You have commented 0 times on Rantburg.

We're sorry, but only human beings are allowed to comment on Rantburg. If you're a human being, please take this simple test to prove it. If you're not, get lost.

Caveman
Some wine is red, some wine is white. Some people drink wine most every night
Santa Claus groping a comely young maiden
A rose, possibly the Rose of San Antone but not the Yellow Rose of Texas
Teapot
Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Photo
Home Front: Politix
Barack Obama Convinced He Is The Chosen One To "Save The Planet."
2015-09-01
[DCWhispers]. With the time ticking on the final years of his presidency, Barack Obama is said to be moving aggressively toward sweeping Executive Authority measures enacted out of a sincere belief by the president that he was chosen to save the planet from the ravages of human progress.

This week he flies to Alaska to renew his quest to declare climate change the greatest threat to humankind and position himself as the only American president to date to address the issue with the seriousness Barack Obama believes it deserves.

"He is more convinced than ever that he is the one to make it happen regarding new climate change laws. He doesn't want to hear anything about it being politically tough or other versions of science that disagree with what he's doing. It's all-in for the president and he intends to diminish our carbon-based economy as much as possible before he leaves office. He's daring anyone to challenge him on this. This is another legacy moment, like the Iran deal, Cuba, etc. He is determined to see himself go down as one of the greatest presidents in U.S. history and nothing or no-one is going to prevent that from happening. It's also a big part of his post-White House plans. He wants to position himself as the international leader on the subject, something that will go beyond the laws of the United States. He favors the concept of a global authority -- big time."

This week President Obama travels to Alaska to announce his intent to further expand efforts by the Environmental Protection Agency to reduce America's carbon emissions. The president will stage a number of "victim forums" showcasing Alaskans negatively impacted by climate change. These events will be the backdrop for the president's demand for an international climate change treaty. The Alaskan trip bookends the president's most recent remarks commemorating the 10th anniversary of Hurricane Katrina in which he again referenced climate change. (Despite the actual science indicating climate change, be it real or imagined, had nothing to do with the hurricane or the local and state government incompetence that was actually to blame for much of the resulting loss of life.)

Readers would do well to recall it was Barack Obama who, during his 20o8 election night speech said HIS victory would be remembered for the following:

"...this was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal."

It appears the president is intent on seeing that astonishing claim become reality -- at least in his own mind.
Posted by:Blossom Unains5562

#8  Also, the ocean eats more than 80% of Carbon Dioxide as it is. They are using their political positions to run a scam like they always do - trying to prove a negative.

So what if there is climate change?

So what?
Move.
Posted by: newc   2015-09-01 23:09  

#7  For those who live in Alaska, global warming (or whatever you want to call it) is a fact of life. You can see the glaciers and permafrost melting right before your eyes. But the real story about a glacier is not that it is melting, but where it has been.

The Portage Glacier is located about 50 miles southwest of Anchorage, Alaska. If you climb up to the top of the glacier it becomes obvious that it's southern face once extended at least 200 miles farther south out into what today is the Cook Inlet.
In 1778 Captain James Cook sailed the entire length of the Cook Inlet while searching for the Northwest Passage.
Since the Cook Expedition explored the entire inlet by boat, not snow machine, it is also obvious that the ice covering the Inlet (the Portage Glacier) had began melting long before the year Captain Cook arrived in 1778.

It probably began melting at the end of the little ice age.

If you want to stop the glaciers from melting one question that needs to be answered is: What was the global temperature before the glacier began to melt ?
Was it 5, 10, 20, or even 50 degrees colder than it is today ?

Whatever the answer it would be catastrophic, not only for Alaska, but for all northern regions of the world to lower global temperatures by that degree.

The whole honest truth is that the glaciers have been melting for much longer than there have been human beings living in North America.

The most "inconvenient truth" of all is that any reduction of global temperatures, low enough to stop the glaciers from melting, would drive most living species of the northern regions of the world into extinction.

Global temperatures warm enough to melt the glaciers have been to the great benefit of mankind ever since human beings first appeared on Earth. The loss of those benefits only to save a few packs of ice, or a few hectares of coastline, is pure foolishness.

And those who advocate for lower global temperatures are the most foolish of all.
Posted by: junkiron   2015-09-01 18:03  

#6  This little dipshit could not save a coffee shop.
Posted by: newc   2015-09-01 12:25  

#5  Barack Obama is said to be moving aggressively toward sweeping Executive Authority measures enacted out of a sincere belief by the president that he was chosen to save the planet from the ravages of human progress.

ravages of human progress progresssives FIFY Chosen One.
Posted by: JohnQC   2015-09-01 10:58  

#4  What happens when Jim Jones goes to the Whitehouse? Next he will be spouting nonsense about being the 12th Imam.
Posted by: JohnQC   2015-09-01 10:12  

#3  Messianic Complex.
Posted by: JohnQC   2015-09-01 10:10  

#2  The question here is "To save the planet for whom?".
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2015-09-01 09:35  

#1  I kind of liked my weather this summer. NE Texas is still nice and green after a (too) wet spring. Only a few days over 100 degrees.
SE Louisiana hasn't been bad either, though hurricane potential remains a risk.
All in all, I think the change I'VE had this year is just fine.
Posted by: Glenmore   2015-09-01 08:28