You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Science
Deploy the Gerald R. Ford ASAP
2018-02-23
[Proceedings] The U.S. Navy’s newest aircraft carrier, the USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN-78) is in the fleet restoring the number of carriers to the mandated number of 11. The aircraft carrier force has been below the minimum of 11 required by law since December 2012 when the Enterprise (CVN-65) was decommissioned. But there is a long test program required by the Department of Defense that prevents the Gerald R. Ford from deploying until 2022.
Have they gotten the electromagnetic catapult to work reliably enough for operations tempo?
This year’s National Defense Authorization Act permits the Secretary of Defense to waive the requirement for shock testing the Gerald R. Ford . Eliminating the shock test can move its deployment up by a year or more. But leaders of the Senate Armed Services Committee urge the Secretary to shock test the new carrier.

A shock test is a series of underwater detonations of a specified charge that are put closer and closer to the ship.

In 1987, the Congress passed the Live Fire Test Law that requires all weapons systems to be subjected to a live-fire test. The Navy proposed to substitute shock tests for live-fire tests because people have to man a ship for proper operation while aircraft, tanks, trucks and armored personnel vehicles can be unmanned when live- fire tested. Further, to obtain realistic shock performance data, Navy developed the means to test critical ship components at "heavy shock levels" on unmanned barges that can damage the components without harming people. Congress accepted this logic and allowed shock tests to replace live-fire testing of ships.

For surface ships that operated since the Live Fire Act became law, the table below shows the classes built, what ship of the class was shocked, and when.
Posted by:Besoeker

#9  Test the catapult using Chevy Chase?
Posted by: Anomalous Sources   2018-02-23 22:24  

#8  "newc, a shitload rubber bands?"
Kind of. The steam catapult did not jerk the planes as hard to make stress fractures in them. The lifecycle has to be built around the EMALS launching system.
Posted by: newc   2018-02-23 18:52  

#7  ed in texas. Fire old Japanese Zero's to confuse the hell out of everyone. Put out garbled communications about time distortions at the same time.

Deny everything afterwards and/or blame Hollywood.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2018-02-23 14:20  

#6  Difficult to get more precise than that Deacon.
Posted by: Besoeker   2018-02-23 13:18  

#5  newc, a shitload rubber bands?
Posted by: Deacon Blues   2018-02-23 10:36  

#4  Yeah, they can deploy it to the Korean Peninsula, where they can us the catapult railgun to bombard the Norks with F-18's.
Load up all the old Navy planes from storage at Luke and squirt away.
Posted by: ed in texas   2018-02-23 08:47  

#3  EMALS is just not ready or correct. It needs elastic cabability
Posted by: newc   2018-02-23 01:25  

#2  Remember the Hubble Mirror problem? Recall the Liberty Weld Failures problem?
Theory does not guard against the Unknown-Unknown Problem.
Posted by: magpie   2018-02-23 00:42  

#1  Given the recent episodes I would recommend doubling the testing rather than attempting half.
Posted by: Skidmark   2018-02-23 00:26  

00:00