You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Government Corruption
What TWA 800 Had in Common with Hunter B's Laptop
2023-07-17
[American Thinker] On July 17, 1996, TWA Flight 800 left JFK airport in New York City heading east to Paris. Twelve minutes after its 8:19 departure the doomed 747 blew up off the south coast of Long Island, killing all 230 souls aboard.

On August 23, 1996, the New York Times reported on its front page, above the fold right, "Prime Evidence Found That Device Exploded in Cabin of Flight 800." According to the Times, only the FBI’s uncertainty about whether the device was a bomb or a missile kept it from declaring TWA 800’s destruction a crime.

On that same day, above the fold left, was the headline, "Clinton Signs Bill Cutting Welfare; States in New Role."

The Clintons had an election to win. One of those storylines would have to go. A month later, the administration started floating the possibility of a mechanical failure, and the bomb and missile story lines, despite the "prime evidence," were allowed to die.

Legendary JFK press secretary and former U.S. senator Pierre Salinger knew better. A loyal enough Democrat, he sat on what he knew until it had lost its political punch. He broke his silence at an aviation conference in the French resort city of Cannes just two days after the November election.

There, Salinger told the assembled executives that he had "very important details that show the plane was brought down by a U.S. Navy missile." He added the obvious: "If the news came out that an American naval ship shot down that plane it would be something that would make the public very, very unhappy and could have an effect on the election."

Imagine that -- the intelligence community conspiring with the a Democratic administration and the Department of Justice to suppress information that might well have altered the outcome of a presidential election.

The media joined the conspiracy to make sure no one would ever dare to do in the future what Salinger had just done. The conspirators did not care what role Salinger had played in Camelot.

They were quick to swat him out of the Kennedy pantheon. The FBI, the White House, the Navy, all took a shot. Salinger was unready for the assault. The media found the subject irresistible. In the month of November 1996 alone, the New York Times ran four articles with headlines that mocked Salinger.
Posted by:Besoeker

#7  The NTSB made the records of civilian and military radar available in 2000. There was clearly a fuel tank explosion. No missile was detected by radar. Of course a very small missile wouldn't have a good radar signature, but a very small missile wouldn't have led to a fuel tank explosion unless it hit exactly the right spot.
Posted by: lord garth    2023-07-17 19:47  

#6  Does it matter, does a pointless debate change things?

It matters if the FBI covered it up...especially for purposes of swaying the electorate.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2023-07-17 13:25  

#5  I remember radio talk shows and all the call-in witnesses to this event.

Missile or Bomb? Who cares, everyone gets a ribbon. Innocents died that day and it was covered up. Something odd happened and people on the ground saw it. However described: aliens, missile, bomb. Does it matter, does a pointless debate change things? Something happened that day out of the ordinary, innocents died, people called in to report witnessing it, and then it was covered up.
Posted by: mossomo   2023-07-17 13:07  

#4  
#3 ^ So you are saying it was aliens, Mike?
Posted by: SteveS 2023-07-17 08:48


...Steve,

Shhhh...watch the skies. ;)

Mike
Posted by: MikeKozlowski   2023-07-17 08:57  

#3  ^ So you are saying it was aliens, Mike?
Posted by: SteveS   2023-07-17 08:48  

#2  As soon as the name Pierre Salinger showed up, the article fell apart.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2023-07-17 08:20  

#1  ...Sighs...

(pulls out whiteboard)

It. Wasn't. A. Missile.

A Stinger - even had it been launched at a perfect position (which would be out on the water, and not one witness ever reported the flash you would have seen as the rocket motor ignited) could not have reached Flight 800. Flight 800 was too high for a Stinger to have reached, and even if it somehow had gotten there, a Stinger warhead could NOT have killed the entire airplane; it is simply too small. Remember KAL 007 - hit by a air-to-air missile intended to kill bombers, and though it did go down, it stayed in the air for a minute or so.

No, a STANDARD SAM launched by a US Navy ship did not shoot it down. The USN has live fire ranges for SAM launches...hundreds of miles from Long Island. A missile launch close enough to go after TWA 800 would have lit up the coast for miles around, a detail no one ever seems to report seeing. The missile's exhaust would have been visible for miles as well.

In both cases, the warhead explosion would have resembled a fireworks display. This detail was not reported by any witnesses.

In the case of a USN SAM doing it, please explain to me how literal HUNDREDS of people would have been involved and no one has ever said a word.

Wasn't a missile. Full stop. You can make an argument for a bomb aboard the aircraft or some bizarre malfunction, but THAT'S IT.

Mike
Posted by: MikeKozlowski   2023-07-17 08:17  

00:00