You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Land of the Free
Mike Huckabee Sues Florida Authorities for Threatening to Arrest Him on His Private Beach
2020-04-11
[LawAndCrime] Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee (R) and several of his neighbors ‐ whose properties on the Gulf Coast of Florida have private beaches ‐ have filed a federal lawsuit challenging a county government ordinance which temporarily closes all beaches. The county took the step in response to the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic. Huckabee and his neighbors claim the order prevents them from "being able to use or even set foot in their own backyards."

The lawsuit, filed Monday in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida against Walton County and its sheriff, claims that the local government's efforts to enforce the social distancing measure violates the property owners' constitutional rights.

According to the complaint, the county, its sheriff, its code enforcement officers, and the South Walton, Fla. Fire District "have been and are currently patrolling and occupying the private beachfront properties" without permission and threatening to "arrest or fine Plaintiffs, their family members, or invitees on their private properties."

The plaintiffs have requested that the court issue an injunction blocking the county from enforcing the ordinance. They argue that the order was illogical and would actually increase the spread of the virus.

"The Amended Ordinance is arbitrary and capricious. The Amended Ordinance purports to be designed to ‘prevent the spread of COVID-19' yet it has the opposite effect," Plaintiffs wrote. Per them:

"The Amended Ordinance prevents the Plaintiffs, many of whom own residences along the beach, from utilizing their own backyards to quarantine or stay safe at home. The chances of a family or landowner catching or spreading COVID-19 is far less in his or her own private backyard (where no one else should be less they be trespassing) than traveling to the grocery store or hardware store or other essential business."

Huckabee and his neighbors asked the court to declare that the ordinance constitutes a "temporary taking" of their private property in violation of the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and to issue an injunction rendering the ordinance unenforceable. The Plaintiffs also asked the judge to grant them "just compensation and attorney fees" from the county and sheriff.

A hearing in the case is scheduled for Monday.
Posted by:Clem

#7  My personal thinking is, if you want to be NIMBY you better be able to afford and obtain a title to that back yard.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2020-04-11 13:30  

#6  Florida beach law - The state constitution says all beaches below the “mean high-water line,” or the wet sand, are public. Court cases have found that the public has the right to the dry sand parts of beaches in two instances:

One is if the public has established a “prescriptive easement,” using a particular beach for the past 20 years without objection from private landowners.
The other is through “customary use,” which is the “ancient,” peaceful use of the beach by the public.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2020-04-11 13:26  

#5  Eminent domain in the United States
Posted by: Skidmark   2020-04-11 13:23  

#4  I'm pretty conservative when it comes to private property rights, but I'm reminded of Colorado, where landowners are required to allow access to fishing streams. They can own the land you have to cross to get to the stream, but the stream is public property. If there's a fence, the property owner has to install a gate or a set of steps to get through or over the fence.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2020-04-11 13:23  

#3  I hear ya, but private property is private property, be it the beach or on 5th Avenue in NYC.
But, exactly, just where does this end? People a little here and a little there is o.k., until it's too late.
Posted by: Clem   2020-04-11 10:24  

#2  The issue cuts both ways. On the one hand I'm not that fond of the beach itself being privately owned. I'm always happy when the courts kick some lefty in the nuts over trying to do that as has been happening in California. OTOH, once they are telling you what you can do in your own back yard, who actually thinks it will stop there? Wasn't it always lefties crying about "don't tell me what I can do in my own bedroom?" Well, how bout the living room and kitchen then too? The thought crime crowd is already trying to decide what you can and can't do inside your own head.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2020-04-11 10:10  

#1  I'm surprised that this sort of push back hasn't been happening before. Enough is enough with these petty tyrants.
Posted by: AlanC   2020-04-11 07:20  

00:00