You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia
Ukraine was asked to capitulate
2024-03-15
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited.
by Victoria Nikiforova

[RIA] Our Western opponents are stretched out in a paradoxical split. On the one hand, they are pushing the Ukrainians to fight with us, providing them with money, weapons and even NATO troops posing as Chevek soldiers and mercenaries. On the other hand, they demand that Russia enter into peace negotiations.

And okay, we would lose. But the Russian army is moving forward every day, Kiev openly admits that it has no one to fight with. The remaining VSEushniks have the alternative of either dying at the front or surrendering. It’s no wonder that they increasingly choose the latter.

The best evidence of panic in the ranks of the enemy is the split in the ranks of NATO: half of the alliance, led by France, Britain and Poland, dreams of intervention in Ukraine, the other half is pulling them away from this disastrous enterprise. Victories always unite, only the prospect of imminent defeat can split allies so much.
\
That is, everything is fine in Russia - both at the front and in the rear. Economic growth is evident - thanks to the sanctions. Political stability - God grant to everyone, the people are united and are not at all inclined to "Maidan". In this format, you can fight not only for years, but for decades, which is quite in the traditions of our great empire: we conquered the Caucasus for almost half a century, the British and French grumbled, of course, but did not interfere.

So why do we need peace talks at all? Unless to save from final destruction an alternatively gifted nation, which for some reason decided in a single impulse to commit suicide against the Russian army.

Ukrainians, of course, are not strangers to us, but this humanitarian mission is possible only after the final capitulation of the Kyiv regime.

Deputy Chairman of the National Security Council Dmitry Medvedev has just made a similar humanitarian proposal. In his telegram channel, he wrote his own formula for peace, an alternative to the one Hetman Zelensky is running around with.

Medvedev's proposals are distinguished by true humanism. If his formula is adopted, many Ukrainians will save their lives, peaceful construction will begin in the war-ravaged territories, the economy will begin to flourish, refugees will return home and in general everything will be fine.

Naturally, the first point of Medvedev’s peace formula is the demand for the complete and unconditional surrender of Ukraine. This simply reflects the situation at the front: the former Ukrainian SSR has already lost more than 20 percent of its territories, the loss of the rest is a matter of time. Timely surrender will save a large number of human lives.

After this, the “former Ukraine,” as Medvedev calls it, should be demilitarized with a complete ban on the creation of any paramilitary forces.

The second point requires the forced denazification of the Kyiv regime and all authorities of the “former Ukraine”.

Next, the UN must recognize the loss of international subjectivity by the “former Ukraine”. The territory cannot enter into any military alliances without Russia's consent.

After this, all constitutional bodies of the “former Ukraine” resign and elections to a provisional parliament are held. The first decision of parliament is to pay large-scale reparations to Russia; all citizens of our country whose relatives were injured or died during the SVO should receive compensation.

Then the provisional parliament officially recognizes the entire territory of the “former Ukraine” as the territory of the Russian Federation - and dissolves itself. The UN approves the act of reunification of the “former Ukraine” and Russia. A curtain.

There are only seven points in Medvedev’s peace formula; it is clear, logical and stems from the real state of affairs, as they say, “on earth.” Yes, two years ago Moscow agreed to much more lenient conditions, which was recorded in Istanbul. However, times have changed, the train has left, the front line is moving closer and closer to Kyiv. Probably, it was necessary to fight “better”.

So, the cards are laid out on the table. Before us - and before the world community - are two formulas for peace. Zelensky’s proposal is that Russia should give up Crimea, DPR, LPR and restore the territorial integrity of Ukraine within the 1991 borders. We also have to withdraw our troops, pay a lot and repent often.

President Putin called Zelensky’s formula “wants after the use of psychotropic drugs.” There is no doubt that Dmitry Medvedev's initiative will cause indignation in the former Ukrainian SSR. It would seem that the approaches of Moscow and Kyiv are diametrically opposed. As they say, we have resolved all the issues, except for the land issue - who will bury whom.

However, one point in these formulas of peace - and the most important one - coincides almost literally. Zelensky wants a Ukraine within the borders of 1991. Medvedev demands the complete reunification of Ukraine and Russia. But for almost the entire 1991, right up to December, the RSFSR and the Ukrainian SSR were parts of one country called the USSR.

So no contradictions. We give Zelensky what he wants and take Ukraine for ourselves.

Posted by:badanov

#1  Ukraine is being 'outgunned' against Russia, Nato chief Jens Stoltenberg warns as he calls for members to increase their support for the embattled country
Posted by: Skidmark   2024-03-15 08:47  

00:00