| Submit your comments on this article | |
| Home Front: Politix | |
| Writer of Confidential Kavanaugh Letter Speaks Out – She's a Far-Left Activist! | |
| 2018-09-17 | |
 BLUF:[GP] It turns out the woman who sent the letter to Democrat lawmakers is a far-left activist. Christine Blasey Ford, a California professor and far left activist, wrote a letter to a Democrat lawmaker earlier this summer claiming she was sexually assaulted by Brett Kavanaugh while they were in high school in Maryland over three decades ago.
| |
| Posted by:Besoeker |
| #29 And Trump just dropped his response: Declassifying Carter Page Fisa, Bruce Ohr work, and texts for Mueller, Lisa Page, Strozk, Comey, Ohr. |
| Posted by: Charles 2018-09-17 19:26 |
| #28 RALPH BLASEY III (CHRISTINE’S BROTHER) WORKED FOR BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP (FIRM MADE PAYMENTS TO FUSION GPS) |
| Posted by: Anomalous Sources 2018-09-17 18:44 |
| #27 Link on facebook to linkedin photo of brothers work |
| Posted by: 3dc 2018-09-17 17:48 |
| #26 Christine Blasey Ford’s brother worked for Baker Hostetler law firm who happens to have a client named GPS Fusion. |
| Posted by: 3dc 2018-09-17 17:45 |
| #25 It's her right to live a lie. It's nobody's right to make the rest of us live it with her. |
| Posted by: M. Murcek 2018-09-17 14:19 |
| #24 “I thought he might inadvertently kill me,” said Ford, now a 51-year-old research psychologist in northern California. I wonder if she is having false memories induced by virtual reality or other psy-op experiment funded by taxpayers. Groping charges after 35 years either shows desperation of the libs to stop Kavanaugh or it is a legitimate cover to look at new evidence. 8Chan, salt to taste, but new FBI docs obtained from Little Rock have new evidence on Vince Foster, a case that Kavanaugh handled. He knows if docs at CF have been changed. I hope Judge Kavanaugh has SS protection as the Clintonistas seem to stop at nothing. |
| Posted by: Eohippus Dribble5682 2018-09-17 12:54 |
| #23 And let's all remember. The "Senate Judiciary Committee" and the Senate at large does not have to abide by the rules of evidence or discovery. Just because... |
| Posted by: M. Murcek 2018-09-17 12:12 |
| #22 I'm a bit slow at times and might have missed something along the way but when did Dems become keepers of women's virtue? Don't confuse "MeToo" with virtue |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2018-09-17 12:11 |
| #21 You have to consider how politicians "do math." Failing to listen to this loon is the same as "ignoring half (the female half) of their voters." Never mind that on the GOP side, 2/3 to 3/4 of women are rolling their eyes, and not with sympathy for the loon. |
| Posted by: M. Murcek 2018-09-17 12:10 |
| #20 I'm a bit slow at times and might have missed something along the way but when did Dems become keepers of women's virtue? |
| Posted by: JohnQC 2018-09-17 12:07 |
| #19 Let's be honest, Senators. Whose side are you on? Do you really need to ask? |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2018-09-17 12:05 |
| #18 Democrats are reduced to this because they have nothing else they can do to stop Kavanaugh's confirmation. They did the same with Judge Roy Moore and Clarence Thomas. They offer no proof, only last minute allegations after 30 years of silence. This is a disgusting and desperate play that they are using all too often to be believable. If any Republican senators step out of line here they need to be kicked out of the Republican Party. Let's be honest, Senators. Whose side are you on? |
| Posted by: Abu Uluque 2018-09-17 12:03 |
| #17 By dumbocrap standards, the situation described in #14 means Blasey-Ford should "recuse herself..." |
| Posted by: M. Murcek 2018-09-17 11:48 |
| #16 She's also a Bernie Bro. |
| Posted by: Ebbavirt Clunk4147 2018-09-17 10:20 |
| #15 Mark Judge says it never happened. Mark Judge is one of those who was alleged to be there by Ford. Did it happen? |
| Posted by: JohnQC 2018-09-17 10:19 |
| #14 Martha G. Kavanaugh, the mother of Brett Kavanaugh was a Maryland district judge in 1996. In an amazing coincidence, Martha Kavanaugh was the judge in a foreclosure case in which Christine Blasey-Ford’s parents were the defendants. Now it all becomes clear. Blasey-Ford is going after Brett Kavanaugh, not because of what he did in high school. Instead, Christine Blasey-Ford is going after Brett Kavanaugh out of spite and revenge for a case rulled on by Brett Kavanaugh mother. Martha Kavanaugh, Brett’s mother was Montgomery County Circuit Court judge from 1993 until she retired in 2001. During a 1996 foreclosure case, Martha Kavanaugh ruled against the parents of Christine Blasey-Ford in a foreclosure case. The foreclosure case against Paula K. Blasey and Ralph G. Blasey was opened on August 8, 1996. The case number is 156006V. |
| Posted by: Deacon Blues 2018-09-17 10:17 |
| #13 I wonder if we can find some of her classmates willing to testify that she was charging ... never mind. |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2018-09-17 10:14 |
| #12 two? four? She can't remember when or where or what the circumstances were... It also appears Kavanaugh's Judge mother presided over Blasey's parent's foreclosure? |
| Posted by: Frank G 2018-09-17 09:19 |
| #11 I wonder what the four who Ford claims were with Kavanaugh might have to say about these accusations/allegations? Defamation lawsuits coming? |
| Posted by: JohnQC 2018-09-17 08:46 |
| #10 Appears someone is picking up the scent. |
| Posted by: Besoeker 2018-09-17 08:37 |
| #9 Debra Katz (Ford's attorney), Washington-based attorney. #MeTooMovement attorney? |
| Posted by: JohnQC 2018-09-17 08:33 |
| #8 Who is Christine Blasey Ford? |
| Posted by: JohnQC 2018-09-17 08:29 |
| #7 accuracy of polygraphs Problem is that only validates what people believe, not what may have actually happened. We know how earnest some people are but 'witnesses' don't always match other evidence. |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2018-09-17 08:23 |
| #6 @#3: Per Jonathan Turley ... Ford says that she was traumatized for years by the experience. However, there is no indication that she ever made a formal compliant to the police or previously raised the issue during Kavanaugh’s prior confirmation hearings. There remains the question of why Ford did not go public earlier when Kavanaugh was nominated for the D.C. Circuit or why she wanted Congress to know about the allegation but said that she did not want to go come forward herself. Ford is an established academic who would clearly be supported in coming forward to report an attempted rape. Now that the identity of the accuser is known, it will be possible to look at supporting or conflicting accounts. Did she share the allegation of an attempted rape with friends at the time? Is there any record of seeking medical assistance or injuries? She says that she called a government official about reporting the incident at the time but there does not appear to be a record. She also said that she received medical attention, but again produced no record. The polygraph is the most interesting dynamic element. While not admissible in court, the accuracy of polygraphs are often put between 70 and 90 percent when conducted properly. I have been counsel in polygraph cases and there can be serious problems raised in the performance of the tests. ... |
| Posted by: Vast Right Wing Conspiracy 2018-09-17 08:15 |
| #5 So who paid her to do this? It'll come out eventually. Posted by: Raj Hence the timing of the Christine Blasey Ford release. By the time her motives are discovered, the damage to the upcoming vote will have been done. |
| Posted by: Besoeker 2018-09-17 08:12 |
| #4 So who paid her to do this? It'll come out eventually. |
| Posted by: Raj 2018-09-17 08:06 |
| #3 Would you take a polygraph test Professor? |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2018-09-17 06:57 |
| #2 These are two different people, Besoeker. The one on the left has a a prominent chin, and the the one on the right has rather plain features - marry this one and social would soon dry up. |
| Posted by: Fairbanks 2018-09-17 04:24 |
| #1 Read the letter Christine Blasey Ford sent accusing Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct |
| Posted by: Skidmark 2018-09-17 01:12 |