You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia
Francis Fukuyama: Well, he's been right before? Or not...
2022-03-13
[American Purpose] Preparing for defeat

I’m writing this from Skopje, North Macedonia, where I’ve been for the last week teaching one of our Leadership Academy for Development courses. Following the Ukraine war is no different here in terms of available information, except that I’m in an adjacent time zone, and the fact that there is more support for Putin in the Balkans than in other parts of Europe. A lot of the latter is due to Serbia, and Serbia's hosting of Sputnik.

I’ll stick my neck out and make several prognostications:

Russia is heading for an outright defeat in Ukraine. Russian planning was incompetent, based on a flawed assumption that Ukrainians were favorable to Russia and that their military would collapse immediately following an invasion. Russian soldiers were evidently carrying dress uniforms for their victory parade in Kyiv rather than extra ammo and rations. Putin at this point has committed the bulk of his entire military to this operation—there are no vast reserves of forces he can call up to add to the battle. Russian troops are stuck outside various Ukrainian cities where they face huge supply problems and constant Ukrainian attacks.

The collapse of their position could be sudden and catastrophic, rather than happening slowly through a war of attrition. The army in the field will reach a point where it can neither be supplied nor withdrawn, and morale will vaporize. This is at least true in the north; the Russians are doing better in the south, but those positions would be hard to maintain if the north collapses.

There is no diplomatic solution to the war possible prior to this happening. There is no conceivable compromise that would be acceptable to both Russia and Ukraine given the losses they have taken at this point.

The United Nations Security Council has proven once again to be useless. The only helpful thing was the General Assembly vote, which helps to identify the world’s bad or prevaricating actors.

The Biden administration’s decisions not to declare a no-fly zone or help transfer Polish MiGs were both good ones; they've kept their heads during a very emotional time. It is much better to have the Ukrainians defeat the Russians on their own, depriving Moscow of the excuse that NATO attacked them, as well as avoiding all the obvious escalatory possibilities. The Polish MiGs in particular would not add much to Ukrainian capabilities. Much more important is a continuing supply of Javelins, Stingers, TB2s, medical supplies, comms equipment, and intel sharing. I assume that Ukrainian forces are already being vectored by NATO intelligence operating from outside Ukraine.

The cost that Ukraine is paying is enormous, of course. But the greatest damage is being done by rockets and artillery, which neither MiGs nor a no-fly zone can do much about. The only thing that will stop the slaughter is defeat of the Russian army on the ground.

Putin will not survive the defeat of his army. He gets support because he is perceived to be a strongman; what does he have to offer once he demonstrates incompetence and is stripped of his coercive power?

The invasion has already done huge damage to populists all over the world, who prior to the attack uniformly expressed sympathy for Putin. That includes Matteo Salvini, Jair Bolsonaro, Éric Zemmour, Marine Le Pen, Viktor Orbán, and of course Donald Trump. The politics of the war has exposed their openly authoritarian leanings.
"i.e.: Everyone I don't like"
The war to this point has been a good lesson for China. Like Russia, China has built up seemingly high-tech military forces in the past decade, but they have no combat experience. The miserable performance of the Russian air force would likely be replicated by the People’s Liberation Army Air Force, which similarly has no experience managing complex air operations. We may hope that the Chinese leadership will not delude itself as to its own capabilities the way the Russians did when contemplating a future move against Taiwan.

Hopefully Taiwan itself will wake up as to the need to prepare to fight as the Ukrainians have done, and restore conscription. Let’s not be prematurely defeatist.

Turkish drones will become bestsellers.

A Russian defeat will make possible a "new birth of freedom," and get us out of our funk about the declining state of global democracy. The spirit of 1989 will live on, thanks to a bunch of brave Ukrainians.

Courtesy of 3dc:
[Twitter]
Posted by:M. Murcek

#13  as F says, at least Biden is handling the Ukraine situation better than the Afghanistan disengagement

Of course that is a very low bar.
Posted by: Lord Garth   2022-03-13 13:22  

#12  Fukuyama: I’ll stick my neck out and make several prognostications

Like this joker's "End of History" prognostication?

Or is Frank just fibbing again, as he did the last time there was Trouble in Neocon Paradise?
Posted by: No Fortunate Son   2022-03-13 13:14  

#11  The Biden administration’s decisions not to declare a no-fly zone or help transfer Polish MiGs were both good ones; they've kept their heads during a very emotional time.

Seriously, the Biden administration? Looked to me that they were trying to bait Poland into the transfer.
Posted by: davemac   2022-03-13 13:01  

#10  When I worked in Washington every policy maker I knew had a copy of that fairy tale prominently displayed in their offices
I read the danged thing and decided it was a wish list for foreign policy geeks
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom    2022-03-13 09:42  

#9  Preparing for DefeatFrancis Fukuyama


Oh FFS... not this idiot again. The "intellectual" who told us liberal democracy would sweep the world and bring about the "end of history" - the most retarded phrase coined by any intellectual since Marx and Engels. This was the delusion, as Mearsheimer puts it, behind the Nuland-Obama wrecking crew's idiotic pretension of being "21st century people."

The foolish doctrine of liberal internationalism has done such extraordinary damage to the US. This has killed more of our and the world's people, caused us to lose wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, helped ruin Libya and is the ultimate cause of the disaster in Ukraine.

God save us from neocon shitheads like Fukuyama. Go back to Palo Alto, little man. Enjoy your thruple with McFaul and Condi Rice
Posted by: No Fortunate Son   2022-03-13 09:26  

#8  All those "Chinese speaking Siberians, looking for protection from a madman" crying out to Xi?
Posted by: Frank G   2022-03-13 09:23  

#7  /\ Perhaps your excellent theory of potential Chinese Mongolian expansionism could be given some....negative economic encouragement.


Posted by: Besoeker   2022-03-13 09:19  

#6  Putin at this point has committed the bulk of his entire military to this operation—there are no vast reserves of forces he can call up

Just spit-balling here...
Xi looks at mighty Russian military:
a) producing copious amounts of fail
b) mostly sitting in the west of the country, leaving the east barebones.
c) pissing off almost all potential allies

Starts thinking about all that tundra and resources just sitting there for the taking.

Maybe. If China starts badmouthing Russia and/or sympathizing with Ukraine, that'll be a real indicator.
Posted by: Mercutio   2022-03-13 09:11  

#5  That's the "new order" and "completely different principles" the man is talking about in the last tweet.
Posted by: Omomolet Phutch9064   2022-03-13 08:34  

#4  After Russia is defeated, we'll break them up into small parts, easily dominated and the threat they pose to our rulers will be removed.

Then, the immigrants. Africa is bursting at the seams with people who want a new life. Russia is undergoing a demographic collapse. A massive importation of new people is exactly what is needed to rescue the former territory of the Russian Federation. Moreover it will ensure the Rus, a danger to the world since they were a people a thousand years ago, never emerge again.
Posted by: Omomolet Phutch9064   2022-03-13 08:33  

#3  The program sent nearly 2,000 locomotives and innumerable boxcars to the Soviet Union. In addition, almost half of all the rails used by the Soviet Union during the war came through Lend-Lease. - cite.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2022-03-13 08:03  

#2  /\ The Russians had the Wehrmacht directly up their arse until Uncle Sam came to their assistance. In 1948 the US, UK, and FR joined their sectors in an effort to unify the German people and heal the land. The Russians countered by cordoning off their sector and claiming it as a client state. How quickly the Russians had forgotten US and Allied assistance.

World War II Allies: U.S. Lend-Lease to the Soviet Union, 1941-1945

Even before the United States entered World War II in December 1941, America sent arms and equipment to the Soviet Union to help it defeat the Nazi invasion. Totaling $11.3 billion, or $180 billion in today’s currency, the Lend-Lease Act of the United States supplied needed goods to the Soviet Union from 1941 to 1945 in support of what Stalin described to Roosevelt as the “enormous and difficult fight against the common enemy — bloodthirsty Hitlerism.”

  • 400,000 jeeps & trucks
  • 14,000 airplanes
  • 8,000 tractors
  • 13,000 tanks
  • 1.5 million blankets
  • 15 million pairs of army boots
  • 107,000 tons of cotton
  • 2.7 million tons of petrol products
  • 4.5 million tons of food
  • Posted by: Besoeker   2022-03-13 07:46  

    #1  It took two years before the Russian army got its act together in ww2, it won at the end.
    Posted by: BernardZ   2022-03-13 04:24  

    00:00