| Submit your comments on this article |
| -Land of the Free |
| IRS Abandons Plans to Require Third-Party Facial Recognition |
| 2022-02-08 |
| [ET] The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) will not use a third-party company to verify new accounts with facial recognition, the agency announced on Monday in a news release. The proposed move, which would have used the company ID.me, was criticized resoundingly by privacy advocates and some members of Congress, who say the technology is flawed and would not recognize users if they experienced significant physical changes. Previously, the IRS said it would use the software to cut down on fraudulent accounts. The IRS "will transition away from using a third-party service for facial recognition to help authenticate people creating new online accounts," according to its news release. "The transition will occur over the coming weeks in order to prevent larger disruptions to taxpayers during filing season." At the same time, the agency continued, it will "bring online an additional authentication process that does not involve facial recognition." It’s not exactly clear how that will be accomplished ahead of the tax-filing deadline in mid-April. "The IRS takes taxpayer privacy and security seriously, and we understand the concerns that have been raised," said IRS Commissioner Chuck Rettig in a statement. "Everyone should feel comfortable with how their personal information is secured, and we are quickly pursuing short-term options that do not involve facial recognition." The IRS’s change will "not interfere" with taxpayers’ capability to file their tax returns or pay the taxes owed, the agency confirmed. "During this period, the IRS will continue to accept tax filings, and it has no other impact on the current tax season. People should continue to file their taxes as they normally would," said the IRS. Some members of Congress hailed the move on Monday. |
| Posted by:Besoeker |
| #6 Married in 2003, she divorced in 2014 from Tony Podesta |
| Posted by: Frank G 2022-02-08 21:00 |
| #5 ID.ME Lobbying and $$$$ Interesting to note the name Heather Podesta works for one of the lobbying firms used frequently by ID.me called Invariant LLC. Is she distant family to the WH. Podesta? |
| Posted by: NN2N1 2022-02-08 20:46 |
| #4 I wonder which Congressweasels owned shares of ID.me before this sunlight disinfected the plan? *There* is an insightful question. I'd like to know the answer to that. |
| Posted by: SteveS 2022-02-08 11:24 |
| #3 I wonder which Congressweasels owned shares of ID.me before this sunlight disinfected the plan? |
| Posted by: Frank G 2022-02-08 08:40 |
| #2 Remember it took the internet blogs and sources to give this the true exposure it needed. Where was the MSM? However now the question about the IRS comment... "...will transition away from... indicating they already are and have used such services. What will they do with the collected data and whom have they shared it with? ... will they erase it or sell it also. |
| Posted by: NN2N1 2022-02-08 07:26 |
| #1 Bad timing. Too many references to Voter ID. Too many probing questions. Ever notice the scant level of discussion regarding the COVID origins and possible work or research connections to Fort Detrick or the UK, Defense Establishment BIO center at Porton Down? Yea, me too. In polite circles, we generally discuss planetary warming. |
| Posted by: Besoeker 2022-02-08 00:45 |