conservative Republican Black Caucus members crossed over and denounced him ? |
Posted by: Besoeker 2018-02-08 02:19 |
#3 Tribe above country. Noted. |
Posted by: Rex Mundi 2018-02-08 01:48 |
#2 I like Dershowitz for the most part, but your description of his recent conversion is too convenient for me to put any stock in it. Too little, too late. |
Posted by: Raj 2018-02-08 01:22 |
#1 This is the occasion when a much younger Barack Obama was photographed smiling with Rev. Farrakhan, a photo suppressed until a few days ago lest it ruin his career prospects. Professor Dershowitz, upon being informed of the thing, announced he would not have campaigned for the gentleman in question had he known. Though to be fair, we all knew about the as yet unrevealed Khalidi video, and that did not seem to have triggered any professorial qualms. |
Posted by: trailing wife 2018-02-08 01:15 |