Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 09/03/2014 View Tue 09/02/2014 View Mon 09/01/2014 View Sun 08/31/2014 View Sat 08/30/2014 View Fri 08/29/2014 View Thu 08/28/2014
1
2014-09-03 Britain
Seizing militant passports problem for UK: Deputy PM
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Fred 2014-09-03 00:00|| || Front Page|| [1 views ]  Top

#1 He said it was not obvious how Britannia could withdraw passports from suspected turbans and remain inside the international law.

Sure it is - you could say 'fuck that noise' and do what's best for Britain, but that would be simplisme cowboy posturing, amirite?
Posted by Raj 2014-09-03 00:13||   2014-09-03 00:13|| Front Page Top

#2 Duel cits and multi-passport holders....wat about them? The problem isn't the passport, it's the fok'n person.

Alright, alright, it's a start.
Posted by Besoeker 2014-09-03 04:25||   2014-09-03 04:25|| Front Page Top

#3 Outlaw status.

Fighting for ISIS means citizen of "ISIS califéte" means ended citizenship of UK.

Simples.

Real reason. LibDumbs don't want to start removing citizenship from traitors because they'd be losing passports.
Posted by Bright Pebbles 2014-09-03 06:20||   2014-09-03 06:20|| Front Page Top

#4 Then just shoot them on sight. Lots of countries take that approach, and "international law" never seems to apply to them.
Posted by Rob Crawford 2014-09-03 07:01||   2014-09-03 07:01|| Front Page Top

#5 Go back to the old Medieval status of 'outlaw' which means they lose the protection of the crown and the king's law. They live amongst the population at their own risk.
Posted by Procopius2k 2014-09-03 08:42||   2014-09-03 08:42|| Front Page Top

#6 Nick Clegg has acknowledged that seizing the passports of suspected ISIL turbans returning from Iraq and Syria could be in violation of international law.

Declare them enemy combatants who want to invade UK. Or label them spies.
Posted by JohnQC 2014-09-03 09:21||   2014-09-03 09:21|| Front Page Top

#7 I don't understand the problem here if we are sincerely putting on our pointy noses.

ISJV is not a recognized international government. Fighting with or assisting ISJV is conducting violence against uniformed soldiers and civilians, therefore murder or accessory to murder, genocide.

Doesn't matter if the jihadi all stars cut them from the team, these people had the will to travel halfway across the world to die. They will then decide to do so wherever they come back to, if they are not already purposeful agents on missions.

Could just load them up on passenger jets and RC fly them back to ISJV. Fly them low and slow, paint them something offensive, like the battle standard of Don Juan or Jean Parisot de Valette.
Posted by swksvolFF 2014-09-03 09:33||   2014-09-03 09:33|| Front Page Top

#8 Henry VIII wouldn't have a problem. Good Queen Bess wouldn't even notice a "problem."
Posted by Fred 2014-09-03 10:54||   2014-09-03 10:54|| Front Page Top

#9 I'd get the UN to issue a stern condemnation. That should fix the problem!
Posted by SteveS 2014-09-03 14:02||   2014-09-03 14:02|| Front Page Top

#10 How stupid is this? It's as idiotic as if the US left its borders unguarded. Wait, what?
Posted by regular joe 2014-09-03 15:54||   2014-09-03 15:54|| Front Page Top

22:50 swksvolFF
22:42 CrazyFool
22:42 JosephMendiola
22:42 CrazyFool
22:37 JosephMendiola
22:24 Shipman
22:22 CrazyFool
22:21 CrazyFool
22:15 rammer
22:08 CrazyFool
22:08 Frank G
22:07 rammer
21:51 SteveS
21:49 rammer
21:45 Procopius2k
21:39 Procopius2k
21:24 rammer
20:53 Frank G
20:37 SteveS
20:03 JosephMendiola
20:01 JosephMendiola
19:59 Frank G
19:54 JosephMendiola
19:46 Frank G









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com