You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia
Maersk Shipping Backs Away From US Military Contracts
2023-09-26
[gCaptain] by Captain John Konrad (gCaptain) In a world where the Pacific is becoming a cauldron of geopolitical tensions and Russia’s actions in Ukraine highlight the paramount importance of military logistics, the strategic chessboard is experiencing moves that are unparalleled. Maersk, the Danish maritime behemoth and a principal commercial transportation partner for the U.S. military, has chosen to divest its U.S. flagged tanker fleet along with select U.S. military contracts to Maritime Partners, a relatively minor entity operating under the Jones Act. Concurrently, the company is escalating its investments gloablly including in China, prompting speculations into whether these developments are interconnected. The answer is not so simple.

Maersk’s journey with U.S. flagged ships got a boost with the acquisition of SeaLand in 1999, a company established by the pioneer of containerization, Malcom McLean. This acquisition merged SeaLand with Maersk Lines Limited, a U.S.-based subsidiary managing both the fleet and military contracts. Maersk’s commitment to supporting its U.S.-flagged fleet has until recently, been unwavering, offering thousands of union jobs to U.S. Merchant Mariners over the years including the crew aboard Captain Philip’s ill-fated ship Maersk Alabama.

However, with rising geopolitical tensions and the US government’s renewed focus on maritime policy, the US Maritime Administration (MARAD) is emerging from decades of neglect with few additional resources to manage relationships. This is evident in the stark contrast between MARAD, which has only 800 staff members, and its sister agency, the Federal Aviation Administration, which employs 45,000 people. As a result, the US Government — including MARAD, the Biden administration and Congress — is now facing a complex set of challenges that are hindering companies like Maersk from strengthening America’s maritime industry. An industry is increasingly important for a military facing severe logistical challenges in the Black and South China Seas.

When asked about investments in China vs the United states Ed Hanley, Vice President Maersk Line Limited, said the company has been expanding strategically to better serve the North American market. In 2020, Maersk acquired Performance Team to strengthen its presence. In 2021, it acquired Visible Supply Chain Management to enhance its supply chain capabilities. In 2022, Maersk incorporated Pilot Freight Services into its portfolio.

According to Hanley, Maersk executive interviewed by gCaptain today, the company plans to maintain its support and investment in container services and the US Maritime Security Program. However, it has already divested its critical tanker fleet and contracts to manage military grey hull ships. Maersk also was clear the recent divestiture of sale of assets received the approval of key military stakeholders including the US Maritime Administration (MARAD), Military Sealift Command (MSC) and the US Transportation Command (TRANSCOM).

How critical are those assets to the US Military? Very.
Posted by:Besoeker

#6  Very good time to tell a kid going the trade school route to consider machinist.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2023-09-26 13:58  

#5  Ref # 3
Add to that the utter reliance on "just in time" manufacturing and shipment. There are no longer the huge warehouses if inventory awaiting shipment that could absorb delays and hiccups in product availability at the retail outlets. Now the creation of that can of Campbell's tomato soup is directly linked to the cash register swipe at Wally World, with inventory en route constituting the bulk of product extant. The systems elasticity, huge in the pre-computer/internet era, has been sized down to very thin margins. Worse, whole market systems are totally reliant on electronic inter-connectivity for shipping, handling and customer tracking/billing/accounts management. If a manual system were needed as a result of huge hacking/denial/cyber-warfare attacks by the folks in Guangzhu, I suspect most companies are clueless and/or lack a backup plan.
Posted by: NoMoreBS   2023-09-26 13:03  

#4  Maybe COSCO can backfill them in MSC
Posted by: Slenter Panda4300   2023-09-26 11:50  

#3  And then we'll see the impact of long logistics line breakage.
Posted by: Skidmark   2023-09-26 11:25  

#2  A reminder that in a big shooting war between China and the US, merchant shipping is going to get basically wiped out in the early going.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2023-09-26 10:18  

#1  The sinking of the Russian warship Moskva and the vulnerability of big ships may have begun to have an impact on contracts.
Posted by: Besoeker   2023-09-26 10:16  

00:00