You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Submit your comments on this article
-Signs, Portents, and the Weather-
Now scientists say wearing JEANS is bad for the environment: Study reveals wearing a pair just once is the equivalent to driving a car for 6.4 miles
2024-04-06
[Daily Mail, where America gets its news] Worth it!
  • Researchers say that jeans sold in fast fashion produce 2.5kg of CO2 per wear

  • Buying second-hand or recycling old clothes can cut emissions by 90 per cent
    Sure, but buying used means the items won’t last as long, then will need to be replaced. It’s a wash.
Posted by:Skidmark

#15  GongDong U is Chinese! Nuff Said
Posted by: Old Salty   2024-04-06 15:16  

#14  Holy Crap, what a superb video depiction of environmental impact!
Posted by: NoMoreBS   2024-04-06 13:44  

#13  I'm guessing these so-called scientists wear polyester.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2024-04-06 13:02  

#12  "Equivalent to two minutes of Kamala's mouth being open with nothing in it..."
Posted by: M. Murcek   2024-04-06 10:17  

#11  I just finished a study that says scientists are bad for the environment and the equivalent of driving a car 60 miles a day.

Recommend immediate execution of all those scientists.
Posted by: DarthVader   2024-04-06 10:16  

#10  -Spared is EW's link to Lizzo's 'Juice'-
Posted by: swksvolFF   2024-04-06 10:06  

#9  First, its Daily Mail, which is as retarded as a Panda on a heavy metals diet.

Well thats it really. No need to keep reading after the first Covid article.

So jeans, or any product, certain energy goes into getting those pants on you. Each wear then makes the energy per product less. 10 energy, 5 wears, 2 energy per wear. 10 energy, 20 wears, 0.5 energy per wear.

So what we are looking for here is durability, something The West used to do before getting hooked on chinesium and The Beatles.

I am sure though, Daily Mail will retort that a dashiki is good for the environment.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2024-04-06 10:03  

#8  On the other hand, this scientist has determined yoga pants are good for the environment.
Posted by: Ebbuger Whuque4103   2024-04-06 09:29  

#7  

Average people say listening to QUACK Scientists
playing the $$$$ game is deadly.
Posted by: NN2N1   2024-04-06 08:28  

#6  "Life'll kill ya."

- Warren Zevon
Posted by: M. Murcek   2024-04-06 08:06  

#5  'Fast Fashion' jeans worn just seven times versus 'traditional' jeans are worn 120 times.

Fast fashion is a business model that focuses on the production of garments in bulk, and as quickly as possible, in response to current trends, according to Dr. Preeti Arya CNN

Study debunked!
Posted by: Bobby   2024-04-06 07:52  

#4  

These people are bloody nuts. On the up side jeans might help produce plant food gas.
Posted by: Woodrow   2024-04-06 07:38  

#3  My jeans are all about 10 years old, so they're recycled every time I wear them.

Not sure about the CO2 part, maybe CH4?
Posted by: Mullah Richard OTR   2024-04-06 06:52  

#2  How does that compare with other pants? Maybe grass skirts are the answer? Or fig leaves...?
Posted by: Glenmore   2024-04-06 00:20  

#1  "Scientists"
Posted by: Grom the Reflective   2024-04-06 00:10  

00:00