You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Science & Technology
Can Ethanol Fuel Ever Live Up to Its Hype?
2023-05-10
[GIZMODO] This story was originally published by Grist. Sign up for Grist’s weekly newsletter here.

Two decades ago, when the world was wising up to the threat of climate change, the Bush administration touted ethanol — a fuel usually made from corn — for its threefold promise: It would wean the country off foreign oil, line farmers’ pockets, and reduce carbon pollution. In 2007, Congress mandated that refiners nearly quintuple the amount of biofuels mixed into the nation’s gasoline supply over 15 years. The Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, projected that ethanol would emit at least 20 percent fewer greenhouse gasses than conventional gasoline.

Scientists say the EPA was too optimistic, and some research shows that the congressional mandate did more climatic harm than good. A 2022 study found that producing and burning corn-based fuel is at least 24 percent more carbon-intensive than refining and combusting gasoline. The biofuel industry and the Department of Energy, or DOE, vehemently criticized those findings, which nevertheless challenge the widespread claim that ethanol is something of a magic elixir.

"There’s an intuition people have that burning plants is better than burning fossil fuels," said Timothy Searchinger. He is a senior researcher at the Center for Policy Research on Energy and the Environment at Princeton University and an early skeptic of ethanol. "Growing plants is good. Burning plants isn’t."

Given all that, not to mention the growing popularity of electric vehicles, you’d think ethanol is on the way out. Not so. Politicians across the ideological spectrum continue to tout it as a way to win energy independence and save the climate. The fuel’s bipartisan staying power has less to do with any environmental benefits than with disputed science and the sway of the biofuel lobby, agricultural economists and policy analysts told Grist.

"The only way ethanol makes sense is as a political issue," said Jason Hill, a bioproducts and biosystems engineering professor at the University of Minnesota.
Posted by:Besoeker

#13  works great in the stove on my boat!
Posted by: 746   2023-05-10 19:51  

#12  American Central Planning Failure
Posted by: mossomo   2023-05-10 13:03  

#11  An once again those of us called conspiracy nuts that took time to research the E90 E85 fuel process impact and the food denied millions are vindicated.

Btw: How are they gonna keep up with corn demands given the LSD agenda move to ban chemical based fertizers ?
Posted by: NN2N1   2023-05-10 12:44  

#10   Grow food. Drill oil.

Hey Pakistan!
Posted by: Skidmark   2023-05-10 12:17  

#9  Grow food. Drill oil.
Posted by: Super Hose   2023-05-10 12:13  

#8  No.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2023-05-10 10:08  

#7  back in the 2000s, it was expected that next generation ethanol or some other biofuel would be made from, say kelp or other easily grown plant and the fuel would be less expensive than gasoline

in fact, Congress mandated this (and provided research funding) in the Energy Policy Act of 2005 and the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 --- but this turned out to be a case where technology forcing policy failed almost completely
Posted by: lord garth   2023-05-10 09:19  

#6  If "the environment" = "my bank account," it is great.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2023-05-10 08:25  

#5  How can a combustion engine that runs poorly and gets fewer miles per-gallon on corn gas be better for the environment ?
Posted by: Besoeker   2023-05-10 08:21  

#4  No
Posted by: DarthVader   2023-05-10 08:09  

#3  The corn used for ethanol is not particularly palatable. Its cultivation does cut into land that could be used for food stocks, though.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2023-05-10 08:05  

#2  Ethanol has been a net-BTU loser (as in bad) in the production process.

But, I'm sure it bought some votes in the proverbial corn belt (and pissed off a lot of Mexicans with increased corn prices).
Posted by: DooDahMan   2023-05-10 08:03  

#1  No.
Posted by: Besoeker   2023-05-10 07:59  

00:01