You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Mueller's indictment of 12 Russian intel officers slams into the law of unintended consequences
2018-07-20
[American Thinker] Robert Mueller's indictment of 12 officers of the GRU, Russia's military intelligence agency, was purely for domestic propaganda purposes. The case was never intended to come to trial because it was presumed by Mueller that Russia would never extradite its own intelligence officers, and thus no holes would be poked in the purported evidence by defense counsel. Thus, the accusations in the indictment would be taken as dispositive by the mainstream media, and the theory that Russia was behind Donald Trump's victory would gain support with an official imprimatur.

Mueller tried this before, with his indictment of Russian entities that supposedly supplied Facebook advertising, only to unexpectedly face a defense team hired by one of the entities, Concord Management. His response has been to delay and obfuscate, quite shamefully (dumping four terabytes of untranslated Russian documents in response to discovery requirements), and then pass off the prosecution to "outside prosecutors" so his team can escape accountability for their phony indictment.

In his second round of indictments purely for show, Mueller tried to avoid the danger of a defense being mounted by making the indictments criminal and naming defendants who are real individuals who would face prison if convicted.

Of course, anybody with half a brain would see that once the United States legitimizes criminal indictments of foreign intelligence officers in this way, other nations will apply the same logic to our own intelligence operations. And the former U.S. Ambassador to Russia, Michael McFaul (an Obama appointee) tweeted:
Posted by:Besoeker

#3  Some statements are simply bizarre: Trump should *Force* the Russians to do 'things'. If the Russians want something it is 'Treason, TREASON I Say!' to agree to their demands.
Warmongering, much?
Posted by: magpie   2018-07-20 17:47  

#2  Maybe the Russians should charge Mueller with a crime and Trump agree to extradite him:p It's what Mueller wants right?
Posted by: Silentbrick   2018-07-20 16:57  

#1  Let me see if I understand part of this. With the first set of indictments against the Russian companies managed by Concord Management, Concord fought back in court and demanded discovery documents. In answer to the interrogatory, Mueller dumped 4 terabyes of untranslated Russian social media documents. This untranslatd Russian stuff was on Facebook and it was supposed to have influenced the U.S. political process?--Very doubtful unless you read and understand Russian. Give me a break! And were supposed to believe this is not a witch hunt?
Posted by: JohnQC   2018-07-20 11:16  

00:00