Article

2012-06-11 India-Pakistan

US withdraws negotiators from Pakistan, no supply deal

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by tipper 2012-06-11 11:46|| || Front Page|| [2 views ] Top

#1 Good. Cut off all aid $

Posted by Frank G 2012-06-11 12:34|| 2012-06-11 12:34|| Front Page Top

#2 And insert Stuxnet and Flame into all their computers

Posted by Steve White 2012-06-11 14:06|| 2012-06-11 14:06|| Front Page Top

#3 And insert Stuxnet and Flame into all their computers

They're not already there? Shame on us.

Posted by Glenmore 2012-06-11 14:38|| 2012-06-11 14:38|| Front Page Top

#4 At last check, the new transit deal wid the CAR States was for "non-lethal goods" only, which IIUC translates into a lot of heavy US-NATO firepower + related Milwares staying behind in Pakistan until further notice.

As for the former SDN ...

* TOPIX > US - PAKISTAN SUPPLY ROUTE NEGOTIATORS ARE TAKING A BREAK [tempor hiatus], BUT ARE NOT STALLED.

* DEFENCE.PK/FORUMS > [Pak COAS]KAYANI [bitch]SLAPS THE PENTAGON, REFUSES TO MEET [US Asst. SecDef] PETER LAVOY.

IIUC, Islamabad claim is that the Kayani-Lavoy meeting was no good for them because the Pak Army's Top Eggs, etc. are usually on formal leave-of-absence.

* DEFENCE FORUM INDIA > PAKISTAN "TRASHED" + INSULTED: KAYANI WON'T MEET WID SENIOR US OFFICIAL [Peter Lavoy].

versus

* DEFENCE.PK/FORUMS > US SECDEF PANETTA THREATENS [strongly infers]GROUND INVASION INTO PAKISTAN, as based on his coment the US will "do whatever it takes" to protect its MilFors in Afghanistan, pre- + post-2014, from violent attacks originating from various Pak-based Militant-Terrorist "safe havens", e.g. Haqqani Network, which Islamabad doesn't appear to want do anything about???

HHHMMMM, HHMMMM, well, Syria or Pakistan, the US = US-Allies amy come head-to-head wid Pak BFF IRAN, as well Pak's other BFF CHINA???

WILL SAY IT AGAIN - A US-IRAN GROUND WAR NEED NOT NECESSARILY START IN IRAN PROPER???

* SAME > [TheNews.PK = Claim] NATO SUPPLIES BREAKTHROUGH: US TO FORMALLY APOLOGIZE FOR SALALA [ + pay US$2000.0 tariff/transit fee per Container], PAKISTAN TO REOPEN SUPPLY ROUTES.

ARTIC = US, Pakistan to launch "hot talks" on Supply Routes controversy + ultimately issue a "Joint Statement"???

* SAME > NEED TO PREVENT THE RETURN OF THE TALIBAN [to Power = Prominence] POST-2014: INDIA.

Posted by JosephMendiola 2012-06-11 23:16|| 2012-06-11 23:16|| Front Page Top

23:37 AlmostAnonymous5839
23:16 JosephMendiola
23:15 Anguper Hupomosing9418
21:29 trailing wife
20:13 Nimble Spemble
20:10 ansky26
20:10 Thing From Snowy Mountain
19:52 tu3031
19:48 Bright Pebbles
19:40 Barbara
19:25 tu3031
18:50 Frank G
18:31 Rambler in Virginia
18:22 Pappy
18:21 Pappy
18:17 CrazyFool
18:11 CrazyFool
18:00 Bright Pebbles
17:45 Chavins and Company8995
17:39 tu3031
17:37 Ho Chi B. Hayes7277
17:36 Ho Chi B. Hayes7277
17:34 Procopius2k
17:32 tu3031