Article

2008-09-19 Home Front Economy

Talk of $1 Trillion Bailout Stuns Congresspersons

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Anguper Hupomosing9418 2008-09-19 14:33|| || Front Page|| [1 views ] Top

#1 Since the people are providing the money for these bailed out failed organizations, it seems like we are the owners to a large extent. Do we get any benefits for our money?

When are we going to get term limits for our Congress critters so they aren't in Washington long enough to become corrupt and steal anything?

Posted by JohnQC 2008-09-19 15:19|| 2008-09-19 15:19|| Front Page Top

#2 Americans aren't nearly outraged enough over this . These guys have made hundreds of billions of dollars in the biggest swindle of all times and now they are going to go running off to the Cayman Islands to retire while we pump a Trillion dollars of tax money into the industry to make it barely solvent. We've been sold out boys. Who is going to hold these persons responsible? Nobody. What will prevent them from doing it again? Nothing.

Posted by bigjim-ky 2008-09-19 15:20|| 2008-09-19 15:20|| Front Page Top

#3 $1,000,000,000,000! Our total Gross Domestic Product is $16,830,100, 000,000. This bailout is a little over 6% of our GDP. That is astounding. Washington vote buying schemes, give away programs, and social engineering programs are going to break this country!

Posted by JohnQC 2008-09-19 15:38|| 2008-09-19 15:38|| Front Page Top

#4 The bailout may be as much as $1 trillion if all the worst case scenarios come true. But --

1) it won't be paid out all at once.
2) some of it comes back if the Fed liquidates assets, even if they do so at ten cents on the dollar.
3) stabilizing the markets saves us from a bigger disaster.

When the government bailed out Chrysler, it made a profit. When the government bailed out the S & L's (remember that mess?), the losses weren't nearly as great as predicted.

I don't like bailouts, but I like economic meltdowns a lot less. The right thing to do is get in front and lead, and that's what the Fed and the Treasury Dept are doing.

Posted by Steve White 2008-09-19 15:51|| 2008-09-19 15:51|| Front Page Top

#5 Your right Steve. Bailout is preferable to failure. I wonder if we are only seeing the tip of the iceberg or are we beginning to head out of this thing. There is a lot of credit card debt out there also.

Posted by JohnQC 2008-09-19 16:28|| 2008-09-19 16:28|| Front Page Top

#6 Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae sold mortgages to third parties such as pension plans, corporations such as Merrill Lynch, etc. and insurance companies such as AIG. Many of these mortgages were subprime, i.e. to say risky.

Posted by JohnQC 2008-09-19 16:32|| 2008-09-19 16:32|| Front Page Top

#7 I'd like to point out that there are still good odds that the $1T will not be enough. And if it isn't, then there is still a grand potential for an international credit collapse.

Otherwise, let me note that already there is a "slow bank run" in progress around the US. People are quietly withdrawing cash from bank accounts, solely to have cash on hand.

It would not be a bad idea to have a few thousand in cash at home or in a safe place outside of a financial institution. Just for six months. If things have improved by then, you will just be out a literally couple dollars in interest.

Posted by Anonymoose 2008-09-19 16:46|| 2008-09-19 16:46|| Front Page Top

#8 My feeling is $2T or more.

Posted by Zhang Fei 2008-09-19 16:46|| http://timurileng.blogspot.com]">[http://timurileng.blogspot.com] 2008-09-19 16:46|| Front Page Top

#9 WTF, who is going to pay for all of this?

Posted by General_Comment 2008-09-19 17:29|| 2008-09-19 17:29|| Front Page Top

#10 Ya got a mirror?

Posted by tu3031 2008-09-19 17:30|| 2008-09-19 17:30|| Front Page Top

#11 It was a rhetorical question . . .

Posted by General_Comment 2008-09-19 17:32|| 2008-09-19 17:32|| Front Page Top

#12 Heh, state socialism through government buyout of the major corps. [Looking Backward (1888)]

Posted by Procopius2k 2008-09-19 17:34|| 2008-09-19 17:34|| Front Page Top

#13 So whose going to jail over this?

{Crickets}

Thought so.

Posted by DMFD 2008-09-19 17:51|| 2008-09-19 17:51|| Front Page Top

#14 I see General Nuisance is here again.

*Yawn.*

Hard getting good help, eh, Pootie?

Posted by Barbara Skolaut">Barbara Skolaut 2008-09-19 17:51|| http://ariellestjohndesigns.com/]">[http://ariellestjohndesigns.com/] 2008-09-19 17:51|| Front Page Top

#15

Redacted by moderator. Comments may be redacted for trolling, violation of standards of good manners, or plain stupidity. Please correct the condition that applies and try again. Contents may be viewed in the sinktrap. Further violations may result in banning.

Posted by General_Comment 2008-09-19 17:59|| 2008-09-19 17:59|| Front Page Top

#16 General_Comment has much improved I think, Barbara. I was a bit obnoxious about his Ovaltine comment yesterday, and he remained calm and reasonable. Some of our best posters charged in roaringly obnoxious, and stayed to learn and teach.

Posted by trailing wife ">trailing wife 2008-09-19 18:08|| 2008-09-19 18:08|| Front Page Top

#17 "Some of our best posters charged in roaringly obnoxious, and stayed to learn and teach."

Judging by his pathetic "me man, you slave" response, tw, I suspect he can't do either.

Posted by Barbara Skolaut">Barbara Skolaut 2008-09-19 18:15|| http://ariellestjohndesigns.com/]">[http://ariellestjohndesigns.com/] 2008-09-19 18:15|| Front Page Top

#18 It time to decide if we are a capitalist or a socialist economy.

This middle step of paying for the losses while the earnings slip away is destroying the middle class.

Letting the S* hit the fan would be bad, but if they would just leave it alone the problem will correct itself in 18 months.

Posted by flash91 2008-09-19 18:18|| 2008-09-19 18:18|| Front Page Top

#19 Barb, you are not a slave - merely an angry woman.

Posted by General_Comment 2008-09-19 18:19|| 2008-09-19 18:19|| Front Page Top

#20 Honey, how can I be angry when I'm laughing at you?

Can you say "projection"?

Posted by Barbara Skolaut">Barbara Skolaut 2008-09-19 18:25|| http://ariellestjohndesigns.com/]">[http://ariellestjohndesigns.com/] 2008-09-19 18:25|| Front Page Top

#21 Please prove me right, General_Comment. Besides, if Barbara is doing domestic chores, she won't have time to arrange for a third popcorn machine and supplies, which are really needed as the U.S. and Canadian elections approach.

Posted by trailing wife ">trailing wife 2008-09-19 18:30|| 2008-09-19 18:30|| Front Page Top

#22 a) Laughter can be an angry laughter.
b) No, I cannot say "projection" - English is my second language.

Posted by General_Comment 2008-09-19 18:30|| 2008-09-19 18:30|| Front Page Top

#23 Hate to be the one to break it to you, "General," but I'm not angry at you (or anyone else, for that matter).

You're not worth the energy anger would take - even if I could come up with a reason to be bothered.

The word you're searching for is indifferent.

Perhaps you don't know my motto: Any day you wake up is a good day. :-D

Posted by Barbara Skolaut">Barbara Skolaut 2008-09-19 18:38|| http://ariellestjohndesigns.com/]">[http://ariellestjohndesigns.com/] 2008-09-19 18:38|| Front Page Top

#24 If you were "indifferent" Barb, then why bother posting?

At the very least you do not seem to be indifferent to Mr. Putin, as I gather from your posting . . . .

Posted by General_Comment 2008-09-19 18:43|| 2008-09-19 18:43|| Front Page Top

#25 Posting is for the snark value, Gen.

But I'll stop - it's obvious you don't get it, and that makes it a waste of my time.

As for Pootie - he's your problem. Good luck with that....

Posted by Barbara Skolaut">Barbara Skolaut 2008-09-19 18:53|| http://ariellestjohndesigns.com/]">[http://ariellestjohndesigns.com/] 2008-09-19 18:53|| Front Page Top

#26 But I'll stop

A: Thank you.

Posted by General_Comment 2008-09-19 19:01|| 2008-09-19 19:01|| Front Page Top

#27 You're velcome.

Posted by Barbara Skolaut">Barbara Skolaut 2008-09-19 19:45|| http://ariellestjohndesigns.com/]">[http://ariellestjohndesigns.com/] 2008-09-19 19:45|| Front Page Top

#28 See CHINESE MIL FORUM > WHAT IF MARX AND MAO WERE RIGHT AFTER ALL!?

* SAME > POSTER OPINIONS - THE USA SHOULD CHANGE ITS NAME TO USSA[ Proposed Dubya Bailout + New Govt.Powers], versus "CRUS" [CRIMES-R-US = CRIMINAL REPUBS OF AMERIKA" due to seemingly pervasive CRIMINAL-NEPOTIST CULTURE in US GOVT-SOCIETY. ONe Poster argues that genuine/true CHRISTIANITY has been dying for 100 years, and has been replaced by CRIMINAL FAITH/CRIMINALISM???

Posted by JosephMendiola 2008-09-19 20:49|| 2008-09-19 20:49|| Front Page Top

#29 The beauty of this site is the presentation of plenty of mean data that can be useful. That and humor.
I liked that presentation, alot.

Posted by newc">newc 2008-09-19 20:49|| 2008-09-19 20:49|| Front Page Top

#30 Yaaaawnnnn.... trillions shmillions.

Think about this, the velocity of money in the U.S. is about 6. That means the guvmint spends the money once, maybe it helps boodt the economy, maybe it doesn't, but the general public will spend it 5 more times that year. And that's the good news.

Now, we just need to borrow that trillion, and we're in good shape.

That, by the way, is why government deficits aren't the bad thing we think they are. Nations aren't smal businesses or household budgets.

Posted by Mike N. 2008-09-19 23:04|| 2008-09-19 23:04|| Front Page Top