Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 12/08/2004 View Tue 12/07/2004 View Mon 12/06/2004 View Sun 12/05/2004 View Sat 12/04/2004 View Fri 12/03/2004 View Thu 12/02/2004
1
2004-12-08 Britain
Blair challenged to tally Iraq war dead
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by God Save The World 2004-12-08 10:19:34 PM|| || Front Page|| [2 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Bianca Jagger - The Sandinesta? Really?
Posted by 3dc 2004-12-08 12:49:03 AM||   2004-12-08 12:49:03 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 Tony should come down hard on these clowns. He won't however. The left love to eat their own.
Posted by Sock Puppet of Doom 2004-12-08 1:01:50 AM|| [http://www.slhess.com]  2004-12-08 1:01:50 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 It would also be interesting to keep a tally of how many Iraqi civilians have been killed at the hands of insurgents and how many bodies are plucked from mass graves.
Posted by Howard UK 2004-12-08 4:06:52 AM||   2004-12-08 4:06:52 AM|| Front Page Top

#4 What a motley crew. They have too much time on their hands. I'm not sure why it's up to Blair to try to count Iraqi dead. Since when is it the job of one side to count the dead of their enemy? Surely the will and the means to get an accurate tally of Iraqi dead should come from the Iraqis themselves? Or am I missing something here?
Posted by Bryan 2004-12-08 4:08:50 AM||   2004-12-08 4:08:50 AM|| Front Page Top

#5 It's not about dead Iraqis. Otherwise they would want an accounting of the 1 million missing during Saddam's rule. Well not entirely missing. More than 300,000 have been found so far and new mass graves are being discovered. Why didn't Sir Stephen Egerton and the others speak up when they were in positions to do something about it?
Posted by ed 2004-12-08 4:26:36 AM||   2004-12-08 4:26:36 AM|| Front Page Top

#6 See this is the story, any Iraqi killed is the fault of Tony and George no matter who did it or why. That is all these people are any good at tearing stuff down. They haven't built up one thing good in their whole useless LLL life.
Posted by Sock Puppet of Doom 2004-12-08 5:07:17 AM|| [http://www.slhess.com]  2004-12-08 5:07:17 AM|| Front Page Top

#7 SpoD, Hear!, Hear!
Posted by phil_b 2004-12-08 6:23:58 AM||   2004-12-08 6:23:58 AM|| Front Page Top

#8 It's easy.
3654821067
Posted by gromgorru  2004-12-08 7:03:16 AM||   2004-12-08 7:03:16 AM|| Front Page Top

#9 ed and SPOD...right you are.
Posted by 2b 2004-12-08 7:25:33 AM||   2004-12-08 7:25:33 AM|| Front Page Top

#10 More fetishization of Vietnam.

Odd that they never demanded a body count from Pol Pot, or Hugo Chavez, or Castro, or the Sandinistas.
Posted by Robert Crawford  2004-12-08 8:07:28 AM|| [http://www.kloognome.com/]  2004-12-08 8:07:28 AM|| Front Page Top

#11 Got this from here:

Since retiring from the RAF, he has been closely involved in developing foreign and security policy for the Liberal Democrats. He is now a member of both the Federal Executive and the Federal Policy Committee. He is deputy Chairman of the National Liberal Club. He became a Life Peer in June 2004. His wife, Sue, is the Lib Dem prospective parliamentary candidate for Finchley & Golders Green, and they live in Hampstead.

I see the missus is up for something in the Liberal Democratic Party. Could that explain why Sir Timothy Garden is making such a fuss?

Goddam those facts! They get in the way of a perfectly decent agenda-pushing 'news' item. I guess what were once considered press releases are now 'stories.'
Posted by badanov  2004-12-08 8:19:01 AM|| [http://www.rkka.org/title-boris.gif]  2004-12-08 8:19:01 AM|| Front Page Top

#12 Bleeding hearts always want to count caskets instead of honor the fallen for the cause in which they died to advance. Disgusting.
Posted by Capt America  2004-12-08 6:27:36 PM||   2004-12-08 6:27:36 PM|| Front Page Top

#13 Come on, people. Since when is counting civilian deaths in this "war" a bad idea? Don't get distracted by the secondary issues. This is a war against no clearly determined enemy and innocent people are dying. We should know about it. The fact that Blair said no is clear indication he is hiding something and afraid of the truth. Sure we should have counted Saddam's atrocities and everyone else's for that matter, but just because we didn't, does this mean we shouldn't now?
Posted by reesh  2004-12-21 6:02:27 AM||   2004-12-21 6:02:27 AM|| Front Page Top

06:02 reesh
23:52 Carl in N.H.
23:33 Bomb-a-rama
23:30 anonymous2U
23:21 Uleque Glavise4887
23:12 Alaska Paul
23:11 Bomb-a-rama
23:10 2b
23:06 Alaska Paul
23:06 Uleque Glavise4887
23:02 2b
23:00 True German Ally
22:57 gromky
22:54 Uleque Glavise4887
22:47 Uleque Glavise4887
22:46 Alaska Paul
22:36 Laurence of the Rats
22:23 gromky
22:13 Alaska Paul
22:09 Asedwich
22:07 smn
22:04 Frank G
21:43 Uleque Hupavise4887
21:42 Anonymoose









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com