You have commented 0 times on Rantburg.

We're sorry, but only human beings are allowed to comment on Rantburg. If you're a human being, please take this simple test to prove it. If you're not, get lost.

Sock Puppet, though not of Doom
A rose, possibly the Rose of San Antone but not the Yellow Rose of Texas
Scizophrenic mouse
Teapot
Munchkins
Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Photo
-Lurid Crime Tales-
Lois Lerner's Blackberry deliberately destroyed after start of congressional probe
2014-08-27
[FOXNEWS] Lois Lerner
...the former head of the IRS Exempt Unit. She is a past president of the Council on Governmental Ethics Laws and a member of the Massachussetts bar. She was held in contempt of Congress for her role in the IRS targeting of regime political enemies and refusing to testify. The dog ate her computer's hard drive with all her emails on it...
’s Blackberry was intentionally destroyed after Congress had begun its probe into IRS targeting of conservative groups, a senior IRS lawyer acknowledged in a sworn declaration.

Thomas Kane, Deputy Assistant Chief Counsel for the IRS, wrote in the declaration, part of a lawsuit filed by Judicial Watch against the IRS, that the Blackberry was "removed or wiped clean of any sensitive or proprietary information and removed as scrap for disposal in June 2012."

That date - June 2012 - is significant because by that time, ex-IRS official Lerner had already been summoned before congressional staffers who interviewed her about reports of the IRS' targeting of conservative groups.

"We had already talked to her. Our personal staff and Oversight Committee staff had sat down with Ms. Lerner and confronted her about information we were getting from conservative groups in the state of Ohio and around the country," Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, told Fox News.

"If you intentionally destroy evidence, that is a crime. If you make a statement in court saying the evidence is not available and it is, that is also a crime," said Jay Sekulow, Chief Counsel for the American Center for Law and Justice.

The IRS did not immediately respond to Fox News’ request for comment.

News of the Blackberry's destruction followed Monday’s statement by Judicial Watch that Justice Department attorneys said in a Friday phone call the federal government backs up all computer records to ensure continuity of government in event of a catastrophe, but retrieving the Lerner emails would simply be "too onerous."

An administration official told Fox News Monday night that Judicial Watch misinterpreted the Friday phone call. "There was no new back-up system described last week to Judicial Watch," he said. "Government lawyers who spoke to Judicial Watch simply referred to the same email retention policy that Commissioner (John) Koskinen had described in his Congressional testimony."
Posted by:Fred

#10  she committed crimes, and during her work. I would support stripping her pension at a minimum for all of the duration she was doing this shit for the IRS. That would cause other bureauturds to reconsider. Given her sour attitude, games, and partisanship - fry her
Posted by: Frank G   2014-08-27 22:35  

#9  I am not a lawyer, but whatever Lerner did is not treason according to the Constitution.

It sure seems to be criminal, though. She should be trying out an orange jumpsuit.
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia   2014-08-27 22:05  

#8  When you get down to it, this kind of crap is treason and should be considered as such. With the full punishment applied.
Posted by: Silentbrick   2014-08-27 21:34  

#7  In a world where karma was balanced she would have been required to EAT the blackberry.
Posted by: 3dc   2014-08-27 20:36  

#6  It seems to me that Ford was just letting those in the justice system know it would be a waste of time to go after Nixon under his (and any further) administrations.
Posted by: gorb   2014-08-27 13:30  

#5  Didn't Ford pardon Nixon without Nixon having been convicted?
Posted by: Glenmore   2014-08-27 10:45  

#4  Achilles' heel in Champ's strategy: you can't pardon someone who hasn't been convicted. Now if only the Republicans could grow a spine.
Posted by: AzCat   2014-08-27 09:07  

#3  If the regime fall expect one of the last acts will be pardons issued, probably as thick as the District's phonebook.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2014-08-27 08:32  

#2  Forget the DoJ, it's hopeless under the current regime. This matter must somehow make it's way into the Supreme Court where hopefully justice and sanity may somehow prevail.
Posted by: Besoeker   2014-08-27 03:31  

#1  Willfully destroying evidence---that's a felony or something, right?
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2014-08-27 01:00