You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Iranians can hold US aircraft carrier hostage if they want to: Writer
2018-12-05
[PRESSTV] American writer and journalist E. Michael Jones says the aircraft carrier is the obsolete form of military technology and the "Iranians can hold the US carrier hostage if they want to."

On Monday America announced that the US Navy was sending one of its aircraft carriers into the Persian Gulf as a "show of force."

The USS John C. Stennis and its accompanying ships, which are currently moving through the Indian Ocean, will arrive in the Persian Gulf by the end of this week, The Wall Street Journal reported Monday, citing unnamed military officials.

If true, this will be the first time in eight months that the US steps up its military presence in the region to such levels, the officials said. That’s the longest period Washington has gone without an aircraft carrier in the Persian Gulf in the past two decades. The naval deployment is a direct response to Iran’s influence in the region, the officials noted.

"What we are really seeing here is a demonstration of the rule that generals always fight the last war. The last war in this regard was World War II, when the aircraft carrier replaced the battleship as the main way to project power on the seas," Jones said in an interview with Press TV on Tuesday.

He said that the "aircraft carriers are portable airports. You can take them anywhere around the world and you can spread your power, attack the people you otherwise couldn’t do."

He stated that "the aircraft carrier has become an obsolete form of military technology."

The aircraft carrier has been made obsolete in China by missiles which can strike a carrier 2,100 miles off the coast, well beyond the range of the F-18. And it has also been made obsolete by the situation in the Persian Gulf.

The analyst said that if an aircraft carrier sails into the Persian Gulf, "the Iranians can hold it hostage by sinking ships in the Strait of Hormuz," and the carrier will be stuck there with no way out.

"The other issue of course is whether the aircraft carrier can defend itself against missiles now. This is the open question. No one knows the answer. The first time the Russians fired missiles from their ship in the Caspian Sea into Syria, the United Sates pulled its aircraft carrier out of the Persian Gulf," he noted.

Beyond that, the big unanswered question is whether the aircraft carrier can defend itself against state of the art missile technology, he said. "No one knows the answer."

"The first time the Russians fired missiles from their ship in the Caspian Sea into Syria, the United Sates pulled its aircraft carrier out of the Persian Gulf," Jones observed.

"So what we are seeing here is a show of obsolete power" coupled with an arrogant foreign policy that has given up on both diplomacy and moral suasion in favor of might makes right, he concluded.

Posted by:Fred

#12  A couple of E. Michael Jones books. Had no idea who he is and now I'm sorry I do.

Barren Metal: A History of Capitalism as the Conflict between Labor and Usury 2014

The Jews and Moral Subversion Feb 5, 2016

The Slaughter of Cities: Urban Renewal as Ethnic Cleansing (Hardback) - Common 2003

Jewish Fables: Darwinism, Materialism, and other Jewish Fables Mar 30, 2018

Catholics and the Jew Taboo Jun 14, 2018
Posted by: Woodrow   2018-12-05 22:43  

#11  "The aircraft carrier has been made obsolete in China"

Do tell Admiral. However the Chinese don't seem to think so. They are in fact going to great expense to develop and build several carriers of very their own. They're working on #3 right now.
Posted by: The peanut gallery   2018-12-05 21:12  

#10  If someone could pass this link along to the targeting people, I'd be much obliged.
Posted by: Besoeker   2018-12-05 16:33  

#9  ... All of the above (and below, too).
Posted by: gorb   2018-12-05 16:01  

#8  Oh, a fill in the blank!

Iranians can hold the US carrier hostage if they want to _____

... die in large numbers.

... start a war they cannot win.

... see their navy and port facilities obliterated.


Anyone else have some?
Posted by: Glolush Whusotch4899   2018-12-05 13:06  

#7  When PRESSTV needs an anti-American quote they put on E. Michael Jones, like a used condom
Posted by: Frank G   2018-12-05 10:58  

#6  They can. But how effective it will be as a tactic depends on the attitude of the American president at the time. Do that with President Trump and it’s likely Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei‘s home will become rubble around him. Or that lovely port from which all Iran’s oil is shipped abroad. Or all of the nuclear bomb facilities whose locations Israel has so generously shared. Or... well, lots of possibilities, really.
Posted by: trailing wife   2018-12-05 10:27  

#5  They can do that exactly ONCE. For the same reason that any ship can serve as a minesweeper, once.
Posted by: Lone Ranger   2018-12-05 10:02  

#4  DVader, you are the MAN!
Posted by: AlmostAnonymous5839   2018-12-05 09:25  

#3  
Posted by: DarthVader   2018-12-05 08:52  

#2  While I think it's odd that you never see E Michael Jones and Baghdad Bob together, I have thought for a while that carriers today are in the same position that battleships were in at the beginning of WWII. Not obsolete, but needing new doctrine to defend against new threats and to avoid becoming the next "Prince of Wales".
Posted by: Mercutio   2018-12-05 08:24  

#1  The first time the Russians fired missiles from their ship in the Caspian Sea into Syria, the United Sates pulled its aircraft carrier out of the Persian Gulf," he noted.
Mars was also running retrograde to Jupiter in Ursa Major.... Just kidding, I have no idea if the astrological signs were like that -- still he just threw out a whopper of a non sequitur.
Posted by: magpie   2018-12-05 05:11  

00:00