You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
To Woo a Skeptical Trump, Intelligence Chiefs Talk Economics Instead of Spies
2019-03-04
[NYT] WASHINGTON ‐ Intelligence officials who brief the president have warned him about Chinese espionage in bottom-line business terms. They have used Black Sea shipping figures to demonstrate the effect of Russia’s aggression in Ukraine. And they have filled the daily threat briefing with charts and graphs of economic data.

In an effort to accommodate President Trump, who has attacked them publicly as "naïve" and in need of going "back to school," the nation’s intelligence agencies have revamped their presentations to focus on subjects their No. 1 customer wants to hear about ‐ economics and trade.

Intelligence officers, steeped in how Mr. Trump views the world, now work to answer his repeated question: Who is winning? What the president wants to know, according to former officials, is what country is making more money or gaining a financial advantage.

While the professionals do not criticize Mr. Trump’s focus, they do question whether those interests are crowding out intelligence on threats like terrorism and the maneuvers of traditional adversaries, developments with foreign militaries or geopolitical events with international implications.
"If Trump tailors it to his needs, that is fine and his prerogative," Douglas H. Wise, a career C.I.A. official and a former top deputy at the Defense Intelligence Agency, said of the daily briefing. "However, if he suppresses intelligence through that tailoring, that is not helpful. He is no longer making informed decisions because he is making decisions based on information he could have had but didn’t have."

Presidents have long shaped their intelligence briefings based on their interests and the issues of the moment ‐ be it a Cold War with the Soviet Union or Al Qaeda and terrorism. Other presidents have also told intelligence agencies to focus more on economics. After his election, President Bill Clinton told his briefers that he wanted more economic information. And during the recession caused by the 2008 financial crisis, President Barack Obama had an economic intelligence briefing created to supplement the daily intelligence briefing.

Mr. Trump, finding traditional intelligence briefings less helpful than his predecessors, reduced the in-person briefings to about twice a week. Those sessions from Dan Coats, the director of national intelligence, and Gina Haspel, the C.I.A. director, now feature far more charts and visual aids to appeal to Mr. Trump, according to a senior intelligence official.

"President Trump’s economic focus has been evident, including his emphasis on increasing NATO allies’ burden sharing and pressing allies and partners to do more in support of our common interests," said Garrett Marquis, a spokesman for the National Security Council.

The written reports are still delivered daily to John R. Bolton, the national security adviser, who conveys the highlights to Mr. Trump on days when the intelligence chiefs are not at the Oval Office, according to a former official.
Posted by:Besoeker

#11  TW, I immediately thought of the aphorism about a man with a hammer.

Now, would anyone care to comment on why Trump might be skeptical of the IC? Hmmmmmmmmm?
Posted by: AlanC   2019-03-04 19:45  

#10  I'm so old I can remember when the intel chiefs were threatening not to brief the incoming Prez.

Yes, our first clue as to the Board of Directors of the Deep State.
Posted by: Besoeker   2019-03-04 18:37  

#9  I'm so old I can remember when the intel chiefs were threatening not to brief the incoming Prez.
(OK, that would make me about... three)
Posted by: SteveS   2019-03-04 17:40  

#8  Trump gets it. No wonder Capitol Washington DC hates him.
Posted by: Bugs Darling of the Wee Folk1353   2019-03-04 17:32  

#7  Not to be confused with a prior executive who lacked any understanding of economics outside of Marxism.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2019-03-04 15:36  

#6  But yes, the New York Times is trying to get mud to stick to the hated commander-in-chief. This paragraph from the piece entirely undermines their point, though:

Presidents have long shaped their intelligence briefings based on their interests and the issues of the moment ‐ be it a Cold War with the Soviet Union or Al Qaeda and terrorism. Other presidents have also told intelligence agencies to focus more on economics. After his election, President Bill Clinton told his briefers that he wanted more economic information. And during the recession caused by the 2008 financial crisis, President Barack Obama had an economic intelligence briefing created to supplement the daily intelligence briefing.


One must conclude either that this president is perfectly normal, or that he is extraordinarily strong willed in getting the agencies to give him what he needs instead of being trained to accept their usual way of doing things.
Posted by: trailing wife   2019-03-04 15:22  

#5  Specialists (Number 4s in the hierarchy) generally see things from within their soecialty, instead of the big picture. The ise and clever ones figure out how to present the information in a form their generalist/big picture bosses can use, instead of dwelling on all the to-them exciting details. I am very glad to hear that someone in the intelligence hierarchy has figured this out, no matter how much the lower level specialists might resent having to think outside their blinders.
Posted by: trailing wife   2019-03-04 15:03  

#4  Put in power during Osama Barry Obama. A deep state mole decrying Trump to misdirect from the attempted coup, sedition and yes, actual treason.
Posted by: Woodrow   2019-03-04 14:17  

#3  Since the intelligence agencies failed at their core purpose (predicting unexpected political events) at an almost 100% rate, President Trump is wise to force them to use a more updated and comparable metric.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2019-03-04 13:08  

#2  .... disgruntled former spook talking to NYT hacks to produce an article that concludes the president is a fool...aka more propaganda from the Deep State.

Continuing to do what they've always done.
Posted by: Besoeker   2019-03-04 12:18  

#1  Douglas H. Wise, a career C.I.A. official and a former top deputy at the Defense Intelligence Agency

Excuse me for wondering if this isn't some disgruntled former spook talking to NYT hacks to produce an article that concludes the president is a fool...aka more propaganda from the Deep State.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2019-03-04 12:16  

00:00