You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Signs, Portents, and the Weather-
U.S. judge blocks drilling over climate change, casting doubt on Trump agenda
2019-03-21
(Reuters) - A U.S. judge has blocked oil drilling planned in Wyoming because the government failed to adequately consider its impact on global warming - a decision that could complicate President Donald Trump’s broader efforts to expand oil, gas and coal output on America’s public lands.

The ruling, by Judge Rudolph Contreras of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, was issued late on Tuesday, according to court documents.

It blocked drilling on more than 300,000 acres (121,400 hectares) in Wyoming until the Interior Department’s Bureau of Land Management conducts further analyses about how the development would impact climate change.

"Having reviewed the record and the relevant law, the Court concludes that - withholding judgment on whether BLM’s leasing decisions were correct - BLM did not sufficiently consider climate change when making those decisions," Judge Contreras wrote in the order.

Posted by:Besoeker

#14  The people in DC don't pay nearly enough for gas at the pump.
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain   2019-03-21 22:35  

#13  Another Obama judge ruling against Trump. Seems to me that almost all of them have been overturned.
Posted by: Woodrow   2019-03-21 16:06  

#12  We don't govern around theories.

The Marxists have been doing it for over a hundred years. The results speak for themselves.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2019-03-21 14:01  

#11  They could also drill through the flat earth.

Judge could stop them for that...
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2019-03-21 11:30  

#10  They do if they have an agenda.
Posted by: gorb   2019-03-21 11:24  

#9  Global warming is a THEORY you Naif.
We don't govern around theories.
Posted by: newc   2019-03-21 10:34  

#8  I'd love to hear this dork explain what he thinks is 'adequate consideration', as though there's an existing standard.
Posted by: Raj   2019-03-21 10:11  

#7  $10k isn't steep enough. One limb and an organ is more fitting
Posted by: Silentbrick   2019-03-21 09:52  

#6  Every time a single federal tyrant judge gets reversed over some partisan bullshit, they should fine them $10,000 for wasting the higher court's time.
Posted by: DarthVader   2019-03-21 09:05  

#5  So when it gets reversed in a higher court, the judge should allow faster drilling / pumping to make up the difference...
Posted by: M. Murcek   2019-03-21 08:46  

#4  Correct link vector to #3.
Posted by: Besoeker   2019-03-21 07:25  

#3  Wikipedia on the Judge
Posted by: 3dc   2019-03-21 06:40  

#2  Not surprised by this..He's buddies with Stzrok and had to recuse himself from the Mueller witch hunt.
Tool and partisan hack. This is his way of "resistance".
Posted by: Warthog   2019-03-21 05:46  

#1  There are nn climate change laws.
Posted by: Ebbavirt Clunk4147   2019-03-21 02:57  

00:00