You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Science & Technology
CMV-22B Osprey "Not Operationally Suitable" According To Test Report
2024-02-07
Nothing is too good for our troops, and that is what they get.
[WARZONE] Even before the entire fleet of V-22 tilt-rotor aircraft was grounded following a fatal crash of an Air Force Osprey off the coast of Japan in November, the Navy’s version was experiencing serious issues that limited its ability to fully perform its assigned missions. Those findings by the Pentagon’s top testing office come even though the Navy's former air boss called the CMV-22B a "game changer" after its first operational deployment in 2022. The Osprey grounding has also forced the Navy to resort to using its dwindling fleet of C-2A Greyhounds to perform essential Carrier Onboard Delivery (COD) duties.

Problems with the ice protection system are a significant concern for the CMV-22B, but there have been several potential drawbacks with having the aircraft take over the COD role since the program's inception. Those issues include a lack of cabin pressurization. Unless its passengers and crew are on oxygen, the Osprey has to fly at lower altitudes, through poorer weather, and over long distances, at turboprop-like speeds. Being that its destination can be far out to sea with no nearby divert field, that can include being forced to fly through highly inclement weather. There are other key advantages to having the CMV-22B on the COD mission, which we will discuss in a moment.

The 44% of mission failures due to problems with the ice protection system appears to be a significant increase from what was previously known.

As we noted in the past, in February 2023, as the Navy announced the CMV-22B had obtained its Initial Operating Capability (IOC), Bloomberg News reported that the aircraft wasn’t yet "operationally suitable." That was because it had only "partially met reliability requirements," the Pentagon’s testing office said in a non-public assessment. Among the problems was that the CMV-22's ice protection system "accounted for 25% of the operational mission failures, which will result in mission aborts."

"The CMV-22B was not operationally suitable due to failures of many subsystems, with the ice protection system accounting for 44% of the total operational mission failures," the Pentagon's Office of the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation, or DOT&E, stated in its Fiscal Year 2023 annual report released last week.
Posted by:Besoeker

#12  so the answer is no darth
Posted by: Chris   2024-02-07 12:45  

#11  Alternatively, it has the advertised range, speed and capacity for OPTEMPO surgical strikes.
Posted by: Skidmark   2024-02-07 11:14  

#10  Guess I never realized the cabin is not pressurized.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2024-02-07 09:55  

#9  having two big rotating engines at the wing tip scares me.
Posted by: irish rage boy   2024-02-07 09:25  

#8  Has it ever been operationally suitable?

Not for the long (20+ year) term. It was a developmental technology that hadn't worked out all the kinks yet. They have gotten a lot better with new designs based off lessons learned, but the Osprey is reaching the end of its lifespan.
Posted by: DarthVader   2024-02-07 09:16  

#7  "Boeing. We can make it work most of the time."
Posted by: ed in texas   2024-02-07 09:09  

#6  /\ Unless there was sex involved, that really is the only thing left Merc.
Posted by: Besoeker   2024-02-07 08:46  

#5  It probably suited the bank accounts of everyone who lobbied for it or accepted a bribe quite well.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2024-02-07 08:37  

#4  Has it ever been operationally suitable?
Posted by: Chris   2024-02-07 08:22  

#3  Another Boeing foul-up.
Posted by: Huputle Cherelet4131   2024-02-07 06:58  

#2  ...I'm wondering if they ever solved the issue of F-35 engines not fitting in the CMV.

Mike
Posted by: MikeKozlowski   2024-02-07 06:37  

#1  It is a clever idea. There are just some problems with making it work in a way that won't kill you.
tl;dr: It is a helicopter, but with more moving parts.
Posted by: SteveS   2024-02-07 00:24  

00:00