Article

2014-08-29 -Signs, Portents, and the Weather-

Politico, WaPo, ABC: This "no strategy" comment will do serious damage

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by DarthVader 2014-08-29 12:32|| || Front Page|| [4 views ] Top

#1 It hurts because it is true.

Posted by DarthVader 2014-08-29 12:34|| 2014-08-29 12:34|| Front Page Top

#2 No clue.

Posted by Ebbang Uluque6305 2014-08-29 12:53|| 2014-08-29 12:53|| Front Page Top

#3 The faster the MSM and those who support the emperor recognize he has no clothes, the better off (safer) the country will be. I suspect the "No strategy" comment indicates that the various factions who advises him don't agree on policy. I can't believe the military hasn't "gamed" this six ways to Sunday in the last 2-3 years. Obama is torn between the hawk camp and the anti-war bunch in his base. He is like the jackass between two bales of hay that starved to death trying to decide which bale to go towards. He is trying to balance politics, votes, and ideology against taking on ISIS. He is not George W. Bush; he really can't make a decision.

Posted by JohnQC 2014-08-29 12:54|| 2014-08-29 12:54|| Front Page Top

#4 Some slack please. For once in his confused, dilatory life he wasn't bullshi*ing anyone.

Of course the counter-argument would be, "No stategy" is in fact a strategy.

Posted by Besoeker 2014-08-29 12:56|| 2014-08-29 12:56|| Front Page Top

#5 Ace wH spokesdude says the strategy is to "mitigate the ISIS threat". (Mitigating is like mulling to the "folks" supporting the Champ.)

Posted by Mugsy Glink 2014-08-29 13:12|| 2014-08-29 13:12|| Front Page Top

#6 The strategy is "Iran wins". How to implement it is the problem.

Posted by Grunter 2014-08-29 16:15|| 2014-08-29 16:15|| Front Page Top

#7 The strategy is detente and alliance with Iran.

Posted by Elmerert Hupens2660 2014-08-29 16:31|| 2014-08-29 16:31|| Front Page Top

#8 I suspect the "No strategy" comment indicates that the various factions who advises him don't agree on policy.

You've pretty much nailed it.

Posted by Pappy 2014-08-29 16:40|| 2014-08-29 16:40|| Front Page Top

#9 From a political angle, he could be putting the Hildebeast in a bad [WTF do I do or say now] position, and setting the ball up for Elizabeth Warren.

Posted by Besoeker 2014-08-29 16:47|| 2014-08-29 16:47|| Front Page Top

#10 There is no strategy because the request was "how do we defeat our enemies without fighting".

Posted by Airandee 2014-08-29 17:50|| 2014-08-29 17:50|| Front Page Top

#11 If Obama made a bad choice because he just triple chunked out of a sand trap, wouldn't the world be improving?

Posted by swksvolFF 2014-08-29 18:00|| 2014-08-29 18:00|| Front Page Top

23:30 USN, Ret.
23:26 Zhang Fei
22:54 JosephMendiola
22:50 JosephMendiola
22:30 JosephMendiola
22:02 swksvolFF
21:56 JohnQC
21:53 JohnQC
21:01 Zhang Fei
20:52 OldSpook
20:51 OldSpook
20:43 OldSpook
20:34 OldSpook
20:08 Zhang Fei
19:26 OldSpook
18:52 Airandee
18:23 JohnQC
18:04 Dale
18:02 Zhang Fei
18:01 swksvolFF
18:00 swksvolFF
17:50 Airandee
17:49 swksvolFF
17:39 swksvolFF