Submit your comments on this article |
Terror Networks |
Obama's Iraq-Syria Dilemma: No Force Now on Ground Can Beat ISIS |
2014-08-27 |
If Washington is counting on the Kurds to defeat the terrorist caliphate with a little support from American drones and warplanes, it had better think again. |
Posted by:Pappy |
#4 Somethings gotta give - iff somebody's feelings get hurt, so bit it ala the "fog/chaos of war". Its either the above, or the following ... * WORLD NEWS > [Fox News] AL-QAEDA MAGAZINE [AQAP-published spinoff "Palestine"] HINTS AT LOOMING [US] ATTACKS, URGES BOMBING OF LAS VEGAS, MILITARY [+ Military-industrial] TARGETS. As per various Twitter msgs, the ISIS claims they are present in LA, Chicago, + Washington DC, AKA "OBAMA/DEMOCRAT-LAND". * TOPIX > [Daily Mail] AUSTRALIAN DEFENCE CHIEF WARNS BRUTAL ISIS WILL HAVE TO BE DEFEATED WID TROOPS ON THE BATTLEFIELD. > ISIS "Not Defeatable" wid Airpower alone. > "Situation is bigger than Iraq". |
Posted by: JosephMendiola 2014-08-27 22:58 |
#3 the dilemma is to the Obama narrative many of the best places, in a military sense, to bomb ISIS are in Syria but if the US hits ISIS there, the US will effectively be on the same side as Hezbollah and Assad |
Posted by: lord garth 2014-08-27 15:37 |
#2 Obama's Dilemma: they haven't taught it at Harvard. |
Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2014-08-27 12:29 |
#1 Why would the worlds dominant air power restrict its thinkingvto ground forces. We just need baitvto lure isis into open territory and will to bomb the crap out of them. |
Posted by: rjschwarz 2014-08-27 10:13 |