You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia
5 reasons Russia has lost more generals in a month than US in 2 decades
2022-03-25
[YouTube] As per some estimates, the Russian military has deployed as many as 20 generals were deployed to lead Russia’s onslaught in Ukraine. Out of this, Russia has lost at least 5 generals in fighting in less than a month.

By comparison, the United States has lost two general officers during the Global War on Terror which has lasted for more than 20 years- Army Lt. Gen. Timothy Maude was killed at the Pentagon during the Sept. 11, 2001 attack and Army Maj. Gen. Harold Greene was killed in an Aug. 5, 2014 insider attack in Afghanistan.

The death of one general officer in combat is an incredibly rare thing, the death of multiple generals is almost unbelievable.
This can't be brushed aside as coincidence and multiple factors are at play.

In this video Defense Updates analyzes why Russia is losing so many military generals in Ukraine?
Posted by:DarthVader

#13  Could be, USSR doctrine shaped 3rd world?

If BLM could read that they would be very upset.
Posted by: DarthVader   2022-03-25 15:48  

#12  Apparently the Russians work along 3rd world lines.

Could be, USSR doctrine shaped 3rd world?
Posted by: swksvolFF   2022-03-25 14:01  

#11  Does diabetes count?
Posted by: swksvolFF   2022-03-25 13:34  

#10  historically western militaries push down the knowledge to the lowest person so that they know everything they need to do their job.

Third world militaries protect such info as some kind of power/status protection and to prevent mutiny's?

Apparently the Russians work along 3rd world lines.
Posted by: ruprecht   2022-03-25 11:47  

#9  during the Red Purge of 1936-38, Stalin had several dozen generals and tens of thousand of officers executed

as well as several hundred thousand civilians
Posted by: Lord Garth   2022-03-25 10:30  

#8  I wish we'd get rid of Milley. Same for most of the brass. If we'd gotten rid of Tommy Franks 20 years ago we'd be in a better place today
Posted by: Snakes Lover of the Veal Cutlets5809   2022-03-25 10:01  

#7  A circular firing squad is forming in the Kremlin, with everyone pointing their guns at each other: Vladimir Putin's regime looks under serious threat for the first time since he came to power, writes Professor MARK GALEOTTI
Posted by: Skidmark   2022-03-25 09:53  

#6  Putin 'loses his FIFTH general': Top Russian commander is killed in Ukrainian strike, military sources claim as Kyiv continues to take out Moscow's elite troops
Posted by: Skidmark   2022-03-25 09:51  

#5  ^ maybe if they had tossed the peacetime promotion system and gone full field performance we'd been better off. However, that wouldn't have been 'equitable', not that war is.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2022-03-25 09:21  

#4  One could argue that if we had lost (or at least misplaced) a few more generals along the way, then our military would be focused on warfighting instead of woke nonsense.
Posted by: SteveS   2022-03-25 09:04  

#3  They scurry about like cockroaches when the light shines upon them. Vindman a good example.
Posted by: Dale   2022-03-25 08:49  

#2  Our club here are shaking in their slippers. The swamp grows everywhere you have poor leadership.
Posted by: Dale   2022-03-25 08:47  

#1  Cause they're doing COL and LTC jobs. When you don't have an effective non-commissioned officer corps, you got officers doing those jobs. When you have LTs and CPTs doing NCO jobs, then MAJ and LTC do the company grade jobs, with COL and GEN doing battalion and brigade jobs much closer to the action.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2022-03-25 08:27  

00:00