Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 03/08/2006 View Tue 03/07/2006 View Mon 03/06/2006 View Sun 03/05/2006 View Sat 03/04/2006 View Fri 03/03/2006 View Thu 03/02/2006
1
2006-03-08 Iraq
U.S. transfers control of much of Baghdad
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Anonymoose 2006-03-08 09:27|| E-Mail|| Front Page|| [357 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 no, it's a quagmire. sectarian violennce has overrun the city. civil war has broken out. the military is no more competent to fight than girl scout troop.

see. I read the NYT!
Posted by anymouse">anymouse  2006-03-08 10:02||   2006-03-08 10:02|| Front Page Top

#2 seems to me in recent weeks Anbar has continued to get quieter, but Baghdad, which had been becoming quieter in the fall and early winter, has become worse. Good to see the transfer moving ahead on schedule, despite the murder of the Iraqi commander in Baghdad. But it would be a mistake to ignore what a difficult task these Iraqi army units have on their platter. It will be interesting to see how well they do.
Posted by liberalhawk 2006-03-08 10:29||   2006-03-08 10:29|| Front Page Top

#3 Its a shame the 6th div's general wont be thier from what I have read he was definatley one of the good guys.

I hope we are drawing up contingency plans to take out Sadr when Iran tells him to jump agian.
Posted by C-Low 2006-03-08 10:48||   2006-03-08 10:48|| Front Page Top

#4 With today's kidnapping, they've got their work cut out for them.
Posted by Whineger Phaviting8058 2006-03-08 11:16||   2006-03-08 11:16|| Front Page Top

#5 So this would be a example of the "good news" coming out of Iraq, that so many Bush supporters
in the GWOT, claim that the so called MSM DOESNT
report or ignores.

The question then arises, that if more "good news" of progress was being reported by the
MSM in balance with the "bad news" of daily violence, casualties and deaths of U.S. military/coalition forces and Iraqi civilians, by a stubborn growing insurgency and potential civil war, would U.S. public support for the Iraq War and President Bush stop its negative nosedive in the polls and return to former positive majority status?
Posted by Just Curious 2006-03-08 11:17||   2006-03-08 11:17|| Front Page Top

#6 JC, given the continued US casualties, and continued obstacle to progress, support for the war would probably have declined under any circumstances. However it might have declined more slowly. Given the importance of timing - the fact that what Iraq needs most is time for the train and equip process, especially - this might well be significant to the ultimate outcome.
Posted by liberalhawk 2006-03-08 11:57||   2006-03-08 11:57|| Front Page Top

#7 Don't know JC. Let's have three years of good news from the press and find out.
Posted by plainslow 2006-03-08 15:41||   2006-03-08 15:41|| Front Page Top

#8 The problem with the press is

Good news= No news= No job
Posted by SwissTex 2006-03-08 16:08||   2006-03-08 16:08|| Front Page Top

#9 I have seen much good news reported from Iraq. I dont understand why it's said its not reported
by Bush supporters. I have also seen the bad news coming out of Iraq. I think the american public is intelligent enough to come to their own conclusions as to support the war or not.
Posted by Just Curious 2006-03-08 16:16||   2006-03-08 16:16|| Front Page Top

#10 A shrine blows up, and it's Civil War. After a few hours of battle, it's a quagmire (both in Afghanstan and Iraq). All I want the press to do is, say the Shrine blew up. And the particulars on the explosion. Or that the troops have halted. Not thier opinion of it's future ramifications. That's not thier job. If they do, than that's opinion, not news. It's not so much the news, just the obvious direction they are atempting to lead us in. It's also why they are having a hard time money wise.
Posted by plainslow 2006-03-08 16:46||   2006-03-08 16:46|| Front Page Top

#11 #9 Yes, JC, I have drawn my own conclusions. Your son in the war, JC? Ready to go again, is he? Delighted to have been there helping with last January's elections? Happy to have made a "difference", JC?

I am delighted to have furthered my sense of 'spin' at Rantburg, and even - from time to time - have pointed out spin. Somebody (.com?) once said, "Good catch, Bobby".

Meant a lot to me, JC, but I've been coming here for 18 months. Mebbe you'll still be here a year from now? With the same name?
Posted by Bobby 2006-03-08 21:54||   2006-03-08 21:54|| Front Page Top

#12 And some of us have thanked you, Bobby, for fathering such a son, and for sharing him with us all. And we're awfully glad you know where to get real news, so you know when you don't have to worry about him as much.
Posted by trailing wife 2006-03-08 23:26||   2006-03-08 23:26|| Front Page Top

06:33 Listen To Dogs
03:48 Listen To Dogs
23:49 DanNY
23:42 Flomoting Ebbeanter8112
23:38 Flomoting Ebbeanter8112
23:37 Flomoting Ebbeanter8112
23:36 Old Patriot
23:32 Flomoting Ebbeanter8112
23:31 JosephMendiola
23:30 Old Patriot
23:29 2b
23:26 trailing wife
23:25 Flomoting Ebbeanter8112
23:23 Flomoting Ebbeanter8112
23:20 2b
23:20 Ulaigum Ebbereck6419
23:18 Old Patriot
23:18 JosephMendiola
23:12 Barbara Skolaut
23:09 Barbara Skolaut
23:08 JosephMendiola
23:05 Flomoting Ebbeanter8112
23:04 Old Patriot
23:02 Old Patriot

Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
3.92.92.168

Merry-Go-Blog










Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com