You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Government
CIA Argues The Public Can't See Classified Information It Has Already Given To Favored Reporters
2018-02-16
[Daily Caller] Intelligence officials can selectively release classified information to trusted journalists while withholding the same information from other citizens who request it through open records laws, CIA lawyers argued Wednesday.

In a motion filed in New York federal court, the CIA claimed that limited disclosures to reporters do not waive national security exemptions to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. Intelligence and law enforcement agencies frequently deny records requests on the basis of protecting sensitive national security information, one of nine exemptions written into the federal FOIA law.

The case stems from lawsuit against the CIA by New York-based independent journalist Adam Johnson, who had used FOIA to obtain emails between the agency’s public information office and selected reporters from the Wall Street Journal, the Washington Post and The New York Times. The emails the CIA provided to Johnson were redacted, leading him to question why he was not allowed to see the same information that had been given to uncleared reporters.

Johnson challenged the redaction in court, arguing that the CIA, once it has selectively disclosed information to uncleared reporters, cannot claim the same information is protected by a FOIA exemption.
Posted by:Besoeker

#3  Some cultures should be examined with regard to their ultimate benefit to society.
Posted by: Besoeker   2018-02-16 09:57  

#2  If it was a republican or a conservative journalist, it would be disclosure of classified information.

If it is a democrat or a leftard journalist, it's ONLY a leak.
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom   2018-02-16 09:52  

#1  The damage is already done. If a reporter has the data, so do our nation's enemies - sometimes they are one and the same. Disclose the information to the public so we can see what was leaked and to whom it was given.

What really gets me angry though is "Leaking" they call it? How about disclosure of classified information, including sources and methods, to uncleared persons who do not have a need to know? Isn't that a crime? Shouldn't someone in CIA be sent to jail for the original "leak"?

Posted by: Injun Bucket8891   2018-02-16 09:03  

00:00