| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Politix |
| Desperately Smearing Amy Coney Barrett |
| 2020-01-20 |
| [Reason] Slate has started a new series, "Trump Bench," in which Mark Joseph Stern profiles the records of prominent Trump judicial nominees. In his latest installment for this series, Stern examines the "appalling record" of Judge Amy Coney Barrett, and it's a mess. To be clear, the mess is not Barrett's record, but Stern's treatment of it. Stern's account is misleading and inaccurate, and not remotely fair-minded. I was going to detail some of the many problems with Stern's piece, but Ed Whelan beat me to it. In two posts, here and here, Whelan catalogs the numerous instances in which Stern omits relevant context, mischaracterizes cases, and seeks to unjustly smear Barrett at every turn. Taken as a whole, the critique is fairly devastating. If Stern responds to Whelan's critique, I'll post a link, but based upon my familiarity with several of the cases under discussion, and Barrett's record more broadly, I doubt there's much of a defense to make. In the meantime, for those who want a fairer picture of Judge Barrett, I'd suggest going straight to the source, reading her opinions and law review articles, and perhaps watching this lecture that she gave at the Case Western Reserve University School of Law last year. More evidence, perhaps, that RBG won't be with us much longer. This and impeachment certainly have the odor of prepping the battlefield. Amy Coney Barrett is one of the top contenders to replace RBG. |
| Posted by:Iblis |
| #3 Yeah, but not live puppies, right? |
| Posted by: Bobby 2020-01-20 10:24 |
| #2 I heard she put puppies in a blender. |
| Posted by: SteveS 2020-01-20 09:52 |
| #1 The dems slander machine knows no limits. |
| Posted by: 49 Pan 2020-01-20 09:08 |