You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Submit your comments on this article
-Lurid Crime Tales-
Contradictions In Seth Rich Murder Continue To Challenge Hacking Narrative
2018-03-04
[Zero] As rumors swirl that Special Counsel Robert Mueller is preparing a case against Russians who are alleged to have hacked Democrats during the 2016 election - a conclusion based solely on the analysis of cybersecurity firm Crowdstrike, a Friday op-ed in the Washington Times by retired U.S. Navy admiral James A. Lyons, Jr. asks a simple, yet monumentally significant question: Why haven't Congressional Investigators or Special Counsel Robert Mueller addressed the murder of DNC staffer Seth Rich - who multiple people have claimed was Wikileaks' source of emails leaked during the 2016 U.S. presidential election?

Mueller has been incredibly thorough in his ongoing investigations - however he won't even respond to Kim Dotcom, the New Zealand entrepreneur who clearly knew about the hacked emails long before they were released, claims that Seth Rich obtained them with a memory stick, and has offered to provide proof to the Special Counsel investigation.
Posted by:Besoeker

#3  That's Whataboutism. Did Seth Rich send his leaks to Dropbox? Or was it Russians? Why did the FBI give immunity to so many of Hillary's proles without anything in return? Why is this fat guy even involved?

I don't know if Hillary Clinton had people killed. But I worry that she had people killed. That's a legitimate issue.
Posted by: Harcourt Angoluting9366   2018-03-04 11:39  

#2  The Justice Department already knows.

The "secure" Wikileaks dropbox used by Seith Rich to deposit the copied emails was under surveillance at the time.

AG Sessions must have a good reason for appearing weak. I can't wait to learn what that reason is.
Posted by: Blinky Unater1464   2018-03-04 09:41  

#1  kim dotcom was convicted of copyright infringement, money laundering and various other stuff and is subject to extradition. He has a long career of sketchy business practice, some of which is criminal.

That is why he wants immunity in exchange for 'information he has'.
Posted by: lord garth   2018-03-04 08:33  

00:00