Hi there, !
Today Wed 12/16/2015 Tue 12/15/2015 Mon 12/14/2015 Sun 12/13/2015 Sat 12/12/2015 Fri 12/11/2015 Thu 12/10/2015 Archives
Rantburg
532976 articles and 1859845 comments are archived on Rantburg.

Today: 62 articles and 216 comments as of 1:42.
Post a news link    Post your own article   
Area: WoT Operations    WoT Background    Non-WoT        Politix   
Gambia now an Islamic republic, says President
Today's Headlines
Headline Comments [Views]
Page 4: Opinion
5 16:25 Frank G [2] 
0 [1] 
5 22:43 JosephMendiola [4] 
8 22:58 SteveS [3] 
1 19:38 JohnQC [1] 
0 [] 
0 [] 
2 18:30 Abu Uluque [2] 
3 17:24 DarthVader [1] 
14 22:26 USN, Ret. [3] 
Page 1: WoT Operations
11 19:58 49 Pan [1]
1 19:47 JohnQC [1]
2 19:24 JohnQC []
8 23:04 JosephMendiola [2]
0 [11]
0 [1]
9 20:04 JosephMendiola [3]
5 19:14 Zenobia Floger6220 []
0 [3]
0 [2]
6 20:56 Sven the pelter [4]
0 [2]
0 [2]
0 [2]
5 09:55 Procopius2k [3]
1 07:31 3dc [3]
0 [4]
0 [1]
2 15:27 Old Patriot [4]
4 12:51 Redneck Jim [1]
0 []
0 [2]
4 14:06 Sven the pelter [5]
0 [4]
Page 2: WoT Background
1 16:35 AlanC [1]
2 22:21 USN, Ret. [7]
11 11:47 DarthVader []
0 [1]
0 [2]
13 23:07 JosephMendiola [3]
5 19:04 Rob Crawford [8]
3 10:55 Glenmore [3]
0 [1]
0 [1]
1 08:16 Mike Kozlowski [7]
2 12:36 Frank G [1]
9 17:48 BrerRabbit [1]
0 []
12 22:54 CrazyFool [2]
0 [3]
5 23:15 JosephMendiola [4]
Page 3: Non-WoT
6 22:03 trailing wife [3]
1 20:01 JosephMendiola [3]
8 15:57 Chaith Oppressor of the Lutherans1517 [1]
7 23:30 JosephMendiola [5]
2 13:30 Frank G [1]
0 [1]
0 [3]
Page 6: Politix
5 16:58 Zenobia Floger6220 []
18 21:26 Barbara [3]
6 20:36 rjschwarz [5]
3 19:33 JohnQC [3]
-Short Attention Span Theater-
This Week in Books
It was my intention to be reviewing The Conquerors - How Portugal Forged The First Global Empire.

However, I did not receive my copy until last Tuesday. I am shy of a quarter of the way through, sailing with Vasco de Gama. So far, I am enjoying it, but obviously I cannot review it this week.

So, I am going to share my favorite part of my most re-read book.

The French Recipe Cookbook
Carole Clements & Elizabeth Wolf-Cohen
Anness Publishing Limited, 1995

Boeuf Bourguignon, Page 158

3.5 lbs lean stewing meat (chuck or shin)
6 oz lean salt pork or thick bacon
3 tbsp. butter
0.75 lb pearl onions
0.75 lb button mushrooms
1 onion, finely chopped
1 carrot, finely chopped
2 or 3 cloves garlic, finely chopped
3 tbsp. flour
3 cups red wine, preferably Burgundy
1.5 tbsp. tomato paste
bouquet garni
2.5-3 cups beef broth
1 tbsp. chopped fresh parsley
salt and freshly ground black pepper

It is a time of year when there are many potluck or bring a dish to dinner events, which means casserole season. This is an excellent alternative that can be made a day in advance, even tasting better as the ingredients get to know each other. I will put comments in after each step.

Cut the beef into 2 inch pieces and dice the salt pork or cut the bacon into thin strips.

Save yourself a half hour and buy the meat already cut, and use kitchen shears to cut the bacon.

In a large heavy flameproof casserole, cook the pork or bacon over medium heat until golden brown, then remove with a slotted spoon and drain. Pour off all but 2 tbsp. of the fat.

You are rendering fat here, not so much cooking the bacon, so low and slow. I prefer to keep all the fat, to make a heartier meal, so save enough to coat the pan to help brown the beef. If you pour it all out, substitute butter or oil. I use a large pan I can put directly from the burner to the oven.

Increase heat to medium-high. Add enough meat to the pan to fit easily in one layer (do not crowd the pan or the meat will not brown) and cook, turning to color all sides, until well browned. Transfer the beef to a plate and continue browning the meat in batches.

This will all go into the oven; if the pan you are browning with is not what will go into the oven, the browned meat can go right to your ovenware.

In a heavy frying pan, melt one-third of the butter over medium heat, add the pearl onions and cook, stirring frequently, until evenly golden. Set aside on a plate.

Now, I disagree. The onions and mushrooms should be added to the stew towards the end of the cooking to preserve their respective textures and flavors. Skip this step for now and come back after placing your ovenware.

In the same pan, melt half of the remaining butter over medium heat. Add the mushrooms and sauté, stirring frequently, until golden, then set aside with the pearl onions.

As I said, skip for now and get the beef in the oven, it will save you thirty minutes.

When all the beef has been browned, pour off any fat from the casserole and add the remaining butter. When the butter has melted, add the onion, carrot, and garlic and cook over medium for 3-4 minutes until just softened, stirring frequently. Sprinkle the flour and cook for 2 minutes, then add the wine, tomato paste and bouquet garni. Bring to a boil, scraping the base of the pan.

This is a good time to quote the book:

Tradition dictates that you should use the same wine in this stew that you plan to serve with it, but a less expensive full-bodied wine will do for cooking. The stew reheats very well.

Just so long as the chef is able to drink it. Oh, and don't overcook the garlic. You can make your own bouquet garni using cheesecloth, though I am sure they can be bought, and there are pre-made empty packets similar to tea bags.

Return the beef and bacon to the casserole and pour on the broth, adding more if needed to cover the meat and vegetables when pressed down. Cover the casserole and simmer very gently over low heat, stirring occasionally, for about 3 hours or until the meat is very tender. Add the sautéed mushrooms and pearl onions and cook, covered, for 30 minutes more. Discard the bouquet garni and stir in the parsley before serving.

See, three hours to prep and sauté the onions and mushrooms. When I made that adjustment I cut my prep-to-oven time thirty minutes. And yes - fresh parsley, the dried stuff does not do it.

I have made many adjustments, such as trying different wines and using coarse cut onion instead of pearl onions, but my favorite is cutting the carrots into circles instead of dicing. Saves prep time, and gives the stew a different appearance.

It serves well on its own, and also serves well over mashed potatoes or rice.

I have never done it, but I do not see why it could not be made in a large crock pot.

Leaving the fat in serves us (two adults and one child) three meals, all of the fat out is two meals, in between is in between.

The book itself is large, with full color pictures, a nice introduction, and is organized as one would expect. It claims over 200 recipes and everything I have made has been good, and fun to expand upon - the Apple Tart (page 188) I have used different kinds of apples and/or pears. After the Desserts Chapter, which a person can get lost in and includes sorbet and crepe recipes, is a Basics which covers stocks and sauces and pastry.

For fun, I looked up this recipe in my grandmother's Time Life French food book, 1968, and it pairs almost exactly with this one. Not necessarily the case with others, where the olde school calls for ingredients many consider unhealthy, such as the use of lard.
Link is to Amazon's 1995 edition, there is also a 1998 reprint.
Posted by: swksvolFF || 12/13/2015 00:00 || Comments || Link || [3 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Let's eat!
Posted by: badanov || 12/13/2015 0:12 Comments || Top||

#2  swksvolFF: in the recipe, what is the oven temperature, and do you use regular beef broth or low sodium?

I like it at 325F, 350F is good too, would not go much above that for three and a half hours or else the carrots/onions get a bit mushy. What I have found is that it needs just a small boil, a rolling boil is not only messy but mushy unless cutting cooking time. This is a recipe for the tough meats so low and slow, for me, is the goal.

As for sodium and other ingredients, the golden rule is once you put it in, you can't take it out, so for sharing yes low sodium people can always add salt.

The other rule is that soups/stews can only be as good as the broth. Obviously making one's own broth takes some time, so when buying stock I go with the richest most flavorful broth available.

*All that said, I am a standard carrier for the richer is healthier camp, as one serving cures the stomach instead of two. A very healthy dish anyways, nothing wrong with two servings especially on a cold windy morning like this out ourzway.

Thick cut, warm, quality bread is almost a must.
Posted by: swksvolFF || 12/13/2015 9:58 Comments || Top||

#3  More Sugar!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Alaska Paul || 12/13/2015 16:50 Comments || Top||

#4  I have a hunk of venison in the freezer and a bottle of old vines Zinfandel - looks like a perfect fit!
Posted by: Glenmore || 12/13/2015 17:27 Comments || Top||

#5  What's 'bouquet garni'? - the only things I consistently add to my version of this are fresh rosemary and thyme.
Posted by: Glenmore || 12/13/2015 17:34 Comments || Top||

#6  According to the book:

A bunch of herbs, usually including a bay leaf, thyme sprigs, and parsley stalks, used to impart flavor during cooking, often tied for easy removal.


I also use rosemary, sometimes oregano, really anything to flavor the broth without having to eat it, bay leaves especially.

I take about a 6" square piece of cheesecloth, set it down like a diamond, put the herbs on the cheesecloth so they are secured in a burrito roll, then tie the ends together like a tortellini. When I stir during cooking, I give it a squeeze like when making tea. When the food it done, the satchel comes out and into the trash, no bay leaves or rosemary crunch, stringy bits etc. in the food.

Moar Sugar?
Chocolate Loaf with Coffee Sauce
Marquise au Chocolat
Page 221

Recipes may be my punt.

Ideally, kids and I will make the Bourguignon and French Onion soup on Saturday. Sunday, wife will bake bread and make mashed potatoes while kids and I make a Pear Tart. Dinner is salad with herbed vinaigrette, steamed artichoke with garlic butter sauce, fresh bread with butter, bowl of French Onion soup, Boeuf Bourguignon served over mashed potatoes, Pear Tart.

So good, it'll make you want to go to the range and drop your rifle. I kid, I kid.
Posted by: swksvolFF || 12/13/2015 18:37 Comments || Top||

#7  Cook's Illustrated has a coq au vin recipe where the bouquet garni comprises 1 tsp. dried thyme, 10 sprigs of parsley, and a bay leaf. Wikipedia says

There is no generic recipe for bouquet garni, but most recipes include thyme and bay leaf. Depending on the recipe, the bouquet garni may also include parsley, basil, burnet, chervil, rosemary, peppercorns, savory and tarragon. Vegetables such as carrot, celery (leaves or leaf stalks), celeriac, leek, onion and parsley root are sometimes included in the bouquet.

But it seems to me Wikipedia is venturing into the concept of removable flavorants, well beyond the traditional thing itself in French cooking.
Posted by: trailing wife || 12/13/2015 22:20 Comments || Top||

#8  What's 'bouquet garni'?

It is French for "a handful of leaves".
Posted by: SteveS || 12/13/2015 22:58 Comments || Top||


Why Ted Cruz Is Worse Than Donald Trump
[GoodMenProject] If you can’t stand the thought of Donald Trump becoming president, the good news is that Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) looks poised to upset him in the pivotal Iowa caucuses next month.
A lot can happen in 30 days, but in my mind that is cause for encouragement.
The bad news is that if Cruz succeeds and ultimately becomes the Republican nominee, he will prove to be far worse than Trump himself.
Or better, depending on your point of view.
For one thing, Cruz has proved himself to be far more ideologically narrow-minded than Trump. For better or worse, Trump has been willing to defy conservative dogma on a number of issues (e.g., social security reform, progressive taxation, the 2003 ),
Oh dear. Once again professional journalists and their editors completely miss something basic, in this case completing the thought. The writer is talking about Mr. Trump wishing Nancy Pelosi had impeached President George W. Bush over the 2003 invasion of Iraq.
indicating that at the very least he has a mind of his own. Cruz, on the other hand, has refused to waiver from the tenets of Tea Party doctrine even when the fate of America depended on it. That last statement isn’t an exaggeration, by the way—anyone with a reasonably comprehensive memory can recall his instrumental role in causing a government shutdown at the end of 2013, one that business interests and moderates across the board vehemently opposed.
Somehow I don't consider making a bloated government bureaucracy even fatter an existential issue with regard to the nation. It should be cut back and reined in for no other reason than the notion that a smaller, less powerful government can't harm its own citizens as much as a large, out of control government, which we have now. As to the dire warnings of the Tea Partier, I am a Tea Partier, and I just want government to become small, much smaller, and take much less that it currently does; to live within its means as practically every other entity on the planet must do. It's a freedom thing.
He has also, incidentally, emerged as the only Republican candidate to unequivocally side with Trump when it comes to all of his bigoted comments about women, Muslims, and Hispanics (despite Trump’s willingness to attack Cruz’s own Cuban heritage). Not only does this mean that Cruz is literally no better than Trump when it comes to the worst things Trump has said, but he has openly and cravenly parroted The Donald in order to benefit from the phenomena that have fueled the billionaire’s campaign. In short, if and when Cruz emerges as the “underdog” alternative who beats Trump at the last minute, this will not be a victory against the forces of darkness that Trump represents—indeed, it will be a confirmation of their ultimate triumph.

What can good people do about this? I suggest three things:

Hold Cruz as accountable as we did Trump. It will be tempting to celebrate Cruz’s victory on the grounds that at least that dastardly Trump is out of the way, so we’ll need to remember that the problem with Trump was what he said and believed, not merely who he was. If we substitute one Trump for another, that isn’t progress.
I doubt our paid press will stop crawling up Cruz's ass. As for progress, Barky's resignation and exit would be a good place to start.
Work to elect the Democratic candidate for the good of the country. This is one of those rare elections in which the partisan rhetoric stating “you must vote X for the good of America” is all too accurate. As with Trump, the election of Cruz to the presidency would signal a reactionary rejection of the progress made for marginalized groups in this country over the past few decades—for African Americans still struggling to attain full civil rights, for Hispanic and Muslim immigrants who come here seeking a better life only to face discrimination, for women fighting patriarchal institutions and members of the LGBT community who need the post-Obergefell precedents to remain in place.
Hahahahahaha! Oh wait. You were serious?
Learn from what we are witnessing today. When this political madness has ended, we need to make sure that the lessons from this toxic election cycle are permanently embedded into our national consciousness. Trump and Cruz have emerged as frontrunners by playing off of the American electorate’s basest prejudices, and this ordeal will have amounted to nothing if we simply wipe the slate clean and refuse to learn from these mistakes in the future.
Maybe, but I think it is much more likely they are saying what people want to hear, whether you want to accept it or not.
When I think of the possibility of a Cruz presidency, I recall the recent words of Bob Dole, the former Kansas Senator and 1996 Republican presidential candidate. “[Cruz’s] achievements are shutting down the government twice, and calling the Republican leader, Mitch McConnell, a liar on the Senate floor,” Dole told MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell earlier this week. “It violates the rules of the Senate. And he doesn’t have a single Senate supporter.”

There is a reason why that historically cliquish body refuses to rally around one of its own as he remains within shooting distance of the GOP presidential nomination—and it’s the same reason you should do likewise. This is a man so devoid of loyalty to anyone but himself that, as Dole put it, “he used to make these speeches. ‘Remember President Dole, do you remember President McCain.’ The inference was that we were all a bunch of liberals, and only he is a true conservative. And he uses the word ‘conservative’ more than he ever uses the word ‘Republican.'”
Dole also lost in 1996.
Cruz is no more a good Republican–or a true conservative, for that matter—than Trump. He is in this for himself and only himself, and if he needs to drag America down to sate his ambition, so be it.
The writer is a student at Lehigh University. The Good Men project is a male feminist website for men who have been neutered.
Posted by: badanov || 12/13/2015 00:00 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Someone on the left understands that Cruz is a committed conservative. I guess some of them are not completely stupid.
Posted by: Raj || 12/13/2015 0:34 Comments || Top||

#2  No, I read that article, he is completely stupid.
Victim class at least.
Posted by: jvalentour || 12/13/2015 1:13 Comments || Top||

#3  Thanks jvalentour.

Beer out the nose burns like a fucking bitch.

:p
Posted by: DarthVader || 12/13/2015 17:24 Comments || Top||


Bangladesh
Put an end to mob justice
[Dhaka Tribune] The incident of eight robbers being beaten to death in Narayanganj once again brings to light the dangers of mob-enforced justice, and just how common the culture of street violence has become.

The robbers were reportedly caught red-handed stealing rice from a store. Disturbingly, out of the eight who were beaten to death, four were killed before the police even arrived on the scene.

While the frustration of locals with the incompetence of law enforcement in the face of repeated robberies is understandable, a culture of dishing out justice without due process is a dangerous one, and flies in the face of our attempts to establish a credible rule of law.

All citizens are entitled to a fair trial before being punished, and that punishment must be decided by the law courts to suit the crime. But because of a growing frustration with the legal system, many citizens are opting to do away with the police altogether and take things into their own hands. The mob mentality that arises from it can get extremely dangerous, as things often spiral out of control.

Ain o Salish Kendra reports that this year alone, between January and September, 104 people have been killed in mob beatings in the country. Almost half of these killings took place in the capital.

These numbers are alarming. We cannot allow chaos to rule our streets. It is up to the government to improve our law enforcement and justice systems so that ordinary citizens can have more faith in them. Furthermore, all perpetrators of mob violence must be brought to book without delay.
"Judge Henry," said Molly Wood, also coming straight to the point, "have you come to tell me that you think well of lynching?"

He met her. "Of burning Southern negroes in public, no. Of hanging Wyoming cattle thieves in private, yes. You perceive there's a difference, don't you?"

"Not in principle," said the girl, dry and short.

"Oh—dear—me!" slowly exclaimed the Judge. "I am sorry that you cannot see that, because I think that I can. And I think that you have just as much sense as I have." The Judge made himself very grave and very good-humored at the same time. The poor girl was strung to a high pitch, and spoke harshly in spite of herself.

"What is the difference in principle?" she demanded.

"Well," said the Judge, easy and thoughtful, "what do you mean by principle?"

"I didn't think you'd quibble," flashed Molly. "I'm not a lawyer myself."

A man less wise than Judge Henry would have smiled at this, and then war would have exploded hopelessly between them, and harm been added to what was going wrong already. But the Judge knew that he must give to every word that the girl said now his perfect consideration.

"I don't mean to quibble," he assured her. "I know the trick of escaping from one question by asking another. But I don't want to escape from anything you hold me to answer. If you can show me that I am wrong, I want you to do so. But," and here the Judge smiled, "I want you to play fair, too."

"And how am I not?"

"I want you to be just as willing to be put right by me as I am to be put right by you. And so when you use such a word as principle, you must help me to answer by saying what principle you mean. For in all sincerity I see no likeness in principle whatever between burning Southern negroes in public and hanging Wyoming horse-thieves in private. I consider the burning a proof that the South is semi-barbarous, and the hanging a proof that Wyoming is determined to become civilized. We do not torture our criminals when we lynch them. We do not invite spectators to enjoy their death agony. We put no such hideous disgrace upon the United States. We execute our criminals by the swiftest means, and in the quietest way. Do you think the principle is the same?"

Molly had listened to him with attention. "The way is different," she admitted.

"Only the way?"

"So it seems to me. Both defy law and order."

"Ah, but do they both? Now we're getting near the principle."

"Why, yes. Ordinary citizens take the law in their own hands."

"The principle at last!" exclaimed the Judge.

"Now tell me some more things. Out of whose hands do they take the law?"

"The court's."

"What made the courts?"

"I don't understand."

"How did there come to be any courts?"

"The Constitution."

"How did there come to be any Constitution? Who made it?"

"The delegates, I suppose."

"Who made the delegates?"

"I suppose they were elected, or appointed, or something."

"And who elected them?"

"Of course the people elected them."

"Call them the ordinary citizens," said the Judge. "I like your term. They are where the law comes from, you see. For they chose the delegates who made the Constitution that provided for the courts. There's your machinery. These are the hands into which ordinary citizens have put the law. So you see, at best, when they lynch they only take back what they once gave. Now we'll take your two cases that you say are the same in principle. I think that they are not. For in the South they take a negro from jail where he was waiting to be duly hung. The South has never claimed that the law would let him go. But in Wyoming the law has been letting our cattle-thieves go for two years. We are in a very bad way, and we are trying to make that way a little better until civilization can reach us. At present we lie beyond its pale. The courts, or rather the juries, into whose hands we have put the law, are not dealing the law. They are withered hands, or rather they are imitation hands made for show, with no life in them, no grip. They cannot hold a cattle-thief. And so when your ordinary citizen sees this, and sees that he has placed justice in a dead hand, he must take justice back into his own hands where it was once at the beginning of all things. Call this primitive, if you will. But so far from being a DEFIANCE of the law, it is an ASSERTION of it—the fundamental assertion of self governing men, upon whom our whole social fabric is based. There is your principle, Miss Wood, as I see it. Now can you help me to see anything different?"

She could not.

"But perhaps you are of the same opinion still?" the Judge inquired.

"It is all terrible to me," she said.

"Yes; and so is capital punishment terrible. And so is war. And perhaps some day we shall do without them. But they are none of them so terrible as unchecked theft and murder would be."

After the Judge had departed on his way to Sunk Creek, no one spoke to Molly upon this subject. But her face did not grow cheerful at once. It was plain from her fits of silence that her thoughts were not at rest. And sometimes at night she would stand in front of her lover's likeness, gazing upon it with both love and shrinking.
The Virginian, by Owen Wister
Judge Henry to Miss Wood after The Virginian & Co. have lynched some horse thieves, among them his old friend.
Posted by: Fred || 12/13/2015 00:00 || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Mob justice exists when - and only when - justice does not.
Posted by: Glenmore || 12/13/2015 1:41 Comments || Top||

#2  Good luck finding any liberals who will listen as well as Molly Wood.
Posted by: Abu Uluque || 12/13/2015 18:30 Comments || Top||


Home Front: WoT
Separating violent and peaceful Islam: Spengler
Spengler walks through how we might separate peaceful and violent Islam. Among the things we'd do is designate the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization, and act accordingly. Interesting and nuanced read for a Sunday morning, and far more insightful than anything you'll see on the Sunday network news shows.
Posted by: Steve White || 12/13/2015 00:00 || Comments || Link || [3 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Support the Caudillos in Dar by all means. Doesn't mean you should let any Muslims into USA---even "peaceful" Muslims are an economic burden (look at "Israeli" Arabs).
Posted by: g(r)omgoru || 12/13/2015 3:19 Comments || Top||

#2  the key is to separate secular from theocratic islam

that is the split that counts

secular islam by definition wants religion a private matter, separate from the state.

it is thus no problem.

they will obey the laws passed by parliament and will not seek to impose islam on everyone else.

theocrats by definition will seek to impose Islam on everyone else

google maajid nawaz and read a bit of what he has to say
Posted by: anon1 || 12/13/2015 5:52 Comments || Top||

#3  a major problem is that peaceful secular moslims can become violent islamists

also two first generation muslims who are both peaceful and secular may have offspring who choose the violent islamist path
Posted by: lord garth || 12/13/2015 9:14 Comments || Top||

#4  Only a reformation to upgrade this Islam to advance to the modern world. Never gonna happen.
Posted by: Dale || 12/13/2015 10:12 Comments || Top||

#5  The true peaceful, secular Muslims, assuming there really are any, have to loudly and continually voice their condemnation of the jihad and confront those in their Muslim communities, publicly about all such issues.

They have to spell out chapter and verse, or sura, what is in the Koran and why all those violent passages do not apply to the modern world and point out often how Islam allows for a separation between Mosque and State. Until they do that then there is no proof that peaceful and secular exist with regards to Muslims.
Posted by: AlanC || 12/13/2015 10:28 Comments || Top||

#6  Put violent Islam in one room, peaceful Islam in another.

One of those rooms will be empty; violence is as essential to Islam as Christ's sacrifice is to Christianity.
Posted by: Rob Crawford || 12/13/2015 11:00 Comments || Top||

#7  It seems that we must teach moslems that causing your enemy death (By any means) is not going to get you to heaven
Posted by: Redneck Jim || 12/13/2015 12:34 Comments || Top||

#8  secular islam by definition wants religion a private matter, separate from the state.

The only problem with that lovely thought is that Islam itself does not make that distinction between state and religions matters that Western Civ does. Everything comes under Sharia law.

IMHO, the separation of Church and State is one of the more clever bits in the US Constitution.
Posted by: SteveS || 12/13/2015 15:13 Comments || Top||

#9  Make Muslim women read Lysistrata.
Posted by: Abu Uluque || 12/13/2015 18:33 Comments || Top||

#10  Dunno if that'd work though. After all, there will always be goats.
Posted by: Abu Uluque || 12/13/2015 18:48 Comments || Top||

#11  God will sort them out.
Posted by: JohnQC || 12/13/2015 19:35 Comments || Top||

#12  Lysistrata... there will always be goats

Will Muslimahs heed Lysistrata,
Declaring their Muslims non grata?
For bestowing wild oats,
There will always be goats
And boys kids who will sadly bleat, "Dada!"
Posted by: Zenobia Floger6220 || 12/13/2015 19:35 Comments || Top||

#13  Secular and theocratic Islam are only a matter of timing and numbers. According to the Koran they should get along while they are in a weak position and assert themselves when the opportunity finally presents itself. Worldwide they have sensed weakness and are asserting left and right.
Posted by: rjschwarz || 12/13/2015 20:35 Comments || Top||

#14  Separating fly sh!t from pepper would be easier
Posted by: USN, Ret. || 12/13/2015 22:26 Comments || Top||


India-Pakistan
Salman Khan's hit-and-run case: Was the car drunk?
[DAWN] Prem acquittal dhan se payo, Salman Khan's iconic screen name was trending on Twitter minutes after the High Court allowed him to walk free as the prosecution failed to establish its case against him.

The actor had been accused of killing a man sleeping on a footpath and injuring four others with his SUV in 2002. One of the men lost his foot, but Salman was hardly 'Being Human' when he decided not to stop and help.

Salman had reportedly been drinking that night but it seems the prosecution failed to convince the judge that Salman's cup was all full and not with water. In India, where not a lot surprises us, the Twitterati wanted an important answer:

If neither Salman nor his driver is guilty then was "the car drunk"?

In India, perhaps just like in Pakistain, governments can change but court cases still have a life of their own. Witnesses die, Witnesses become 'unreliable', documents go missing and as happened earlier in Salman's case, a faithful (or bought out?) driver takes the blame.

And now, it seems even the driver wasn't in the driving seat. A bewildered public is wondering 'if India had a driverless car much before Google's plans to invent one'?

It is not unusual for even the ordinary man to underestimate the influence of alcohol, especially in the recklessness of youth. I don't doubt that some of the loudest voices against Salman right now are those who drive back home equally inebriated every Saturday night.

But if you know you have killed, then you must also stand up and take the blame. We are being naïve if we hope that at least the influential among us will admit their mistake and repent. But then, who doesn't pull out all contacts when in trouble? Yet, some are more equal than others.
Posted by: Fred || 12/13/2015 00:00 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:


Madressah reforms
[DAWN] IN the National Action Plan (NAP), points 10 and 18 convey the state's resolve to register and regulate madressahs and eradicate sectarian terrorism. Both actions fall primarily within the preview of the criminal justice system but we are still far from achieving these objectives. We need to undertake a forensic analysis of the madressah landscape in Pakistain before we can move forward.

The commonalities and differences bet­ween formal education and madressahs can be identified through a diagnostic approach whose terms of reference should include the following: what percentage of school dropouts is attracted by madressahs? Is there any established link of madressah curriculums with militancy and terrorism? Are madressahs really spreading sectarianism and extremism? Is integration of madressahs into the formal education system a viable option?

Would it be appropriate to reform madressahs in isolation or should such reforms be part of broader educational reforms? What are the hurdles in communication between government and madressahs? What is the actual number of madressahs and their students?

Where schools are absent, madressahs are an alternate educational facility. Our madressahs have multi-dimensional characteristics, including political, sectarian and foreign leanings. According to the report The Madressah Conundrum, there are approximately 35,000 seminaries in Pakistain. Organised under five boards of different ideologies, most of them are of Deobandi and Barelvi persuasion and, according to media reports, are imparting religious education to approximately 3.5 million students.

There has been a mushroom growth in the number of women's madressahs, and the reasons for this should be explored. Although a clear breakdown of male and female madressahs is unavailable, it is estimated that girl students constitute 30pc of the total strength.

Foreign students in madressahs are not really an issue. Over the years, strict government regulations as well as the obsolete curriculums taught at madressahs, have led to a 74pc reduction in foreign students' enrolment. In 2006, there were 10,117 foreign students from 45 countries enrolled in Pak madressahs; currently, the figure is down to 2,673 from 37 countries.
Posted by: Fred || 12/13/2015 00:00 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under: Govt of Pakistan


Israel-Palestine-Jordan
A portrait of the terrorist as a young man, or woman
[IsraelTimes] After 20 years interviewing Paleostinian Lions of Islam in jails, Likud MK Anat Berko tries to explain the motivations of the current attackers

Ever since the current wave of stabbing, shooting and car ramming attacks began two and a half months ago, commentators have expressed perplexity at the seeming pointlessness of it all. Young people, many of them teenagers, set out to stab random Israelis, frequently losing their lives in the process. Are these stabbers lone wolves? Acting out of desperation? Incited by Facebook? What are they hoping to achieve?

Likud MK Anat Berko thinks she knows. Berko, who joined the Knesset this past March after two decades as a criminologist specializing in suicide terrorists, is sui generis. Her politics are aligned with those of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, but during her years of counterterrorism research she became the closest Israeli confidante of many Paleostinian Lions of Islam in Israeli jails.
Continued on Page 49
Posted by: trailing wife || 12/13/2015 06:16 || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:

#1  There was food, rivers of honey and alcohol.

Big Rock Candy Mountain - cue Woody Al-Guthrie
Posted by: M. Murcek || 12/13/2015 7:36 Comments || Top||

#2  One stops such things by reducing the motivations for them. To the extent that the perpetrators are unhappy naive teenagers, killing their daydreams of glory in death would be an effective answer. This could be done by routinely bathing the bodies of dead perps in pig fat, preventing their souls from entering paradise.
But it is incitement that leads to this. The incitement comes allowing it to go unpunished.
Incitement to violence is considered free speech only by Israel, and incitement to violence that actually leads to violence should be punished.
For example, one might order that streets named for murderers must have the names changed to that of their victims with use of the old name leading to demolitions.
Fines should be exacted from those making incitements.
These are perhaps foolish ideas, but if so find better ones, but mere reaction to incidents is not the best way to deal with this problem. Perhaps one should listen carefully to Anat Berko.
Posted by: Grins Snese4215 || 12/13/2015 10:32 Comments || Top||

#3  So, we've got to introduce these children(Mentaly) to the real world.
Posted by: Redneck Jim || 12/13/2015 12:17 Comments || Top||

#4  "prisoners would . . . even give her their babies to hold"

And what the hell exactly are prisoners doing with babies?

They gave birth in jail, you say. Then take the children away from them (and give those kids a chance for a decent life) - unless you can prove the kids personally committed terrorist acts themselves.
Posted by: Barbara || 12/13/2015 15:00 Comments || Top||

#5  sounds like an airdrop of PS4s would kill this
Posted by: Frank G || 12/13/2015 16:25 Comments || Top||


Hamas rocked by dispute over links with Islamic State, and a host of other frictions
[IsraelTimes] Gazoo's terrorist rulers are short of funds, worried by Israeli intelligence successes, torn over how to interact with Iran and the PA

This week once again news reached the Gazoo Strip that a local man had been killed fighting in the ranks of the Islamic State
...formerly ISIS or ISIL, depending on your preference. Before that al-Qaeda in Iraq, as shaped by Abu Musab Zarqawi. They're very devout, committing every atrocity they can find in the Koran and inventing a few more. They fling Allah around with every other sentence, but to hear the pols talk they're not really Moslems....
in Syria. The slain man was named as Issa Lakta, a resident of the Sheikh Radwan neighborhood of Gazoo City.
Continued on Page 49
Posted by: trailing wife || 12/13/2015 00:00 || Comments || Link || [4 views] Top|| File under: Hamas

#1  if Hamas is OK with a 'hope and change' program, I can think of someone who will have some time to advise them in a year or so
Posted by: lord garth || 12/13/2015 0:27 Comments || Top||

#2  Maybe re-think. Find a GOD that actually cares for you, no?
Posted by: newc || 12/13/2015 2:36 Comments || Top||

#3  Iran & Saudis are both having a cash flow problems?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru || 12/13/2015 5:36 Comments || Top||

#4  and the Egyptian Venice-Canal plan
Posted by: Frank G || 12/13/2015 14:03 Comments || Top||

#5  "Tossed in the Calaboose" > clearly must mean HOOSEGOW.

IIRC top PA Offcio is warning the PA to MAKE DE FACTO FINAL OR LASTING PEACE WID ISRAEL, OR SEE THE ISIS/ISIL TAKE OVER THE PA.

Read, PA = Paleos to lose their chance for independence + sovereign country to the ISIS/ISIL + Caliphate, to include alleged IS spnsor KSA???

* FYI see ZERO HEDGE> IS THE ISIS SIMPLY A "SAUDI [conquering = imperialist] ARMY IN DISGUISE"?

* THE DISCUSSIONIST > SAUDI ARABIA IS THE NEW SUPERPOWER!?
Posted by: JosephMendiola || 12/13/2015 22:43 Comments || Top||


Olde Tyme Religion
Christian genocide

The US State Department is reportedly about to designate the attacks by the Islamic State terrorist group on the Yazidis as genocide. As commendable as such a diplomatic gesture may be, the question that begs to be asked is, if the Yazidis, why not the Christians?

The 1948 Genocide Convention defines "genocide" as, among other things, "deliberately inflicting on" a religious group "conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part." As Islamic State continues to drive Christians from their homes, seizing their property, and offering them the "choice" between converting to Islam or being massacred, one must conclude that this qualifies as genocide.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru || 12/13/2015 05:47 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:


Terror Networks
What keeps ISIS alive, conspiracy theories or complex politics?
[ENGLISH.ALARABIYA.NET] Many people in the Middle East consider the Islamic State
...formerly ISIS or ISIL, depending on your preference. Before that al-Qaeda in Iraq, as shaped by Abu Musab Zarqawi. They're very devout, committing every atrocity they can find in the Koran and inventing a few more. They fling Allah around with every other sentence, but to hear the pols talk they're not really Moslems....
of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) a U.S. creation.

This sentiment is perhaps felt most strongly by Iraqis, who have since last year seen vast parts of their war-torn country overrun by ISIS bad boys. A recent Washington Post headline read: "Iraqis think the U.S. is in cahoots with the Islamic State, and it is hurting the war."
Continued on Page 49
Posted by: Fred || 12/13/2015 00:00 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under: Islamic State

#1  It's a lack of jobs and global warming (sarc on). These were excuses offered up by Obozo. Sane or not sane?
Posted by: JohnQC || 12/13/2015 19:38 Comments || Top||



Who's in the News
33[untagged]
11Islamic State
3Govt of Pakistan
2TTP
2Arab Spring
2Commies
1Hamas
1Haqqani Network
1Hezbollah
1Houthis
1Govt of Iran
1Palestinian Authority
1Tablighi Jamaat
1Taliban
1Boko Haram

Bookmark
E-Mail Me

The Classics
The O Club
Rantburg Store
The Bloids
The Never-ending Story
Thugburg
Gulf War I
The Way We Were
Bio

Merry-Go-Blog











On Sale now!


A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.

Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.

Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has dominated Mexico for six years.
Click here for more information

Meet the Mods
In no particular order...
Steve White
Seafarious
tu3031
badanov
sherry
ryuge
GolfBravoUSMC
Bright Pebbles
trailing wife
Gloria
Fred
Besoeker
Glenmore
Frank G
3dc
Skidmark

Two weeks of WOT
Sun 2015-12-13
  Gambia now an Islamic republic, says President
Sat 2015-12-12
  US sez 3 ISIS Top Dawgs die in airstrikes
Fri 2015-12-11
  North Korea claims it has hydrogen bomb; experts skeptical
Thu 2015-12-10
  37 killed in Taliban siege at Khandahar airport
Wed 2015-12-09
  Daesh loses large part of Ramadi
Tue 2015-12-08
  Clash among the supporters of Taliban chief and Mullah Rasool leaves 24 dead
Mon 2015-12-07
  Yemen's Aden governor killed in car bombing claimed by Islamic State
Sun 2015-12-06
  AQIM shares responsibility for Mali hotel killings
Sat 2015-12-05
  Still No Confirmation On Reports Of Mullah Mansour's Death
Fri 2015-12-04
  They're here
Thu 2015-12-03
  Syed Farook is religious, sez Dad
Wed 2015-12-02
  Dozens of Houthis killed in major offensive across border from Yemen
Tue 2015-12-01
  Russia Arms Su-34s with Air-to-Air Missiles in Syria for First Time
Mon 2015-11-30
  Suspected Jihadists Attack Cash Truck in Burkina Faso
Sun 2015-11-29
  Pakistan Airstrikes Kill 17 Militants


Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
18.188.66.13
Help keep the Burg running! Paypal:
WoT Operations (24)    WoT Background (17)    Non-WoT (7)    (0)    Politix (4)