You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Government Corruption
Pentagon loosens access rules to Special Access Programs (SAPS)
2021-09-29
[Washington Times] The Pentagon has revised rules that will make it easier for political appointees and congressional staffers to gain access to the Defense Department’s most secret programs, raising concerns among security officials.

Deputy Defense Secretary Kathleen Hicks issued a memorandum to senior Pentagon officials on Sept. 20 stating that filling out a counterintelligence questionnaire is no longer required to gain access to special access programs. Known as SAPs, these are the most secret activities and programs within the department.

The eased rules specifically allow Senate-confirmed political appointees, members of the House and Senate, the professional staff of the congressional defense and intelligence oversight committees and senior White House officials access to the programs without filling out a prescreening questionnaire as required for all other officials in the Pentagon’s Special Access Security Manual: Personnel Security.

Also exempted from the prescreening questionnaire are national security advisers to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, and Senate Majority Leader Charles E. Schumer and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell.

A Pentagon official said the rule change could be "devastating" to the protection of highly sensitive programs.

Security officials "see this as a front-door or quasi-sanctioning method that will invite leaks, as previous measures affording proper protection of highly protected information are eliminated," the official said.

Special access programs are classified above the top-secret level and are reserved to protect the most sensitive information.

Hillary Clinton, a secretary of state in the Obama administration, received criticism for putting information from a special access program on her private email server, according to government documents related to a subsequent investigation. The sensitive information involved criteria to authorize drone strikes on terrorists.

I. Charles McCullough III, serving as inspector general of the intelligence committee, disclosed the compromise of this high-level information in January 2016.

Another program involved the enemy-targeting radar frequency for surface-to-air missile systems in Iraq. The information required secrecy to protect the lives of U.S. pilots.

The Pentagon defended the decision to ease the rules.
Related:
Special access program: 2016-01-19 Beest's Emails Contained SAP (Special Access Program) Info, Sez IG
Special access program: 2006-07-11 The Times Distorts Rep. Hoekstra's Letter on Intelligence
Special access program: 2006-01-11 Risen's source identified
Posted by:Besoeker

#6  ...wouldn’t...
Posted by: NoMoreBS   2021-09-29 20:04  

#5  Yet another reason why any foreign intelligence agency or government with a lick of sense would share any serious Humint or SigInt source with us now. Nobody has better access to Rumint and Remote viewing than we do however. The ISI and Savak2 sell us only the best of it. My guess is the Frogs and the Krauts just giggle in the background.
Posted by: NoMoreBS   2021-09-29 20:03  

#4  Is it possible that these SAP requirements are being relaxed to soften and protect any possible malfeasance done by the HildaBeest and others? The Durham indictment of Sussman mentioned Hillary Clinton, the Clinton foundation and alluded to others unnamed in the intelligence community, Big Tech and some unnamed university doing contract work.
Posted by: JohnQC   2021-09-29 10:57  

#3  Years ago I was involved in some strategic planning/marketing plans for a major bank. At one point we were talking about security, and someone asked the question of what we would do if one of our competitors got hold of our plans. One other member said, "It would serve them right."

Given the recent performance of our military, I could only hope that some of our enemies would copy our tactics and performance.
Posted by: Tom   2021-09-29 10:21  

#2  Remembering Senator Pat "Leaky" Leahy... no, no way, no how.
Posted by: magpie   2021-09-29 10:16  

#1  A Pentagon official said the rule change could be "devastating" to the protection of highly sensitive programs.

"Devastating" also to the people associated with those programs, but perhaps that is a secondary goal. The primary goad being the elimination of SAP programs and elements.

No benefit to our National Security will be realized through these action.

Posted by: Besoeker   2021-09-29 03:29  

00:00