You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
Offence against human body an offence against State: LHC
2019-08-16
[DAWN] The Lahore High Court has ruled that an offence against human body is though compoundable but at the same time it is an offence against the State for which the State machinery has to take steps for the prosecution of the offender.

Justice Anwarul Haq Pannun made this observation the other day while dismissing the petition of a man challenging an order to exhume the body of his wife allegedly killed by accidental fire shot. Mother of the dear departed woman had secured the order for the exhumation from a judicial magistrate concerned of Shakargarh.

Petitioner Safarish Ali pleaded that a magisterial court had already dismissed an application for exhumation of the body filed by investigating officer of the local police as none of the legal heirs of the dear departed wanted autopsy.

The judge, in his verdict, dismissed the plea and noted delinquency on the part of the police for not holding an inquiry into the incident independently as required under section 174 of Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C) despite ordered by the magistrate.

Related:
Lahore High Court: 2019-08-04 LHC hands over minor domestic worker to parents
Lahore High Court: 2019-07-25 Man nominated in attempted murder case killed in successful murder case at Lahore district kachehri
Lahore High Court: 2019-07-19 SC issues notice to TLP chief Khadim Rizvi on Punjab govt's petition for bail cancellation
Posted by:Fred

#4  his wife allegedly killed by accidental fire shot

It's a great game with friends, especially if you're not driving after.

Also, Lex you're crazy.☺
Posted by: Dron66046   2019-08-16 16:59  

#3  Muslim Logic.
Posted by: Marilyn Thud8495   2019-08-16 07:17  

#2  It's though compoundable! Isn't that clear for you?
Posted by: Clanter Dribble4001   2019-08-16 03:42  

#1  Very confusing. So the offense is ... the state of her body, or the body of evidence of said offense? Or a body that had lain in state?
Or a statement embodying a failed state whose body politic offends theeand if the body offends thee, pluck it out - or is that the wrong body of text, wrong Book?
Posted by: Lex   2019-08-16 01:17  

00:00