|Samiul Haq||Samiul Haq||Darul Uloom Akora Khatak||India-Pakistan||20030603|
|Samiul Haq||Mutahida Majlis-e-Amal||India-Pakistan||20031118|
|Samiul Haq||Jamiat Ulma-e-Islam||India-Pakistan||20040117|
|Samiul Haq||Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam||Afghanistan/South Asia||20040217|
|Samiul Haq||Pak-Afghan Defence Council||Afghanistan/South Asia||20040217|
|Samiul Haq||Milli Yakjehti Council||Afghanistan/South Asia||20040217|
|Samiul Haq||Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal||Afghanistan/South Asia||20040412||Link|
|Samiul Haq||Jamiat Ulema Islam-Samiul Haq||Afghanistan/South Asia||20040412||Link|
|Samiul Haq||Afghan Defense Council||Afghanistan/South Asia||20020114|
|Samiul Haq||Afghanistan Pakistan Defense Council||Afghanistan/South Asia||20020311|
|Samiul Haq||Jamiat ul Ulema-i-Islam||India-Pakistan||20020311|
|Samiul Haq||Jamiat Ulema-e-Islami||India-Pakistan||20020301|
|Samiul Haq||Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Sami||20051219||Link|
|‘Father of Taliban’ Sami-ul-Haq offers conditional support to Afghan peace process|
|[Khaama (Afghanistan)] The leader of Sami (JUI-S) Maulana has offered a conditional support for the in Afghanistan.|
According to a statement released by Maula Sami’s office, the leader of the party has said he is prepared to support the Afghan but the foreign forces must leave the country first.
He has reportedly made the remarks during a meeting with the Afghan ambassador to Pakistain.
The statement further added that the Afghan ambassador met with Maulana Sami to play his part in encouraging the Afghan to peace talks, considering his influential role.
In the meantime, Maulana Sami has called on the government of Pakistain to reconsider its policies in Afghanistan, claiming that India is taking advantage from the ongoing situation in the region.
Maulana Sami is the founder of Haqqani Madrasa in Pakistain from where several key Taliban leaders have graduated and it is believed that he is also having a key influence on the Afghan s, considering the close relations he had with the Taliban founder Mullah Mohammad Omar.
The Afghan officials are saying that Pak could play a key role in the reconciliation process and ending the violence in Afghanistan, insisting that the leadership councils of both the Taliban and the notorious Haqqani terrorist network are based inside the Pak soil where they have freedom of action and safe havens.
|Fatwa against terrorism|
|[DAWN] WHEN violence is justified in the name of religion, it is best countered with the language of religion. Last Saturday, 31 prominent scholars from all schools of thought issued a unanimous fatwa condemning extremism and terrorism. Declaring the supporters of as traitors, the religious decree defined jihad as being the purview of the state and disallowed the use of force to compel obedience to Islamic laws. The fatwa came at the conclusion of a national seminar organised by the International Islamic University in Islamabad to discuss the reconstruction of Pak society in the light of the Madina Charter. This document, often described as the oldest written constitution in the world, places emphasis on -- aside from various other issues -- peaceful resolution of disputes between people of different faiths, and the right of non- s to autonomy and freedom of religion.|
Granted, the fatwa contains little that is original: the have issued decrees along similar lines several times. There has been, in particular, a general consensus among them against -- even if it has not always been unequivocal -- in which they have also been targeted. For instance, in 2009, Mufti Sarfaraz Ahmed Naeemi paid with his life for his robust condemnation of in precisely such an attack. More recently, the JUI-F’s Maulana Ghafoor Haideri was injured when a struck his convoy, killing 27 people. The stance pertaining to jihad in the recently issued fatwa, however, is comparatively unusual. It harks back to the founder of , Maulana Maudoodi, not to mention other religious scholars of yore, who held that only a state can declare jihad and no individual or group has the right to wage a private jihad of its own.
The eminently sensible, if obvious, assertions in the decree have been met with disapproval by Maulana , who heads his own faction of the JUI. Known as the ’father of the ’ because his madressah in Akora Khattak, KP, is the alma mater of several senior Afghan Taliban -- including their late leader -- the maulana has long been among the most strident supporters of militancy. Expressing concern over the fatwa, he contended that the rulers of the world were puppets of the West and could not therefore declare jihad against their masters. This is a perverse argument that has never lost currency among the ultra right and has been used to advocate armed struggle against the state. Certainly, resistance against the excesses of undemocratic or dictatorial regimes is morally justifiable, but its objective must be clear and violence should never be used to achieve it. Now, more than ever at this juncture, when various purveyors of violent extremism are creating mayhem in Pakistain and the region, it is important once again for religious leaders to reiterate the principles of peaceful coexistence.
|25 killed as Deputy Chairman Senate Haideri's convoy hit by explosion in Mastung|
|[DAWN] At least 25 people have been killed and over 40 others injured in an in 's Mastung district, which is around an hour's drive from the , Quetta.|
The bombing took place near a local seminary shortly after Friday prayers.
Deputy Chairman Senate 's convoy was hit in the attack. The occurred right as Haideri's convoy was exiting the seminary.
A Senate director staff, Iftikhar Mughal, was reportedly killed in the attack.
It is unclear whether the was the result of an improvised (IED) or a . Police say the attack is likely to have been a .
Haideri had been invited to the seminary for an investiture ceremony, DawnNews reported.
Sounds like an inside job.
An eyewitness present at the event said the guests were leaving for a luncheon when Haideri's convoy came under attack.
Walked right into the setup. Maybe he drove.
The eyewitness told DawnNews that there was an , followed by sustained firing. "After the air cleared, we saw bodies everywhere."
A police car was part of Haideri's security detail and police officials are among those injured in the blast, another eyewitness said.
Haideri belongs to -Fazl (JUI-F).
While speaking briefly to media, he said he had suffered minor injuries but was otherwise fine.
He has been shifted to Combined Military Hospital Quetta for treatment. His condition, according to Balochistan government Anwar ul Haq Kakar, is "safe and sound".
Nearby vehicles were damaged by the impact of the blast. -- DawnNews
|JI, JUI-F renege on resolution against Mardan lynching|
On Tuesday, the lower house had unanimously adopted a resolution condemning the brutal murder of Abdul Wali Khan University student Mashal Khan on fabricated charges of blasphemy.
On that day, JI’s Sher Akbar Khan and JUI-F’s Naeema Kishwer Khan had spoken in favour of the resolution, even though the latter had not signed it. But on Wednesday, JI parliamentary leader Sahibzada Tariqullah came out in opposition to the proposal, saying that his party would not support any changes to the blasphemy law.
"The law is the law; whosoever forms a lynch mob should be acted against. But the blasphemy law does not call on people to dispense mob justice, there is nothing wrong with it," he declared.
"The problems we are facing are due to the lack of proper enforcement of these laws," he insisted, adding that if people were punished under the blasphemy law, there would be no room for mob justice.
Ms Khan also seemed to have a change of heart, saying that there was nothing in the blasphemy law that made people take the law into their own hands and called for its proper implementation.
|The JUI-F’s dilemma|
|[DAWN] THE (JUI) is one of the oldest religio-political parties in the subcontinent. It has rendered a valuable contribution towards shaping the contemporary identity in India and Pakistain, besides influencing religious and political behaviour in other parts of the wider region.|
In Pakistain, the faction of the JUI that is led by
|Special tribunal orders arrest of 25 leaders of radical Islamist groups|
|[Dhaka Tribune] The court has issued arrest warrants against 25 people, including leaders of , in a case lodged against them four years ago for instigating an attack on Gonojagoron Moncho on February 22, 2013.|
Dhaka Metropolitan 1 Special Tribunal Judge Mohammad Kamrul Hossain Molla ordered the arrest warrants based on the Shahbagh ’s charge sheet which accuses 29 people for the bombing under the Explosives Act.
Chairman Abdul Latif Nizami and Secretary General Mufti Md Faizullah, Bangladesh Khilafat Majlish Ameer Mawlana Md Ishaq, Secretary General Ahmed Abdul Quader and chief Mawlana Abdur Rouf Yusufi, Executive President Mufti Md Wakkas, Bangladesh Khilafat Andolon Ameer Shah Ahmedullah Ashraf and Nizam-e-Islam Bangladesh President Abdur Rakib are among the 25 accused.
The court has also ordered the Shahbagh OC to submit a report on April 6 stating whether these accused have been
|Afghan envoy meets Sami|
|[DAWN] NOWSHERA: Afghan Ambassador Dr Omar Zakhilwal met Maulana , chief of his own faction the , on Wednesday and discussed with him the situation in Afghanistan and other important issues.|
The diplomat visited the residence of Maulana Sami, who also heads the Defence of Pakistain Council, in Akora Khattak.
During the two-hour meeting, Pak-Afghan relations, restoration of a durable peace to the region and other issues were discussed.
|Partying with jihadis|
|[DAWN] FOR many years now, the Pak military has been criticised for supporting violent jihadi groups. And liberals can be forgiven for having strong feelings on the subject. During the 1990s, when the insurgency was in full swing, the liberals repeatedly predicted a backlash. The number of people killed by jihadists since then -- including many in the army -- shows that the liberals’ warnings were well founded.|
But the military has not been alone in indulging the men of violence. Civilian leaders too have cut deals with jihadis who, if circumstances permitted, would like to see those politicians not only out of power but dead and buried too. And this is not a point that favours one party over the others: all the mainstream parties have made compromises with the s.
The most obvious recent example concerns the decision of the provincial administration to grant $3 million to ’s Haqqani madressah. Lest anyone be in any doubt about where Samiul Haq stands on matters of contemporary politics, his recently published book claims that the Afghan Taliban provided good government; that was an "ideal man" and that Al Qaeda was a figment of the Western imagination.
Perhaps more importantly, some of those who assassinated met in his madressah whilst planning the attack. And has form in this area. When, in 2013, he agreed to head up the Pakistain Taliban’s negotiating team he demonstrated not only that he thought peace could be achieved through dialogue but also that he was willing to represent and speak for the TTP.
But it is not fair to single out the PTI leader. After all, in 2010 the provincial administration gave $1m to institutions linked to . In the same year, files recovered from Osama bin Laden’s compound in reportedly revealed that as Punjab chief minister suggested the Pakistain government was ready to re-establish "normal relations" with the Pak Taliban as long as it did not conduct operations in Punjab. And there have been compromises within Punjab as well. In the run-up to the 2013 election there were widespread reports of a seat adjustment deal between the PML-N and ASWJ. Faced with criticism about these arrangements, some PML-N spokesmen did not issue a denial but argued instead that PPP exhibited a blatant double standard on the issue because it had done much the same thing in 2008.
Certainly, the PPP has on occasion helped hardliners. Given what happened in Islamabad in 2007, it is astonishing that, today, Abdul Aziz Ghazi is not only back in charge of the but also drawing a state salary. As a recent independent documentary, Among the Believers, has recorded, it is not as if Abdul Aziz Ghazi has changed his view on the need to overthrow the government and impose Sharia: "if you think you can change us, forget it," he said.
And yet while Asif Ali Zardari was president the authorities not only oversaw the rehabilitation of Abdul Aziz Ghazi but went as far as offering him land for a new madressah on the edge of Islamabad. The idea, it seems, was that Lal Masjid needed to be compensated for the destruction it had brought upon itself.
These examples of civilian willingness to do business with violent jihadis suggest that they should not be taken too seriously when they criticise the army for doing much the same thing. Yet there is an important difference between the two. Ever since 1947-48, when the state connived in allowing Pakhtun to go on jihad in , the military has perceived the jihadis as a strategic asset that can help achieve various policy objectives. And some objectives have been achieved. The successful Mujahideen campaign against the Soviets in Afghanistan demonstrated that the violent jihadis can serve a purpose.
The politicians have different motives. Some are simply trying to protect themselves. After all, anyone extending favours to the jihadi leadership must calculate that there will be an improved chance that they won’t be the victim of an attack. But it’s not just a case of avoiding physical harm. There is also the grubby business of political advantage. Politicians on all sides have calculated that if securing power depends on reaching a deal with the religious hardliners then it’s a price well worth paying.
For millions of Paks who are not at the top of the various power structures, it might seem obvious enough that people who use violence to secure their objectives should be opposed. But most of those who have held power in Pakistain seem to have seen it differently. And while the military is often criticised for sponsoring jihadis, it’s only fair to point out that the politicians have themselves repeatedly appeased them.
|Communists would have occupied Pakistan had the Afghans not stopped them: Samiul Haq|
|[Khaama (Afghanistan)] A prominent Pak politician and religious scholar Maulana has said the communists would have occupied Pakistain had the Afghans not stopped them.|
Samiul Haq who is considered as the father of the Taliban group made the remarks as the Pak authorities have stepped up crackdown on the Afghan refugees which he called a bad policy.
He was speaking at a meeting with elders of the Afghan refugees here, insisting that the act would render the sacrifices of Paks meaningless.
"The forced repatriation and the law-enforcement agencies personnel’s harsh treatment of Afghan refugees would spoil the sacrifices Paks rendered by hosting the Afghans during the last more than 30 years," he was quoted as saying in a report by The News Internaitonal.
Samiul Haq further added that the Afghans laid down their lives to stop the invading forces of the Soviet Union in Afghanistan from intruding into and occupying other Islamic countries of the region.He said the communists would have occupied Pakistain had the Afghans not stopped them in Afghanistan.
He also claimed that the anti- powers wanted to pitch the Afghans and Paks against each other.
Assuring the Afghan elders to taCommunists would have occupied Pakistain had the Afghans not stopped them: Samiul Haqke up the issue with the civil and military leadership in Pakistain, Samiul Haq asked the Ulema across the country to inform the people about the consequences of the policy of unfriendly attitude towards the Afghan refugees for peace in Pakistain and the region.
|Fazl rules out possibility of coup in country|
|[DAWN] PESHAWAR: -Fazl chief has ruled out possibility of military coup in the country.|
"I don’t see any possibility of military takeover in the country, no doubt Army Chief Gen is a popular commander," he said in reply to a question put to him during a here on Tuesday.
He lauded the Turkish people and President for foiling the coup in The JUI-F chief said that some elements tried to instigate the army for takeover by displaying portraits of Gen Raheel across the country. He said that those elements attempted to make Gen Raheel controversial.
"Those, who displayed portraits of Gen Raheel, should be tried under Article 6 of the Constitution," he demanded, adding that those elements had harmed the army chief through displaying his portraits.
There was need of strict action against those elements, who had invited the army chief to take over, he said.
Mr Fazl said that abortive military coup in Turkey was an international conspiracy.
|Taliban madrassah agreed to reforms in return for Rs300m: Imran Khan|
|[DAWN] Pakistain (PTI) chairman on Friday said agreed to implement reforms in return for (KP) government's budget allocation of Rs300 million for the religious seminary.|
The seminary is located in Nowshera district of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa and currently run by -Sami chief Maulana . It has faced several controversies in the past as its students Abdullah alias Saddam Nadir alias Qari Ismail, Rasheed alias Turabi and Faiz Muhammad have been accused of involvement in the murder of former prime minister . The seminary is also said to be the alma mater of many prominent Afghan Taliban leaders.
"Musharraf received billions from the west for madressah reform and even Maulana Samiul Haq was approached but he rejected the grant, now they are ready for reforms as they trust PTI's government," Imran Khan told journalists during a in Islamabad.
Imran added that progressive reforms are being implemented to better integrate seminary students in to the mainstream, and said those opposing such moves know "little of Pak society."
"Are millions of students studying in these seminaries terrorists?"
The PTI chief further added he has asked the KP government to conduct a to better explain the grant.
Related: Imran defends KP govt's Rs300m grant for Darul Uloom Haqqania
When asked if he will visit PM when he returns to Pakistain, as the PM visited him when he fell from the container, the PTI chief stated he has sent flowers to the PM and would have visited him "if he were treated in a Pak hospital."
|Funds for madressah|
|[DAWN] DOLING out public funds to forward political agendas is a well-established practice in Pakistain. Out of many such instances, one particular political donation has been in the news of late. According to reports, the PTI-led KP government has put aside Rs300m for , located in Akora Khattak, from the recently passed provincial budget. Party and government officials have defended the ’donation’ in the name of bringing the seminary -- overseen by Maulana , who runs his own faction of the -- into the mainstream. Apparently, the funds will be spent on construction and repairs at the seminary. this ’donation’ has raised hackles, as questions of propriety and conflict of interest arise.|
For one thing, the madressah is a private institution. Critics are right to ask why a private set-up is receiving a large amount of public funds. After all, the KP budget is financed by the taxpayer; it is not the funds of the PTI that are being provided to the Darul Uloom, but of the people of the province. Also, if the KP administration justifies providing government funds to a private madressah, what of the other private institutions in the province; will they also be entitled to financial support from the state? Even if the seminary did not have links to hard-line circles -- as it very much does -- it would be difficult to justify this transfer of funds. Moreover, the Darul Uloom is a highly political seminary, a veritable arm of the JUI-S. Samiul Haq is also a rival of the JUI faction led by Maulana Fazlur Rahman, who in turn has a toxic rivalry with the PTI. So the financial support can be seen as supporting the ’enemy’ of the KP government’s ’enemy’, while the madressah is located in district Nowshera, the home district of the KP chief minister, which raises issues of conflict of interest. The decision to grant the seminary state funds should be revisited as it sets a negative precedent and politicises public funds.