| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Politix |
| Now That The Russian Collusion Narrative Is Deflating, The Left Is Shifting Goalposts |
| 2018-12-21 |
| [The Federalist] Nate Silver, of all people, recently tweeted that the scale of Russian involvement in the 2016 election was quite small, and its effect was not visible. Silver is of course not a Russian agent, nor should this sentiment be out of place. After all, it seems so obvious that it shouldn’t even need mentioning in analytical circles. But it’s not often that we see an otherwise shrill and religiously anti-Republican national publication write a normal analytical opinion. It’s a signal of the scaling down of the Russian influence narrative that has been pushed for the last two years. NPR’s essay on Russia collusion being unproven was a surprise: "Prosecutors say that [Paul] Manafort shouldn’t get any consideration for the information he has given the feds because he has been lying to them; Manafort’s lawyers say he gave the government valuable information. Nonetheless, the crimes for which the feds want Manafort to be locked up aren’t a Russian conspiracy to throw the election." It was followed by The Nation, no right-wing MAGA hatters, with a thorough essay discussing the differences of the ones charged, the charges, and the original narrative of the collusion story. In an absurd irony, the piece notes how Manafort might go to jail for a "crime" of ostensibly tilting the Ukrainian government towards the European Union ‐ weaning them away from Russia: |
| Posted by:Besoeker |
| #1 So the Russian involvement Was somewhere between $6k and a few hundred thousand... The dossier was paid for by Hillary, so it was cost free. I need to find out who in Russia worked the financials so I can invest in him. His return on investment was unmatched! I mean the USG has spent over $25 million investigating it, a hell of a return... |
| Posted by: 49 Pan 2018-12-21 09:18 |