You have commented 0 times on Rantburg.

We're sorry, but only human beings are allowed to comment on Rantburg. If you're a human being, please take this simple test to prove it. If you're not, get lost.

Recruiting poster for the WACs
Fluffy bunnies
Munchkins
Al Capp's Moonbeam McSwine
Swine in love
Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Photo
Economy
Lifting Champ's Oil Export ban will Create 300k Jobs And $38 Billion
2015-11-30
[Daily Caller] Lifting the oil export ban will create hundreds of thousands of new jobs and billions of dollars according a Friday article by Heritage Foundation economist Nicolas Loris.

"Lifting the ban would generate more jobs for Americans, supply the United States and the world with more affordable energy and provide important geopolitical benefits for Washington and its allies. Unfortunately, some politicians want to hold this common-sense measure hostage until they get funding for their pet projects." Loris says, and concludes that "[t]he decision to export crude oil should be decided by those who produce and sell the oil, not by Washington bureaucrats."

Presently, selling American crude oil to other countries is illegal, despite the best efforts of House Republicans who voted to lift the ban in October. The Senate is preparing to act to lift the ban, but President Barack Obama has threatened to veto any attempt to do so.

Exporting oil will boost U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) by $38 billion, reduce the trade deficit by $22 billion and add 300,000 new jobs by 2020, according to studies cited by Loris.
Posted by:Besoeker

#8  BRB gotta install El Capitan. Ugh.
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain   2015-11-30 20:59  

#7  Ship: the EIA says that refined products exports mean the net imports are lower, and it's only about 27 %, but that's for 2014. I think it'll be lower this year.
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain   2015-11-30 20:59  

#6  Snowy how much of the imported is for domestic use as opposed to ruining thru a refinery and exporting it? Still freaks me out that the U.S. Is the largest exporter of fuel in the world (don't know if that is net or gross).
Posted by: Shipman   2015-11-30 16:34  

#5  more exports would tend to support the argument for more of those anti-enviro friendly pipelines or more of those really icky exploding trains that just won 3 more years to install PTC....
how would this play to bammie's eco-legacy?
Posted by: USN, Ret.   2015-11-30 15:09  

#4  The last time I checked the numbers the US is importing somewhere between 44 and 48% of the oil used here.
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain   2015-11-30 12:40  

#3  P2k, 1973 was bathed in the Cold War and the Middle East's proxy standing.

Sorta something like what's going on now.


Oh, don't forget the Graft Potential.
Posted by: AlanC   2015-11-30 11:54  

#2  Champ's export ban? Here I thought that was something that popped up well before the man was even around. IIRC that the deal for the Alaskan oil pipeline banned export of that crude. Then the '73 oil crisis did it's thing to the process.

If there's anything at is subject to vagaries of the market, oil certainly is one. I'm sure the quick buck artists are desperate to dump on the international market at our long term expense.

Right now we're sitting on a self sufficiency as the world is going mad. Better to look long term for our security.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2015-11-30 08:56  

#1  Must be a tough call for Champ. Selling off our oil means we have less and helps keep the price down for poor undeveloped countries - like Kenya. On the other hand, it keeps the price low, which is bad for his oil-producing buddies. But it would reduce unemployment. But that reduces government dependence, which is a good thing.

Good thing he has ValJar to point him in the right direction - this is sooooo confusing!
Posted by: Bobby   2015-11-30 07:57