Hi there, !
Today Mon 10/13/2008 Sun 10/12/2008 Sat 10/11/2008 Fri 10/10/2008 Thu 10/09/2008 Wed 10/08/2008 Tue 10/07/2008 Archives
Rantburg
533231 articles and 1860471 comments are archived on Rantburg.

Today: 79 articles and 291 comments as of 8:04.
Post a news link    Post your own article   
Area: WoT Operations    WoT Background    Non-WoT    Local News       
15 dead in suicide blast at Pakistan tribal meeting
Today's Headlines
Headline Comments [Views]
Page 4: Opinion
0 [2] 
1 00:00 swksvolFF [3] 
12 00:00 Frank G [2] 
1 00:00 Procopius2k [1] 
4 00:00 JosephMendiola [] 
5 00:00 CrazyFool [] 
23 00:00 Jolutch Mussolini7800 [4] 
4 00:00 Anguper Hupomosing9418 [] 
9 00:00 Pappy [1] 
Page 1: WoT Operations
4 00:00 Frank G [2]
9 00:00 logi_cal [5]
1 00:00 Red Dawg [13]
9 00:00 Old Patriot [3]
6 00:00 Tiny Javique2919 [3]
5 00:00 .5MT [1]
1 00:00 chris [7]
0 [8]
1 00:00 Frank G [8]
2 00:00 Mitch H. [4]
0 [4]
0 [5]
4 00:00 Abu do you love [6]
4 00:00 Ebbeatch Brown9704 [4]
0 [3]
0 [3]
3 00:00 g(r)omgoru [1]
2 00:00 Old Patriot [4]
0 [6]
0 []
0 [1]
0 [8]
2 00:00 Redneck Jim [3]
Page 2: WoT Background
5 00:00 Jolutch Mussolini7800 [3]
1 00:00 chris [3]
10 00:00 Old Patriot [2]
0 [5]
2 00:00 chris [1]
3 00:00 lotp [2]
1 00:00 chris [1]
4 00:00 chris [4]
2 00:00 .5MT [4]
1 00:00 JFM [5]
0 [6]
0 [2]
0 [1]
5 00:00 DarthVader [3]
3 00:00 lotp [2]
7 00:00 Querent []
0 []
1 00:00 Frank G [1]
12 00:00 JosephMendiola [9]
Page 3: Non-WoT
0 [1]
3 00:00 Tyranysaurus Elmererong1948 [1]
5 00:00 Frank G [1]
12 00:00 CrazyFool [3]
3 00:00 OregonGuy [2]
4 00:00 Anguper Hupomosing9418 [2]
3 00:00 trailing wife []
2 00:00 regular joe [2]
28 00:00 Angie Schultz [2]
0 []
9 00:00 newc [4]
3 00:00 .5MT [1]
5 00:00 swksvolFF []
0 []
3 00:00 swksvolFF []
4 00:00 Anguper Hupomosing9418 [1]
1 00:00 mojo [1]
0 []
0 [1]
Page 5: Russia-Former Soviet Union
1 00:00 Jolutch Mussolini7800 [6]
1 00:00 Mike Kozlowski [2]
1 00:00 Iblis [3]
5 00:00 AlmostAnonymous5839 []
7 00:00 Jolutch Mussolini7800 [2]
2 00:00 Ulusoling Hatfield4645 []
2 00:00 bigjim-ky []
16 00:00 Frank G [2]
1 00:00 Glenmore []
Britain
Welcome to Saudi Britain
Posted by: tipper || 10/10/2008 12:20 || Comments || Link || [3 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Pat Condell is a gem.
Posted by: swksvolFF || 10/10/2008 12:27 Comments || Top||


Down Under
Alcohol creates 'barrier' for Muslims
Posted by: Oztralian || 10/10/2008 10:51 || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:

#1  So does pork...
And uncovered women...
And Christians...
And Jews...
And technology...
And Free thought and ideas...
Posted by: DarthVader || 10/10/2008 11:12 Comments || Top||

#2  Alcohol, food and gender relations are the key barriers to social interaction between Muslim and non-Muslim Australians, a study suggests.
Posted by: European Conservative || 10/10/2008 11:18 Comments || Top||

#3  Well thats ok, I don't think I would have got along with Carrie Nation either.

Little story, went and visited a friend in Virginia who had just got back from Iraq; I had to spend the night in Atlanta due to storms. That morning we went to play golf and heck yeah we had some beers. Paired with a couple of mohommatons to make a four-some. They were nice at first but then started avoiding us, not even chit chat during the tee box. Now I'm not so sure what was bothering them more, that we were drinking in front of them or that we were so much better than them at golf while we were drinking.
Posted by: swksvolFF || 10/10/2008 11:19 Comments || Top||

#4  Ever been in Saudi Arabia and checked what they REALLY have in their tea cups?

Oh boy
Posted by: European Conservative || 10/10/2008 11:23 Comments || Top||

#5  alcohol was around before Islam
Posted by: chris || 10/10/2008 12:17 Comments || Top||

#6  Is is perfume or lysol?
Posted by: swksvolFF || 10/10/2008 12:26 Comments || Top||

#7  Let's cut to the chase here. ISLAM creates 'barrier' for Muslims.
Posted by: Parabellum || 10/10/2008 13:00 Comments || Top||

#8  It seems many Arabs have problems with self-control. Booze tends to release inhabitions. It seems Mohammad might have known his audience.

Of course if one is always using training wheels on a safe flat track they won't be prepared for the tour de France race that is the real world. Entire nations might just come in last place.
Posted by: rjschwarz || 10/10/2008 13:52 Comments || Top||

#9  I keep saying.

Cross + Garlic for vampires.

Silver for werewolves.

Alcohol + Pork for Muslims.

If you don't want to be pestered by Muslims, you have to carry liquor and pork around.
Posted by: Anonymoose || 10/10/2008 14:03 Comments || Top||

#10  I carry it on my breath most everywhere I go.
Works like a charm, I've not had a muslim talk to me in years. At least nobody that LOOKS muslim.
Its like AIDS, you can't always tell by looking at them.
/bourbon breath
Posted by: bigjim-ky || 10/10/2008 14:30 Comments || Top||

#11  Try as I might, I just can't get used to bacon schnapps. I guess it'll just have to be Wild Turkey and prociutto...
Posted by: M. Murcek || 10/10/2008 20:41 Comments || Top||

#12  beer and a slimjim should do on the '09 personal budget
Posted by: Frank G || 10/10/2008 21:03 Comments || Top||


Home Front: Politix
More about the ancient days of 1995
Posted by: tipper || 10/10/2008 15:29 || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:


The Futility of Class Warfare
Posted by: tipper || 10/10/2008 09:47 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Yep, Gov. Palin had all those special doors opened for her because of her class. So, why all the viscous 'trailer trash' attacks upon a proletarian by the Donks, Champions of the Working Class(tm)? Other than the upper echelons of the Donks seem to contain a rather large contingent of the coastie limousine socialist crowd and dilettantes.
Posted by: Procopius2k || 10/10/2008 10:55 Comments || Top||


ACORN Files Voting Rights Suit on Behalf of Imaginary-Americans
Only Iowahawk can come up with something like this. Read the entire thing at the link.
ST. LOUIS - Attorneys for the voting registration organizations ACORN and Project Vote filed an anti-discrimination voting rights suit in the U.S. Federal District court this morning, alleging the United States government is involved in "a widespread, systematic effort to disenfranchise Imaginary-Americans and deprive them of access to polls."

"Participation in our electoral process is a fundamental right, and the foundation of our democracy," said ASDF ASDFG, a spokesperson for the National Association for the Advancement of Imaginary People, one of the groups named as plaintiffs in the class action. "We will not be silent when government denies people access to the polls on the basis of color, or sex, or existential status."

The new suit was prompted by on a series of law enforcement raids of ACORN offices in 10 states over the past week, as well as a reported Justice Department investigation. Federal and state officials say they were acting on tips of fraudulent voter registration forms, after election officials reported a flood of unusual applications submitted by ACORN canvassers. In Las Vegas the Clarke County election commission reported thousands of registrations signed by the Dallas Cowboys, while in St. Louis officials discovered thousands of others signed by Power Rangers, Menudo, and Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles. In Cleveland, Ohio Republican officials complained to the Federal Election Commission after early-voting sites barred observers when thousands of Invisible-Ohioans arrived at the polls aboard hundreds of invisible ACORN buses. In Ida Grove, Iowa, Ida County Registrar Debby Ballard expressed concern when a convoy of Chicago ACORN semis submitted 4,000,000 provisional ballots, 17 seconds before a 5 pm deadline.

"I'm proud that Ida County can boast of a 114,312% voter registration rate, but I'm not sure if I can get all of them processed by Monday," said Ballard. "I've got a pilates class in Sioux City."
Posted by: CrazyFool || 10/10/2008 01:11 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  i can't even believe they would let this lawsuit into a court. A nd IF they lose they should be made too pay for every dime of it. Criminals are charged court cost so should civil suits
Posted by: chris || 10/10/2008 12:18 Comments || Top||

#2  It's a satire.
Posted by: lotp || 10/10/2008 12:28 Comments || Top||

#3  In the non-satire veain, even the Seattle papers are carrying articles about the increasing number of ACORN-related votoer fraud issues popping up all over the US. its almost like its planned.....
Posted by: USN, Ret. || 10/10/2008 14:34 Comments || Top||

#4  lotp, i've read so much BS in the last few years i don't know the diff anymore
Posted by: chris || 10/10/2008 17:08 Comments || Top||

#5  Actually this can never happen in the Seattle area. Imaginary Americans (and even non-americans) have no problems registering to vote at least in Snohomish County (just north of seattle).

Took my wife in to regiser to vote. They didn't even ask for **any** ID - never mind citizenship - not even a utility bill.

Just said that they would send out a ballot on the 16th by mail (Snohomish County has mandatory vote-by-mail).

ACORN *hearts* Washington State
Posted by: CrazyFool || 10/10/2008 17:30 Comments || Top||


Your investment goals.
Posted by: Besoeker || 10/10/2008 00:00 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Heh. I wouldn't be too sure about that insurance money either.

Your best investment option right now is extra cases of food - and whiskey.
Posted by: Betty || 10/10/2008 5:55 Comments || Top||

#2  And toilet paper - or Zimbucks, whichever is cheaper.
Posted by: Glenmore || 10/10/2008 9:59 Comments || Top||

#3  No, invest in bullets and make a list of people stockpiling. That way you're always prepared and never have a "Y2K" stash rotting away in your basement.
Posted by: whitecollar redneck || 10/10/2008 13:22 Comments || Top||

#4  Also make friends with other well-armed people to be able to overwhelm the occasional food hoarder who happens to be armed.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418 || 10/10/2008 14:20 Comments || Top||


Home Front: WoT
"Why We Fight Now" - US Army Special Forces Command
Sir:

Thank you for your interest in documentary, "Why We Fight - Now". As you can probably guess, we are extremely excited about getting this product out to various audiences and one way we hope to accomplish this is by getting the movie aired on network television. It is still too early to say which, if any, network will pick this movie up. Once there is a decision, we will post that information at the following website: Please check there often because we are going to try and update it as we get new information.
V/R
Augie
Captain Chris Augustine
Public Affairs Officer
U.S. Army Special Forces Command (Airborne)
Commercial: (910) 432-4587
Blackberry: (910) 689-6187
NIPR: augustch@soc.mil
ako: christopher.augustine@us.army.mil
SIPR: augustch@usasoc.socom.smil.mil

Posted by: Besoeker || 10/10/2008 00:00 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  by getting the movie aired on network television

Maybe The One will include it in his massive purchase of network prime time on Oct 29..... ooooppps -- I just woke up from a dream!
Posted by: Sherry || 10/10/2008 0:19 Comments || Top||

#2  I'll be looking forward to seeing this...but it still begs the question of why, why, WHY stuff like this didn't start being put together seven years ago. One of G-Dub's myriad mistakes in the GWOT was the failure to start up the modern equivalent of this outfit. I'm just an ex-enlisted squid with a commuter-school business degree, and even I knew on 9/11 that the MSM would be in full fifth-column mode in no more than six months, and that a successful war effort would necessitate getting the good guys' case out to the public over the MSM's heads.
Posted by: Ricky bin Ricardo (Abu Babaloo) || 10/10/2008 0:35 Comments || Top||

#3  In addition to the Office of War Information Bush should have sold war bonds as a way for people to show their support, provide the gov with a flush of cash, and prevented the massive budget spending that occurred. Yeah I know they'd have to be paid back eventually but so will the deficit spending dollars.
Posted by: rjschwarz || 10/10/2008 1:22 Comments || Top||

#4  I agree - but I think we all share the blame.   Bush got beat up badly starting on 9/12/2001 and we did not vocally and publicly stand up for him or for the war.   Congress and the media respond to credible pressure, if it's large and loud enough.  We didn't supply it.   And so he caved and wiggled and spent like a drunken sailor to keep the Dems at arm's length while continuing the war.

Remember too that the military and the feds DID try some of this and got huge pushback from the left. So we ended up with the 'truth' firmly locked into everyones' minds: there were no WMDs, we kill civilians and torture prisoners, etc etc.
Posted by: lotp || 10/10/2008 6:51 Comments || Top||

#5  I blame Bush.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble || 10/10/2008 7:05 Comments || Top||

#6  All wars have two fronts. The point of combat and the one at home. The generals at the Pentagon never have wanted to fight the second one. Go look at the effort in the national mobilization in WWII when the MSM was actually on our side. Now compare it to the efforts since. They outsourced the telling of the story to the MSM, who we pretty much understand worked as the conduit for the enemy. They never questioned their actions or veracity of their propaganda, but undermined and undercut our boys at every opportunity. That which they could not explode out of proportion, they literally made up. Now the Generals(tm) keep crying they don't want to become involved in politics. However, that means they have no say in the Home Front War. How has that worked out for them? They 'study' Clausewitz at the War College, but they ignore his dictum "war is nothing but the continuation of policy with other means". They're in politics whether they like it or not and they have to play the game.
Posted by: Procopius2k || 10/10/2008 9:02 Comments || Top||

#7  I'm sure this will get plenty of air-time under an Obama Administration.

/s
Posted by: Woozle Unusosing8053 || 10/10/2008 9:58 Comments || Top||

#8  The generals at the Pentagon never have wanted to fight the second one.

There's a reason. Or maybe two.
Posted by: General James Mattoon Scoot || 10/10/2008 10:24 Comments || Top||

#9  I'll be looking forward to seeing this...but it still begs the question of why, why, WHY stuff like this didn't start being put together seven years ago.

Because there were de facto restrictions placed on the military in getting their side of the story out on the domestic front? Seems I recall attempts to set up such things, which were not only met by alarmed cries of "propoganda", but threats of legal financial action.



Posted by: Pappy || 10/10/2008 14:02 Comments || Top||


Home Front Economy
Nuff Said
Posted by: Procopius2k || 10/10/2008 07:41 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  As someone stated yesterday on the Burg, "the market could be reacting to a potential Obama presidency." If McCain can turn it around, it will certainly be interesting to see if the market trends upward.
Posted by: Besoeker || 10/10/2008 9:54 Comments || Top||

#2  "If McCain can turn it around.."

Since McCain is weak on economy and proposed more bailout money ($300 billion) against his many of his base, I don't see how the market would feel more confident unless he pulled a rabbit out of his hat. I hope he can, we all need some good ideas.
Posted by: Clineth Gonque1423 || 10/10/2008 11:45 Comments || Top||

#3  --- I think participants in the market & those of us waiting on the sidelines have more confidence in McCain than in Obama as far as managing the crisis. No way to tell for sure, until the day after the Election.
--- Keep in mind that change is inevitable despite the Big 0's promises. Our predicaments will be quite different by Election Day, and also by Inauguration Day.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418 || 10/10/2008 14:39 Comments || Top||

#4  IIUC, CNN + CNBC > Washington desires to buy shares in failing US Banks but widout using the labels "NATIONALIZATION" or "GOVT. OWNERSHIP".

D *** NG IT, WE WANT TO MAKE IT ABSOLUTELY CATEGORICALLY POSITIVELY UNDENIABLY
................., FINGER-POINTING CLEAR TO THE AMER PEOPLE, ITS NOT SOCIALISM - ITS GOVERNMENTISM AND GOVT.CENTRIC REGULATION, ETC. AND DON'T YOUSE FERGIT IT!
Posted by: JosephMendiola || 10/10/2008 21:40 Comments || Top||


When banks find it hard to borrow, so do the rest of us
Superb tutorial in The Economist on the problems the banks face, and how it affects us.
Posted by: Steve White || 10/10/2008 00:00 || Comments || Link || [4 views] Top|| File under:

#1  It's business as usual. When they ran a tv ad they id Sen. Dodd as making this all possible. I thought it was an election ad parody. YJCMTSU.
Posted by: Procopius2k || 10/10/2008 0:12 Comments || Top||

#2  Obviously homes and automobiles are generally an exception, but what ever happened to PAYING CASH?
Posted by: Besoeker || 10/10/2008 9:08 Comments || Top||

#3  A society that allows leftists to mock and deride middle class virtues ends up like this.   If the society is smart it re-learns what the Gods of the Copybooks have been teaching.  If it's not, it dies one way or the other.
Posted by: lotp || 10/10/2008 9:24 Comments || Top||

#4  The market was down another 10% in the first half hour this morning. Dow broke under 8000. Lowest in 10 years.
Posted by: Glenmore || 10/10/2008 9:56 Comments || Top||

#5  I think the DOW numbers are broken. Yahoo finance lists the DOW jumping from -160 to -900. My brokerage acocunt say +10 and NASDAQ +22.
Posted by: ed || 10/10/2008 10:09 Comments || Top||

#6  Word, Partier. And that's why this election is so important. We're going to make a decision about who we want to be, one way or another. I hope we can do it at the election.

One thing that occurs to me is that the delay between the election and the inauguration needs to be shortened. We son't need a repeat of the 1932 fiasco. And with communications as swift as they are, there is no reason the victor should not enter office December 1.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble || 10/10/2008 10:19 Comments || Top||

#7  Except its an Electoral College system. Florida 2000. The courts aren't set up for one clean clearing of issues. It's all one court and one appeal at a time. Filing and refiling each step up the ladder.
Posted by: Procopius2k || 10/10/2008 10:49 Comments || Top||

#8  "A society that allows leftists to mock and deride middle class virtues ends up like this."

I don't buy it. I've been watching the Dems as powerless for the last 8 years. Wasn't it a society of conservatives who were in power since 2000 and promoted a house for everyone? To deregulate as much as possible?

Warren Buffet, #1 manager of money and quite generous guy, is called it poetic justice.

Same thing for the election.
Posted by: Clineth Gonque1423 || 10/10/2008 11:39 Comments || Top||

#9  We don't need a repeat of the 1932 fiasco

Was there something fishy in Roosevelt's election?
Posted by: JFM || 10/10/2008 11:42 Comments || Top||

#10  A whole 8 years, heh?

I've been watching both parties for 50 some years now.  I lived through the 60s and 70s and watched the intentional, all-out war of the left on the 'bourgeois' values of the middle class - on the streets, in intentionally crude and corrosive popular culture, via promotion of abortion on demand without parental notification, through the creation of a massive welfare apparatus and above all through lawfare.

And by the way, the Dems have controlled Congress for the last few years. 
Posted by: lotp || 10/10/2008 11:47 Comments || Top||

#11  Yeah, 8 years of bad managment and close-mindedness can drive any country or company into the ground.

It's plenty of time to do damage. To blow our surplus and add 5 trillion to our debt, our reputation, our confidence, and our dignity.
Posted by: Clineth Gonque1423 || 10/10/2008 11:55 Comments || Top||

#12  And I don't think Dem's in power have anything to do with it. They came in Congress since 2006, after most of the momentum already was there.

So just about 2 years in Nov. Of that, 6 of those 8 years have been Republican. I don't see the point of that last point.
Posted by: Clineth Gonque1423 || 10/10/2008 11:59 Comments || Top||

#13  I've been watching the Dems as powerless for the last 8 years.

The Democrats have had simple majorities in both House and Senate since the 2006 election. That they haven't been able to pass the legislation they desired -- defunding the military, rescinding tax decreases, mandating Kyoto standards -- has been a function of extremely inept party leadership, not powerlessness. The only real success the Democrats can claim during their period of power is ramming through that abortion of a "Rescue Package" last week, all $850 billion and 450 pages of it. The house for everyone thingy was a Democrat-required regulation put on the mortgage industry when President Clinton lived in the White House, expanded by Democrat-headed Congressional committees as payoff for permitting the current administration their war on terror. Do try to pay closer attention, dear Clineth Gonque1423.
Posted by: trailing wife || 10/10/2008 12:03 Comments || Top||

#14  ---- AFAIK, the fiasco of 1932 was the continuing decline of the US economy between Election Day in November 1932 to Inauguration Day in March in 1933. When FDR took office a nationwide run on banks (with many closing permanently) was well under way. Hoover tried to coordinate his efforts with the President-elect, who ignored him completely while things went from bad to worse. One of the first things FDR did officially was order a Bank Holiday.
---- The situation is much more complicated than it was in 1932-3. The Powers That Be seem almost clueless. The candidates promise a lot, but are not promising, if you get my drift, and I think you do.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418 || 10/10/2008 14:15 Comments || Top||

#15  Clineth has a point. I distinctly remember the Democrats as the minority party trying to filibuster the big budget increases George Bush put forward. Shut the Senate for weeks, they did, until the Republicans relented and cut the budget.

The Democrats have always stood for good management. That's why they've gone through the budget with a fine-tooth comb to eliminate waste and excess in government. Where did you Barack Obama got that idea, anyway? Why it was Nancy Pelosi and Stoney Hoyer who have pushed for tighter regulation of government spending.

And the Democrats have been solid on earmarks. Robert Byrd has been a real leader in that regard.

And of course the Democrats pushed real hard to regulate Freddie and Fannie. Why, we have C-SPAN video showing Barney Frank and Chris Dodd demanding that we rein in the excesses.

So you're right, Clineth, the Democrats shouldn't be blamed for any of this.
Posted by: Steve White || 10/10/2008 14:11 Comments || Top||

#16  Please, Steve White, use the /sarc on ; /sarc off tags! I almost had a stroke! ;->
Posted by: Uncle Phester || 10/10/2008 14:22 Comments || Top||

#17  I am a non-partisan blamer. The housing for everyone thingy needs to have a wooden stake driven through its heart.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418 || 10/10/2008 14:22 Comments || Top||

#18  I am a non-partisan blamer. The housing for everyone thingy needs to have a wooden stake driven through its heart.

I got my doubts about that. I suspect if policy weren't so hostile to heavy industry in this country we could "solve" the problems with Wall Street by making the mortgages good again.
Posted by: Tranquil Mechanical Yeti || 10/10/2008 14:54 Comments || Top||

#19  There is plenty of blame to go around on this one. Both parties have plenty to regret and learn from. I suggest the best place to look for culpability is in the mirror.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble || 10/10/2008 17:26 Comments || Top||

#20  AH9418 was spot on. In fact Roosevelt pointedly and publicly refused to speak to Hoover, thus assuring any effectiveness Hoover might have had was thoroughly undermined. The current donks learned from a master.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble || 10/10/2008 17:28 Comments || Top||

#21  The current donks learned from a master.

History has been conveniently re-written on FDR. Older folks in fly-over country remember precisely when the government give-away programs began. Like Pearl Harbor, they came about on FDR's watch. I remember some saying in the 1950's and 60's "if the SOB hadn't died in office, he would have STILL been president." The 22nd Amendment was passed as a direct result of Roosevelt's tenure. Presidents prior to FDR had operated under a gentleman's agreement or understanding that two terms was all anyone should aspire to.
Posted by: Besoeker || 10/10/2008 19:00 Comments || Top||

#22  A precedent set by George Washington.
Posted by: lotp || 10/10/2008 21:18 Comments || Top||

#23  I'm watching to see the capital flight begin when people with money realize what Obama has in mind. Obama's going to make criminals of a lot of people who will be getting their money out of the US any way they can.
Posted by: Jolutch Mussolini7800 || 10/10/2008 22:33 Comments || Top||



Who's in the News
60[untagged]
5TTP
4Taliban
3al-Qaeda in Pakistan
2al-Qaeda
1Jamaat-e-Islami
1Mahdi Army
1Islamic Courts
1TNSM
1Govt of Iran

Bookmark
E-Mail Me

The Classics
The O Club
Rantburg Store
The Bloids
The Never-ending Story
Thugburg
Gulf War I
The Way We Were
Bio

Merry-Go-Blog











On Sale now!


A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.

Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.

Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has dominated Mexico for six years.
Click here for more information

Meet the Mods
In no particular order...
Steve White
Seafarious
tu3031
badanov
sherry
ryuge
GolfBravoUSMC
Bright Pebbles
trailing wife
Gloria
Fred
Besoeker
Glenmore
Frank G
3dc
Skidmark

Two weeks of WOT
Fri 2008-10-10
  15 dead in suicide blast at Pakistan tribal meeting
Thu 2008-10-09
  Boom Bitch Kills 10 in Diyala Province
Wed 2008-10-08
  World's Stock Markets Plunge
Tue 2008-10-07
  Iran forces down Corporate Executive ''Fighter Jet''
Mon 2008-10-06
  Saudi hosts Afghan peace talks with Taliban reps
Sun 2008-10-05
  Baitullah makes appearance amid reports of his death
Sat 2008-10-04
  US drone strikes kill 20 in North Waziristan
Fri 2008-10-03
  'Biggest suspect' in ship piracy arrested
Thu 2008-10-02
  U.S. Begins Transferring Sunni Militias to Iraqi Government
Wed 2008-10-01
  Baitullah reported titzup
Tue 2008-09-30
  ISI chief, four corps commanders changed
Mon 2008-09-29
  At least six dead in Tripoli kaboom
Sun 2008-09-28
  Sudan desert chase 'n gunfight kills 6 kidnappers
Sat 2008-09-27
  Car boom kills 17 in Damascus
Fri 2008-09-26
  Shots fired in US-Pakistan clash


Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
18.217.220.114
Help keep the Burg running! Paypal:
WoT Operations (23)    WoT Background (19)    Non-WoT (19)    Local News (9)    (0)