You have commented 0 times on Rantburg.

We're sorry, but only human beings are allowed to comment on Rantburg. If you're a human being, please take this simple test to prove it. If you're not, get lost.

Al Capp's Moonbeam McSwine
Fluffy bunnies
Drunken hussy in a shopping cart
Munchkins
Why is this man laughing?
Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Photo
Government
CIA director: '28 pages' contain inaccurate information
2016-05-02
[The Hill] CIA Director John Brennan said Sunday that releasing the 28 classified pages from the 9/11 Commission report would be a mistake because they contain inaccurate, un-vetted information that could be used to tie Saudi Arabia to the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks.

"This chapter was kept out because of concerns about sensitive methods, investigative actions, and the investigation of 9/11 was still underway in 2002," Brennan said on NBC's "Meet the Press."

He said information in the 28 pages hasn't been vetted or corroborated, adding that releasing the information would give ammunition to those who want to tie the terror attacks to Saudi Arabia.
Kinetic analogy, most interesting. By 'ammunition' he's actually referring to confirmation. If there was nothing 'there there,' releasing the documents would provide the proof. Amiwrong ?
"I think there's a combination of things that are accurate and inaccurate [in the report]," Brennan said. "I think the 9/11 Commission took that joint inquiry and those 28 pages or so and followed through on the investigation and then came out with a very clear judgment that there was no evidence that ... Saudi government as an institution or Saudi officials or individuals had provided financial support to al Qaeda."

Former and current congressmen argue the pages show the existence of a Saudi support network for the hijackers involved in the terror attacks. The 28 pages were cut from a report on the 9/11 terror attacks in 2003 by the George W. Bush administration in the interest of national security.

Those critics say the vague wording in the report left open the possibility that less senior officials or other parts of the Saudi government could have played a role.

Former Sen. Bob Graham (D-Fla.), who helped author the report, says he believes it shows the 9/11 hijackers were "substantially" supported by the Saudi government, as well as charities and wealthy people in that country.

"I think it is implausible to believe that 19 people, most of whom didn't speak English, most of whom had never been in the United States before, many of whom didn't have a high school education -- could've carried out such a complicated task without some support from within the United States," Graham said in an interview with "60 Minutes" in April.

Meanwhile, House and Senate lawmakers are backing a bill that would let families of terror victims sue foreign states that helped fund or support terrorist attacks in the U.S.

In response to that legislation, which President Obama has lobbied against, the Saudi government threatened to sell off hundreds of billions of dollars' worth of American assets.
Posted by:Besoeker

#19  Here is the actual report.

Thank you, Besoeker. Downloaded for later perusal.
Posted by: trailing wife   2016-05-02 21:39  

#18  Didn't Nixon's press secretary notoriously say something to the effect that "these statements are no longer operative."? that about sums up the article IMO. Feel free to correct If I have the citation's words incorrect. They were and remain a marvel of Orwellian doublespeak.
Posted by: borgboy   2016-05-02 19:56  

#17  And so the spin begins...

What's next? It was a Swiss plot?
Posted by: Bill Clinton   2016-05-02 19:56  

#16  This is 'dream time', it just seems like the real world.
Posted by: Skidmark   2016-05-02 19:07  

#15  Hey skid, sometimes I just can't help myself and crawl from my safe space into the real world.
Posted by: 49 pan   2016-05-02 17:04  

#14  Thanks for the .pdf B.
Hey there Pan.
Posted by: Skidmark   2016-05-02 16:44  

#13  The imams are controlling this and the government can not go against them. The soddies are hostage to the Islamic leaders. This is well known and a great example of why there needs to be a deprecation of church and state. Yes soddies are running most of the AQ operations and Iran is running the rest. But in reality their religious leaders are running it and the Kings would never dare to go against them.
Posted by: 49 pan   2016-05-02 14:55  

#12  Here is the actual report. The money trail begins to be addressed at page 169.
Posted by: Besoeker   2016-05-02 14:52  

#11  Whereas the rest xyz pages are OK?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2016-05-02 14:25  

#10  Of course the Saudis wittingly allowed the OBL monster to grow...and now they encourage the ISIS brand. First glance - Brennan knowingly attempts to deceive by stating that no Saudi "individual" provided financial support to AQ...stupid. This deception provides evidence that Brennan is a liar and causes us to look a little deeper. Now we are troubled by his carefully qualified statement we lack evidence that the Saudi government, any official nor individual provided financial support. One - OBL was an Saudi and funded the planes operation...with help from his freinds. Two - he qualified "financial support" - what other types of support do we have evidence of that the Saudis provided? Fast forward to today - are the Saudis supporting ISIS? There is a noted lack of ISIS trouble in the Sunni kingdom and now the Saudis threaten us to keep our distance... What does the CIA know?
Posted by: Spike Spigum1824   2016-05-02 12:12  

#9  The unemployment numbers, GDP estimates... are inaccurate yet the GIVERnment publishes them routinely.
Posted by: Airandee   2016-05-02 12:00  

#8  How is it the X-files didn't use the 28 pages to insinuate aliens were involved? The story lines write themselves and they'd probably have gotten CIA assistance.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2016-05-02 11:28  

#7  they contain inaccurate, un-vetted information

So why did we have a Commission then if it can't do its job?
Posted by: gorb   2016-05-02 11:11  

#6  Brennan assumes a glassy-eyed stare: "The al-Sauds are the kindest, bravest, warmest, most wonderful human beings I've ever known in my life."
Posted by: regular joe   2016-05-02 09:48  

#5  Verboden Toegang (no admittance). Please visit the lav.
Posted by: Besoeker   2016-05-02 08:34  

#4  Inaccurate information is not the same as classified. The government should not be able to hide things just because they cocked them up.

Most Transparent Administration Ever?

Well it is pretty "transparent" what they are up to with this. Ass covering.
Posted by: Pearl Ulereter9892   2016-05-02 07:59  

#3  Wasn't Brennan a recent convert to Islam?

Even if he isn't, it is well known he has significant ties to SA.
Posted by: jvalentour   2016-05-02 06:43  

#2  TRANSLATION: "Oh, yeah. The al-Sauds were in it up to their necks, but even at this late date people might get all revenge-y, so we are gonna sit on this hard."

Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2016-05-02 05:19  

#1  "This chapter was kept out because of concerns about sensitive methods, investigative actions, and the investigation of 9/11 was still underway in 2002," Brennan said on NBC's "Meet the Press." He said information in the 28 pages hasn't been vetted or corroborated,

Alright then, after 15 years of careful 'vetting and corroboration,' where is your corrected intelligence update ?

Clumsy attempt at discrediting Director Brennan, very clumsy.
Posted by: Besoeker   2016-05-02 04:29