You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Science & Technology
NASA’s new moon rocket won’t be ready for 2020 launch
2019-03-14
[NYPOST] NASA’s top official says the space agency’s new rocket won’t be ready for a moon shot next year.

Administrator Jim Bridenstine told a Senate committee Wednesday he’s considering switching to commercial rockets to preserve the June 2020 launch date.

Bridenstine says two commercial rockets would be needed, one to launch the Orion capsule and its European-built service module, the other to launch an upper stage. Orion would have to dock with the upper stage in orbit around Earth, before heading to the moon.

NASA’s Space Launch System rocket could do everything in one fell swoop.
"For sure is cheaper in PX, GI, but PX no have!"
Bridenstine says NASA will decide in the next couple weeks whether to stick with its rocket and delay ‐ or go commercial for this one test flight.

Heh, Discussions here and many other places. To me the most interesting one was a two Falcon Heavy launch. The first launches the Orion space ship with the European attached unit to low earth orbit. The second launches an empty Falcon Heavy. The second stage would use almost no fuel in that scenario and have 80 to 90 tons of fuel available to it as there is no payload. It docks with the Orion EU unit and drives it to the moon. If the margins on the first launch are too tight for NASA do the EU unit as a third Falcon Heavy launch. A FH launch is $90 million so three launches would be $270 million. A Delta 4 Heavy launch is about 495 million and the SLS launch that is not happening as it is not on schedule is over $1 billion. So 3 FH's at $270 million is a massive cost savings. This is an un-crewed launch to test the Orion around the moon and it's heat shield for high speed re-entry from earth so it's a good cost savings plan.
For a 2 FH launch SpaceX might want to replace their strongback at Vandenberg with a new one able to support a FH. That would let them have two FH on the pad at the same time. 3 FH would require a delay so another rocket could be readied on a pad. The 2nd pad in Florida is not capable of launching FH rockets without modifications to it's flame trench that would put it out of service for a long time and disrupt lots of other launches.



Posted by:Fred

#9  >Waste. Of. Money. Time. Resources.

Oh totally agree. Moon landings messed up US economy for ages. USSR would have failed many years earlier if they did moon shot, rather than US wasting 5%GDP.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2019-03-14 23:03  

#8  I don't know, there's lots of congress critters I'd be happy to launch into space. We could build a giant railgun next to Hoover Dam and use it's power to charge it up. Then put the congress critters into metal cans and fire them into the sun.
Posted by: Silentbrick   2019-03-14 21:45  

#7  manned spaceflight seems to be the republican's panem et circensus

Other than people from certain congressional districts and employees of certain organizations, I really don't think many people who are haphazardly labelled "republicans" give much of a sh*t.

There is a blogger who you are not allowed to criticize by name around here who has a case of chronic priapism where anything involving a rocket with a person on top is concerned. That colors some people's thoughts on the matter.

Waste. Of. Money. Time. Resources.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2019-03-14 15:37  

#6  Hey, manned spaceflight seems to be the republican's panem et circensus.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2019-03-14 11:23  

#5  The only rockets that matter are ICBMs and comms / sensor satellite launches. Human rated space flight is a total waste of money.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2019-03-14 10:58  

#4  Before election!

Trump could generate more votes by shutting down unnecessary spending on ISS and other NASA boondoggles.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2019-03-14 02:47  

#3  Before election!
Posted by: 3dc   2019-03-14 02:14  

#2  No discussion at all of why the 2020 date is sacrosanct or why returning to the moon at all makes any sense.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2019-03-14 02:04  

#1  Orion would have to dock with the upper stage in orbit around Earth, before heading to the moon.
Wernher von Braun would say "I told you so!"
Posted by: magpie   2019-03-14 00:20  

00:00