You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Submit your comments on this article
Home Front: WoT
White House ordered plans prepared for Iran strike – report
2019-01-14
[IsraelTimes] ’Shocked’ Pentagon acceded to request after Baghdad mortar attack in September that US blamed on Tehran-backed militias, Wall Street Journal says.

Following a September mortar attack near the US embassy in Baghdad that Washington blamed on Iran, US National Security Adviser John Bolton and the National Security Council he leads requested that the Pentagon provide options for striking Iran, the Wall Street Journal reported Sunday.

The Pentagon did so, though the report said it was not clear what became of those plans and how close such a potential strike actually was, or if US President Donald Trump
...New York real estate developer, described by Dems as illiterate, racist, misogynistic, and what ever other unpleasant descriptions they can think of, elected by the rest of us as 45th President of the United States...
 was even aware of the exchange.

Still, officials in the Pentagon and State Department were said to have been shocked by the offhand nature of the request ‐ to provide plans for military action against a major regional power in response to a minor attack that caused no casualties.
This is the same Pentagon that has plans on file to invade Canada, should that ever be needed? I’m shocked that they would be shocked.
"It definitely rattled people," a former bigwig in the administration told the paper. "People were shocked. It was mind-boggling how cavalier they were about hitting Iran."
Cavalier. Take note, Mad Mullahs.
A front man for the NSC told the paper that the council "coordinates policy and provides the president with options to anticipate and respond to a variety of threats."

Bolton is known for his particularly hawkish stances, and prior to his appointment as national security adviser had advocated preemptive strikes against North Korea and war with Iran.
Did he indeed? Please do take note, Mad Mullahs. You too, Pudge.
In September he warned Iran of "hell to pay" and "serious consequences" if it acts against the US, using some of the most aggressive language employed by administration officials in recent decades.
Aggressive language with a Pentagon plan to back them...
He was also a major voice inside the George W. Bush administration in favor of the 2003 Iraq invasion. In the past he has also advocated for Israel bombing Iran to curtail its nuclear ambitions.
We’re gonna try to hold him back, guys, but he’s awfully excited. Y’all please, please don’t do anything to set him off, ‘k?
His combative approach to global conflict was previously seen as somewhat mitigated by the moderating voice of James Mattis, but the US defense secretary’s resignation last month has opened the door to more hardline policies by the administration.
Someone is messaging for all he, or she, is worth. Let us hope the Mad Mullahs — and Pudge — are clever enough to notice.
The mortar attack in Baghdad, on September 7, saw three shells hit the ultra-secure green zone, which houses Iraqi authorities and the US embassy.

Washington blamed militias supported by Iran, and said it would "respond swiftly and decisively in defense of American lives," though no action by US forces since has been directly linked to that attack.
But now General Mattis is not there to hold him back. Seriously, guys — worry.
Posted by:trailing wife

00:00