You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Whatever Happens To Kavanaugh, Feinstein Got Exactly What She Wanted
2018-09-21
[The Federalist] The leading Democratic figures during Brett Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court confirmation hearings were presumed 2020 presidential hopefuls Kamala Harris and Cory Booker. Both grandstanded to great applause from Democratic partisans, but failed to nick the nomination. The two young guns made a lot of noise, but it was an older, wiser woman who with a single shot turned a hopeless situation for Democrats into a big potential political win.

Dianne Feinstein was elected to the U.S. Senate in 1992, the original "year of the woman." During the previous year, Clarence Thomas had been confirmed to the Supreme Court despite Anita Hill’s allegations that he had sexually harassed her. The Democrats used the anger many women felt at those proceedings to elect a record number of women to Congress. It’s a play that Feinstein knows well and helped invent. This week, she called that play again.

The timing of Feinstein’s release of information regarding the initially anonymous woman accusing Kavanaugh of sexual assault was simply impeccable. Democrats knew they had no reasonable chance of stopping his confirmation, but Feinstein, a savvy and old-school politician, found a way to turn lemons into lemonade. Feinstein may have wrought a political masterpiece.

It is very likely that Feinstein knew in July, when her constituent sent the allegation to her, that it was so lacking in any kind of detail and backup that it could not derail Kavanaugh. But that didn’t mean that the allegations from Christine Blasey Ford could not be politically useful.
Posted by:Besoeker

#4  and women are more emotional than men

Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2018-09-21 10:56  

#3  The very rare realistic woman is not a factor in electoral politics. All humans are emotional and women are more emotional than men. Expecting rationality among them is irrational.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2018-09-21 10:17  

#2  You're eating Dreamsicles, I'm afraid.

Didn't there used to be a Dreamsicle photo?

I do hope you're right. G(r)om.
Posted by: Bobby   2018-09-21 09:42  

#1  The Democrats used the anger many women felt at those proceedings to elect a record number of women to Congress. It’s a play that Feinstein knows well and helped invent. This week, she called that play again.

But maybe women wised up since then?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2018-09-21 02:02  

00:00