You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Government
U.S. CBO Suggests $1 Trillion Carbon Tax As France Reels From Anti-Carbon Tax Riots
2018-12-16
[Daily Caller] It’s been just nine days since the French government abandoned plans to increase the carbon tax on fuel, and the congressional budgeting arm is suggesting a $1 trillion tax on carbon dioxide emissions to close the budget deficit.

"This option would impose a tax of $25 per metric ton on most emissions of greenhouse gases in the United States," reads a Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report released Thursday. "The tax would increase at an annual inflation-adjusted rate of 2 percent."

The CBO suggested a carbon tax as one of "121 options that would decrease federal spending or increase federal revenues over the next 10 years." The CBO published several reports looking at the budgetary impacts of a carbon tax.

However, the CBO’s carbon tax suggestion comes after French President Emmanuel Macron and lawmakers were forced to scrap plans to raise fuel taxes after weeks of violent protests. Those protests also spread to Brussels, where protesters clashed with police over fuel tax rises.

Tens of thousands of protesters, called "yellow vests," took to the streets in November, sparked by a planned rise in diesel and gasoline taxes. The tax increases were part of Macron’s plan to wean France off oil and fight global warming.
Posted by:Besoeker

#6  The extortion funded sector needs to shrink.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2018-12-16 16:37  

#5  Frank G asks, " Since when did they start doing proposals?"

Good question.

The CBO produces a lot of reports. Many are required by law. For several decades, more and more individuals in Congress have asked the CBO to do analysis for them. The CBO has, by policy, limited its work of this kind to analysis requested formally by the chair or ranking members of budget, finance and appropriations committees.

The number of analyses required are still a lot and the methodology has become standardized using a number of 'quick and dirty' methods which do not take into account secondary or tertiary financial effects very well (or not at all in many cases) and also don't produce quantitative estimates of impact on, say GDP or income distribution (sometimes the CBO will give a few words on this but without numbers).
Posted by: lord garth   2018-12-16 10:49  

#4  CBO evaluates budget implications of bills. Since when did they start doing proposals? Likely when politicians wanted to avoid sponsoring unpopular laws?
Posted by: Frank G   2018-12-16 07:00  

#3  Would that be the same CBO that presided over eight years of Obama spending ?

Posted by: Besoeker   2018-12-16 06:40  

#2  ...No fu@king way, especially as we're the only nation who's actually reducing emissions.

Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2018-12-16 06:00  

#1  Recycling a CBO Report from November 13, 2013? Remember all of the other promises that new tax revenues would go to paying off the deficit? Under Reagan -- they took the money and spent it. Under Bush, Sr. -- ditto. Why not try one more time? Things will be different this time, right, Right?
Posted by: magpie   2018-12-16 02:36  

00:00