You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Science & Technology
1 in 35 Who Got Boosted Developed Myocarditis, Study Finds.
2023-07-29
[NationalPulse] One in 35 people who received the COVID-19 mRNA booster vaccinations had vaccine-associated myocardial injury, according to a peer-reviewed, industry-independent study from the University of Basel.

The study, which is due to be published in the highly accredited open-access journal of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology, aimed to identify the incidence rate and symptoms of myocardial injury — inflammation of the heart muscle — after mRNA booster vaccinations.

The study found that myocardial vaccine-associated injury was "much more common than previously thought," occurring in one out of every 35 people — around 2.8 percent. The symptoms were found to be mostly mild and transient.

These results were broken down further, finding myocardial injury "significantly more often" in women than men, with a median age of 46 years old. Women developed symptoms at a rate of 3.7 percent, whereas men developed symptoms at 0.8 percent. This may be explained by the "higher vaccine dose per body weight or myocardial mass in women and therefore dose-dependent toxic effects," the study suggests.

"If regulators around the world don’t take notice of the information... then they are at best, in my view negligent, at worst they don’t wanna think about it," states Dr. John Campbell, who adds:

"This is a range of adverse reaction that is off the scale in healthcare: off the scale."
How does this compare to other vaccines that got approved? Without hard numbers I cannot judge whether or howmuch I should be appalled.

Posted by:The Walking Unvaxed

#7  When I think of numbers I trust, things like c, Planck's Constant and Avogadro's Number come to mind.

Any statistical "data" you see had to be collected by someone. Last I checked they all have an agenda.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2023-07-29 10:48  

#6  Suit yourself, the numbers don't lie.
Posted by: The Walking Unvaxed   2023-07-29 10:36  

#5  ^ Yep...
Posted by: M. Murcek   2023-07-29 10:13  

#4  according to a peer-reviewed, industry-independent study

That Sir, is an opinion.
Posted by: Skidmark   2023-07-29 09:53  

#3  FWIW, the results of the study are facts, not opinion. It's time the mods here drop covid stories somewhere other than Page 4.
Posted by: The Walking Unvaxed   2023-07-29 09:24  

#2  So while the given Vaxccident number is 2.8%

The given estimates of 393 Million privately owned US firearms in 2022
and even using data from a clearly Anti-Firearm source.

It shows us the odds of getting wounded by a US Firearm is 132.07 x's LESS likely than getting wounded by the Vaxccident.


Vaxccident is about 2.8% vs. US Firearm wounded is roughly about 0.0212% .
Posted by: NN2N1   2023-07-29 07:26  

#1  Women developed symptoms at a rate of 3.7 percent, whereas men developed symptoms at 0.8 percent.

Women hit hardest. Looks like they haven't examined children, who didn't even need the jab, yet.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2023-07-29 07:19  

00:00