You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Lurid Crime Tales-
Judge To DoJ: Not So Fast On Flynn Withdrawal
2020-05-14
An interesting round up and analysis of current maneuvers in this case.
[HotAir] When the Department of Justice moved to dismiss the case against Michael Flynn, that the change put Judge Emmet Sullivan in an awkward position. Sullivan had at one point during the case, and to force Flynn to keep working with prosecutors, even though the DoJ had already proclaimed themselves satisfied with his cooperation. The sudden reversal by the DoJ has lots of potential to embarrass Sullivan as people examine this case in the future.

Therefore, how surprising is it that Sullivan might want to

A federal judge overseeing the criminal case of President Trump’s former national security adviser Michael T. Flynn opened the door late Tuesday for legal experts and other outside parties to oppose the Justice Department’s motion to drop the case, suggesting he has at least some skepticism about the government’s argument that Mr. Flynn should never have been charged.

In a brief order, Judge Emmet G. Sullivan of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia said he would set a schedule for outside parties to present arguments about the government’s request to dismiss the case. He did not directly address the Justice Department’s motion to drop the charge, but legal experts said he appeared open to considering not only the department’s arguments but also those who have challenged its move as politically motivated.

This is, at the very least, quite curious in a criminal prosecution at the district-court level. Amicus briefs usually don’t apply to criminal trials, although technically the Flynn case is at the sentencing phase, where other testimony might be heard on mitigation or punishment. A dismissal motion by prosecutors, however, amounts to a forfeit by the only entity with authority to pursue a case. Sullivan might not like it, but how does he sustain a prosecution without the prosecuting authority’s cooperation, regardless of how many amicus briefs might cross his threshold? Judges in the American legal system don’t have that authority, which explicitly resides in the executive branch.

Related from the Washington Examiner, courtesy of Lex: 'Let the ObamaGate Games Begin: Judge in Flynn case reverses stand, welcomes amicus briefs from Obama shills
Related:
Emmet Sullivan: 2020-05-10 President Obama Declares ‘There Is No Precedent That Anybody Can Find’ For The Flynn Motion [He May Want To Call Eric Holder]
Emmet Sullivan: 2020-02-11 Judge Cancels General Flynn's Sentencing …Until Further Notice!
Emmet Sullivan: 2019-12-17 Judge rejects claims by Trump ex-adviser Flynn of FBI misconduct
Posted by:g(r)omgoru

#32  hoist wit 'is own petard
Posted by: Lex   2020-05-14 22:48  

#31  Obama was first to bring up the perjury charge.
Posted by: Grunter   2020-05-14 22:42  

#30  Thanks, b.
Posted by: Lex   2020-05-14 19:07  

#29  #17 link fixed.
Posted by: trailing wife   2020-05-14 19:05  

#28  D for Destruction
D for Denial
D for Delay
D for Democrats
Posted by: Lex   2020-05-14 19:05  

#27  They are trying to run out the clock in terms of protecting Biden and smearing Trump any way they can into the election season.

The precedent is already there in the DC Court Of Appeals that binds this jusdge to accept the dismissal. Legally speking, he has no choice. This is all about creating smoke and noise and delay.
Posted by: Marilyn Tojo7566   2020-05-14 18:54  

#26  Operational linkie to John's numma 17.
Posted by: Besoeker   2020-05-14 18:46  

#25  #17 John - link doesn't work
Posted by: Lex   2020-05-14 18:44  

#24  We are witnessing the Perfect Military IO, Information Operation Campaign, by Gen Flynn. He played them and they are voluntarily queuing themselves up to the Gallows.. What Fun!!! They (CIV) have no idea of the warrior spirit.....
Posted by: Joe of the Jungle   2020-05-14 17:32  

#23  I'm hoping the judge is going to get briefs from any crazy lefty willing to submit one, then release Flynn as none of the briefs are going to be compelling law. This will delay things until more lefties accept the reality and cool down, and give him statesman-like non-partisan status of saying he gave everyone a shot to make their case before agreeing to the dismissal.

This will enable him to avoid wearing a bullet proof vest the rest of his life.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2020-05-14 14:05  

#22  Thought Sullivan was better than this based on the Stevens case a few decades back. Turns out, he's not.

If memory serves, he only threw out that case after Stevens was defeated in the 2008 Senate race. Mission accomplished.


I was tempted to point out that this precedent, if accepted, could render all future plea bargains inoperative -- but then I remembered that the left never applies its own rules to itself -- and the Right never does so when they are "in charge", Kurt Schlicter's fulminations to the contrary.
Posted by: charger   2020-05-14 13:59  

#21  This Judge for life knowe his job isn’t really in jeopardy so being overturned on appeal with a scoulding from a higher court is meaningless to him. What he will do is find Flynn guilty and sentence him to confinement of some duration hoping to force Trump to issue a pardon to give cover to this disgraceful abuse of power for the upcoming elections. The Flynn conviction was the sole concrete “proof” of the whole spy gate conspiracy. For the rubes that constitutes the backbone of the democrat/progressive socialist coalition, they need a talking point.
Posted by: NoMoreBS   2020-05-14 13:12  

#20  Judge Sullivan called Flynn 'a traitor' earlier in this case and then was forced to apologize.

He may still hold a grudge.
Posted by: lord garth   2020-05-14 12:08  

#19  He's taking revenge for the defeat of his side on an enemy POW.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2020-05-14 11:42  

#18  It's possible he is suffering from dementia. My first reaction is too strong to print, and am hoping mere dementia or loss of faculties is the root cause.
Posted by: Whiskey Mike   2020-05-14 11:41  

#17   Supreme Court Ruled Unanimously Last Week Against Improper Use of Amicus Briefs; Relevant for Flynn Case.

Stay on the page and keep up Judge.
Posted by: JohnQC   2020-05-14 11:36  

#16  Impeach him.
Posted by: Woodrow   2020-05-14 10:27  

#15  fwiw, the retired (John Gleeson) appointed by Sullivan wrote an op ed in the WaPo calling for Flynn to be found guilty even though the DOJ found otherwise. This was the day before the appointment.

golly gee
what a coincidence
Posted by: lord garth   2020-05-14 10:09  

#14  Through the Looking Glass now.

Sullivan = Queen of Hearts' little brother
Posted by: Lex   2020-05-14 08:42  

#13  The DOJ and Flynn's lawyers should appeal for an immediate dismissal of the case. The evidence shows there was no crime, not even a process "crime", but this judge wants to act as if there was.

Imagine an accused murdered pleading guilty just to end the doubt and save himself from the death sentence, and then the supposed victim turns up alive. Sullivan would put an innocent man in prison for trying to save his life.
Posted by: Rob Crawford   2020-05-14 08:28  

#12  Clinton appointed black-robed tyrant practicing lawfare. Ya got to wonder who has what on him.

If government wants to dismiss a case, the district court cannot refuse.

Thought Sullivan was better than this based on the Stevens case a few decades back. Turns out, he's not.
Posted by: JohnQC   2020-05-14 08:18  

#11  SS?
Posted by: Lex   2020-05-14 08:01  

#10  /\ kabuki^2

Line dance clogging.
Posted by: Besoeker   2020-05-14 07:59  

#9  It's now kabuki^2
Posted by: M. Murcek   2020-05-14 07:37  

#8  "...appointed a retired judge..."

What, do retired judges have hip-pocket orders?
Snark O'The Day
Posted by: Clem   2020-05-14 06:14  

#7  Power without accountability.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2020-05-14 03:38  

#6  It gets worse: Judge Sullivan has now appointed a retired judge to look into “whether the Court should issue an Order to Show Cause why Mr. Flynn should not be held in criminal contempt for perjury.

All hands on deck. Gotta protect "The Won".
Posted by: Phusotle Dingle5823   2020-05-14 01:52  

#5  /\ Just thinking 'outside the box' here, but is it possible that U.S. Attorney John Durham might have signaled a strategic pause with regard to the sentencing of Mike Flynn ?
Posted by: Besoeker   2020-05-14 01:48  

#4  if Flynn were to be found guilty of perjury for pleading 'guilty' and then changing his plea, it would be a Kafkaesque precedent

It was weird enough when the government asked to delay sentencing. Twice. After Flynn plead guilty.
Posted by: SteveS   2020-05-14 01:40  

#3  Will Judge Sullivan drag the case past November hoping for a Dem controlled regime?
Posted by: Phusotle Dingle5823   2020-05-14 01:04  

#2  if Flynn were to be found guilty of perjury for pleading 'guilty' and then changing his plea, it would be a Kafkaesque precedent

having a special council brought in to oppose the government motion to dismiss, given the government has stated its reasons for the dismissal, is only irrational and senseless
Posted by: lord garth   2020-05-14 00:44  

#1  Black robed tyrant.

Rope, tree, judge. Some assembly required.
Posted by: DarthVader   2020-05-14 00:26  

00:00